The unconscious mind can detect a liar—even when the conscious mind fails

March 24, 2014
The unconscious mind can detect a liar -- even when the conscious mind fails

When it comes to detecting deceit, your automatic associations may be more accurate than conscious thought in pegging truth-tellers and liars, according to research published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

The findings suggest that may hinder our ability to detect whether someone is lying, perhaps because we tend to seek out behaviors that are supposedly stereotypical of , like averted eyes or fidgeting. But those behaviors may not be all that indicative of an untrustworthy person.

"Our was prompted by the puzzling but consistent finding that humans are very poor , performing at only about 54% accuracy in traditional lie detection tasks," explains psychological scientist and study author Leanne ten Brinke, postdoctoral fellow at the University of California, Berkeley's Haas School of Business.

That's hardly better than chance, as if participants were simply guessing whether the person was lying. And it's a finding that seems at odds with the fact that humans are typically sensitive to how others are feeling, what they're thinking, and what their personalities are like.

Along with UC Berkeley colleague Dayna Stimson and Berkeley-Haas Asst. Prof. Dana Carney, ten Brinke hypothesized that these seemingly paradoxical findings may be accounted for by unconscious processes:

"We set out to test whether the unconscious mind could catch a liar – even when the conscious mind failed," she says.

The researchers first had 72 participants watch videos of "suspects" in a mock-crime interview. Some of the suspects in the videos had actually stolen a $100 bill from a bookshelf, whereas others had not. However, all of the suspects were instructed to tell the interviewer they had not stolen the money. In doing so, one group of suspects must have been lying, whereas the other group must have been telling the truth.

When the 72 participants were asked to say which suspects they thought were lying and which were telling the truth, they were pretty inaccurate: They were only able to detect liars 43% of the time, and truth-tellers only 48% of the time.

But the researchers also employed widely-used behavioral reaction time tests (one of which is called the Implicit Association Test or IAT) to probe participants' more automatic instincts towards the suspects.

Results showed that participants were more likely to unconsciously associate deception-related words (e.g. "untruthful," dishonest," and "deceitful") with the suspects who were actually lying. At the same time, participants were more likely to associate truthful words (e.g. "honest" or "valid") with the suspects who were actually telling the truth.

A second experiment confirmed these findings, providing evidence that people may have some intuitive sense, outside of conscious awareness, that detects when someone is lying.

"These results provide a new lens through which to examine social perception, and suggest that – at least in terms of detection of lies – unconscious measures may provide additional insight into interpersonal accuracy," says ten Brinke.

Explore further: Liars find it more rewarding to tell truth than fib when deceiving others

More information:

Related Stories

Psychologist discovers intricacies about lying

September 4, 2013

What happens when you tell a lie? Set aside your ethical concerns for a moment—after all, lying is a habit we practice with astonishing dexterity and frequency, whether we realize it or not. What goes on in your brain when ...

True story: Not everyone lies frequently

December 13, 2013

Does everybody lie? We are taught that this is common sense and that most people tell little white lies. But perhaps this isn't true. A recent paper published in Human Communication Research found that many people are honest ...

Recommended for you

Elderly may face increased dementia risk after a disaster

October 24, 2016

Elderly people who were uprooted from damaged or destroyed homes and who lost touch with their neighbors after the 2011 tsunami in Japan were more likely to experience increased symptoms of dementia than those who were able ...

Research examines role of early-life stress in adult illness

October 24, 2016

Scientists have long known that chronic exposure to psychosocial stress early in life can lead to an increased vulnerability later in life to diseases linked to immune dysfunction and chronic inflammation, including arthritis, ...

Plan ahead for successful aging, researcher says

October 20, 2016

For many people, the prospect of aging is scary and uncomfortable, but Florida State University Assistant Professor Dawn Carr says that research reveals a few tips that can improve our chances of a long, healthy life.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (2) Mar 24, 2014
There are no statistics to indicate how much better the unconsious was. Therefore, this article is not useful.
1 / 5 (1) Mar 24, 2014
This explains why most of us know that Obama is such a liar. Or maybe we know because whatever he says is later shown to be a blatant lie.
1 / 5 (1) Mar 24, 2014
agree with bobsage. bearly, lol wtf non-sequitor much? lol fool.
5 / 5 (1) Mar 24, 2014
Wish I was better at knowing. Seems like everything is a lie these days. Advertisements, the government, friends, the news.
not rated yet Mar 25, 2014
Re "intuitive sense": conscious or unconscious, the detection of lying was still based on something that was observed. It would be useful to figure out what.
not rated yet Mar 28, 2014
How do you picture a lie without words?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.