How the brain pays attention (w/ video)

by Anne Trafton
Screen shots from a video of overlapping images of faces and houses, shown to subjects who were asked to pay attention to one or the other.

Picking out a face in the crowd is a complicated task: Your brain has to retrieve the memory of the face you're seeking, then hold it in place while scanning the crowd, paying special attention to finding a match.

A new study by MIT neuroscientists reveals how the achieves this type of focused attention on faces or other objects: A part of the prefrontal cortex known as the inferior frontal junction (IFJ) controls visual processing areas that are tuned to recognize a specific category of objects, the researchers report in the April 10 online edition of Science.

Scientists know much less about this type of attention, known as object-based attention, than spatial attention, which involves focusing on what's happening in a particular location. However, the new findings suggest that these two types of attention have similar mechanisms involving related , says Robert Desimone, the Doris and Don Berkey Professor of Neuroscience, director of MIT's McGovern Institute for Brain Research, and senior author of the paper.

"The interactions are surprisingly similar to those seen in spatial attention," Desimone says. "It seems like it's a parallel process involving different areas."

In both cases, the prefrontal cortex—the control center for most cognitive functions—appears to take charge of the brain's attention and control relevant parts of the visual cortex, which receives sensory input. For spatial attention, that involves regions of the that map to a particular area within the visual field.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
A video of overlapping images of faces and houses was shown to subjects who were asked to pay attention to one or the other. Video: Daniel Baldauf

In the new study, the researchers found that IFJ coordinates with a brain region that processes faces, known as the fusiform face area (FFA), and a region that interprets information about places, known as the parahippocampal place area (PPA). The FFA and PPA were first identified in the human cortex by Nancy Kanwisher, the Walter A. Rosenblith Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience at MIT.

The IFJ has previously been implicated in a cognitive ability known as working memory, which is what allows us to gather and coordinate information while performing a task—such as remembering and dialing a phone number, or doing a math problem.

For this study, the researchers used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to scan human subjects as they viewed a series of overlapping images of faces and houses. Unlike functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which is commonly used to measure , MEG can reveal the precise timing of neural activity, down to the millisecond. The researchers presented the overlapping streams at two different rhythms—two images per second and 1.5 images per second—allowing them to identify brain regions responding to those stimuli.

"We wanted to frequency-tag each stimulus with different rhythms. When you look at all of the brain activity, you can tell apart signals that are engaged in processing each stimulus," says Daniel Baldauf, a postdoc at the McGovern Institute and the lead author of the paper.

Each subject was told to pay attention to either faces or houses; because the houses and faces were in the same spot, the brain could not use spatial information to distinguish them. When the subjects were told to look for faces, activity in the FFA and the IFJ became synchronized, suggesting that they were communicating with each other. When the subjects paid attention to houses, the IFJ synchronized instead with the PPA.

The researchers also found that the communication was initiated by the IFJ and the activity was staggered by 20 milliseconds—about the amount of time it would take for neurons to electrically convey information from the IFJ to either the FFA or PPA. The researchers believe that the IFJ holds onto the idea of the object that the brain is looking for and directs the correct part of the brain to look for it.

Further bolstering this idea, the researchers used an MRI-based method to measure the white matter that connects different brain regions and found that the IFJ is highly connected with both the FFA and PPA.

Members of Desimone's lab are now studying how the brain shifts its focus between different types of , such as vision and hearing. They are also investigating whether it might be possible to train people to better focus their by controlling the brain interactions involved in this process.

"You have to identify the basic neural mechanisms and do basic research studies, which sometimes generate ideas for things that could be of practical benefit," Desimone says. "It's too early to say whether this training is even going to work at all, but it's something that we're actively pursuing."

More information: Paper: "Neural Mechanisms of Object-Based Attention" Science, 2014.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Mapping objects in the brain

Dec 20, 2013

A brain region that responds to a particular category of objects is found to consist of small clusters of neurons encoding visual features of these objects.

Movies synchronize brains

Apr 01, 2014

When we watch a movie, our brains react to it immediately in a way similar to other people's brains.

Brain regions 'tune' activity to enable attention

Jan 15, 2014

The brain appears to synchronize the activity of different brain regions to make it possible for a person to pay attention or concentrate on a task, scientists at Washington University School of Medicine in ...

Recommended for you

Faster fish thanks to nMLF neurons

19 hours ago

As we walk along a street, we can stroll at a leisurely pace, walk quickly, or run. The various leg movements needed to do this are controlled by special neuron bundles in the spinal cord. It is not quite ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

russell_russell
1 / 5 (1) Apr 10, 2014
"Members of Desimone's lab are now studying how the brain shifts its focus between different types of sensory input, such as vision and hearing."

There is a nightmare word labeled cue. The word runs amok in meaning and wreaks havoc with all forms of interpretation and application.

Once you have cue written in mathematical concrete the paths of destruction left in the wake of the word cue and its usage ceases. Where science starts again is where the word cue is quantifiable. There is an unambiguous unit of measure for measuring all cues.
Formalize cue. Otherwise there will be no 'how' or handle on the word 'focus' much less the 'training' or learning of 'focus'.

The only to way control brain interactions is accessing what has been stored beforehand.
That was a c(l)ue.
russell_russell
not rated yet Apr 12, 2014
If your comment remains pending you defeat the purpose of a comment section. @Fabio