You can't dismiss brain imaging as just an academic gimmick

March 26, 2014 by Matt Wall, The Conversation
Not just a scholarly toy. pennstatelive, CC BY-NC-ND

Given the media coverage brain imaging studies get, you might think that they are constantly revealing important secrets about this mysterious organ.

Catherine Loveday thinks otherwise. She makes the point that using -scanning technology to understand what a diseased brain is doing is only of academic interest. It is the study of the mind through behaviour and other cognitive functions, she argues, that leads to useful insights about disorders and treatments.

There is some truth here, but as a scientist who uses brain scans every day, I would argue that they contribute a lot more than Loveday gives them credit for.

The main problem is that, when it comes to the brain, all analogies are hopelessly crude. The distinction between hardware and software – or the brain and the mind – only has limited practical usefulness. Since all mental processes arise as a result of brain processes, it follows that all mental problems are also a result of dysfunctions in the physical brain.

This will be seen by many as an extreme and reductionist position, but a specific example should help to show that it has some value.

Parkinson's disease is a degenerative disorder that causes a variety of symptoms including motor problems, sleep disturbance, various cognitive issues, and often depression. This variety of symptoms might suggest that the underlying problem in Parkinson's is quite broad and complex, affecting several brain systems. However, it turns out the cause of all these symptoms is quite specific: a loss of neurons in a region of the brain called the substantia nigra.

The wide variety of symptoms in Parkinson's is produced by projections from this region that influence other brain areas. Parkinson's then, is a clear hardware problem, and is in fact amenable to hardware-based treatments. Many patients have now been implanted with deep-brain stimulation devices which electrically stimulate neurons in the problem area to increase their activity. Such devices can be remarkably effective in controlling the symptoms of Parkinson's.

Our current understanding of Parkinson's disease owes a large debt to brain scanning research. The TransEuro project is a current research program involving 15 institutions across Europe to investigate the use of stem-cell treatments in Parkinson's. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) form a cornerstone of the research in this project, as well as in many others. Brain scans are also often used clinically to rule out alternative diagnoses in cases of suspected Parkinson's.

Credit: Matt Wall

Another startling example comes from the work of Adrian Owen, of the University of Waterloo, on patients in a persistent vegetative state. These are people who have suffered serious injuries or diseases leading to being unresponsive to any external stimuli. They can't move, talk, or respond in any way.

Until recently, it was unknown whether these patients were truly unconscious, or whether they had some awareness of their surroundings and just could not respond. Starting in 2006, Owen and his colleagues have shown that some of these patients are able to respond meaningfully, proving that they are indeed aware of their environment. They achieved this by using functional to measure in patients as questions were asked. One patient has even learned to change his brain activity in such a way that he is able to answer "yes" or "no" to questions.

In these cases there is no way to access the patients' mind through studying their behaviour or asking them questions. Accessing their brain activity through functional scans is the only communication option left. The demonstration that some of these patients are in fact conscious has important implications for patient care, medical ethics, and clinical decision-making.

Most other mental problems are unfortunately not nearly so clear-cut as Parkinson's, or (fortunately) so extreme as a . Describing the underlying brain problem in, say, autism, depression, or schizophrenia is more difficult, and our understanding of these disorders is therefore less advanced. It seems likely that these issues are probably associated with more subtle problems, across several brain regions. Some may even be undetectable with current technology, however that is a practical issue and will hopefully be resolved as the technology improves. Just because we can't currently visualise all the brain effects associated with these disorders doesn't mean they don't exist.

The most fruitful approach when trying to gain understanding about something as complex as mental disorders is to use all the sources of evidence available. That means integrating results from brain imaging, animal models, genetics, and studies of behaviour and cognition too.

No matter how impressive brain-scanning technology becomes, there will always be a need for people who understand cognition and behaviour to design the right experiments that will produce the most valuable and useful results from the technology. Using the two approaches together creates a powerful set of tools that can potentially produce practical, clinically helpful information, as well as amazing scientific results.

Explore further: Scientists redefine how the brain plans movement

Related Stories

Scientists redefine how the brain plans movement

February 3, 2014

(Medical Xpress)—University of Queensland researchers have made a surprise discovery about how the brain plans movement that may lead to more targeted treatments for patients with Parkinson's disease.

Can a virtual brain replace lab rats?

February 14, 2014

Testing the effects of drugs on a simulated brain could lead to breakthrough treatments for neurological disorders such as Parkinson's, Huntington's and Alzheimer's disease.

Recommended for you

New insights on how cocaine changes the brain

November 25, 2015

The burst of energy and hyperactivity that comes with a cocaine high is a rather accurate reflection of what's going on in the brain of its users, finds a study published November 25 in Cell Reports. Through experiments conducted ...

Can physical exercise enhance long-term memory?

November 25, 2015

Exercise can enhance the development of new brain cells in the adult brain, a process called adult neurogenesis. These newborn brain cells play an important role in learning and memory. A new study has determined that mice ...

Umbilical cells help eye's neurons connect

November 24, 2015

Cells isolated from human umbilical cord tissue have been shown to produce molecules that help retinal neurons from the eyes of rats grow, connect and survive, according to Duke University researchers working with Janssen ...

Brain connections predict how well you can pay attention

November 24, 2015

During a 1959 television appearance, Jack Kerouac was asked how long it took him to write his novel On The Road. His response – three weeks – amazed the interviewer and ignited an enduring myth that the book was composed ...

No cable spaghetti in the brain

November 24, 2015

Our brain is a mysterious machine. Billions of nerve cells are connected such that they store information as efficiently as books are stored in a well-organized library. To this date, many details remain unclear, for instance ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Mar 26, 2014
The main problem is that, when it comes to the brain, all analogies are hopelessly crude. The distinction between hardware and software – or the brain and the mind – only has limited practical usefulness. Since all mental processes arise as a result of brain processes, it follows that all mental problems are also a result of dysfunctions in the physical brain.

You have dismissed ongoing large scale clinical trails and successful therapy.

You are asked to reconsider your logic. The logic can not be successfully upheld.
'Get with the program' goes the saying.
The 'program' here is literally software.

not rated yet Mar 26, 2014
not rated yet Mar 26, 2014
Typographical corrections to entries above so far.
not rated yet Mar 26, 2014
Parkinson's disease is identified by behaviour, not brain pathology. If it was brain based only, then every individual would need to be scanned in order to find those suffering the disease.

Scientist should stop trying to fight off every other discipline in the hope of gaining intellectual territory for their discipline. This is 19th century territorial warfare...time for a science version of the UN in order to get some peace?
not rated yet Mar 27, 2014
Oh for goodness sake. Quibbling over diagnostic (tools)? The sources of reliable diagnostics is secondary to the primary purpose of diagnostics - identification.

You are asking and telling readers when you switch on your pc
to check the plug and wall socket instead of looking for removed hard drive

Pointless drivel.

Then more pointless thrown together drivel fantasizing about a concocted potpourri of war, peace, property, and intellect.



Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.