Economic evaluation of an osteoporosis screening campaign using FRAX

April 3, 2014

In new research presented at the World Congress on Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases today, investigators showed that an osteoporosis screening strategy using FRAX as a pre-screening tool is cost-effective if the follow up of the screening and medication adherence are optimized. FRAX (WHO Fracture Risk Assessment Tool) is a widely used algorithm to determine 10-year risk of fracture based on an individual's risk factors.

Researchers from the University of Maastricht and the University of Liège evaluated the cost-effectiveness of an osteoporosis screening campaign in the Province of Liège (Belgium). A previously validated microsimulation model was used to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed in costs (in €) per quality-adjusted life-year gained (QALY) gained, of the screening/treatment strategy versus no intervention. The screening/treatment strategy consisted of pre-screening using FRAX, followed by a bone densitometry for patients with a positive FRAX result and combined with a 5-year branded alendronate therapy for women diagnosed with osteoporosis ( (BMD) T-score≤−2.5).

The ICER for the screening/treatment strategy versus no intervention in the whole population (mean age=60 years) was estimated at €66,665 and €39,504 per QALY gained assuming real-world and full respectively. ICERs decreased to €55,517 and €28,520 in the population aged over 60 years (mean age= 65 years). The ICER of the screening strategy decreases when improving the follow-up of a positive screening and when increasing fracture risk. Using the price of generic alendronate, the cost-effectiveness improved to €50,880 and €32,293 assuming real-world and full adherence, respectively.

The authors therefore conclude that the osteoporosis screening strategy is cost-effective if the follow up of the screening and are optimized. Therefore, BMD should be performed in all individuals with posi¬tive FRAX score; individuals having a positive BMD diagnosis should be treated and adherence to therapy should be optimized.

Doctor Mickaël Hiligsmann, Assistant Professor in Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment at Maastricht University and Invited Professor at University of Liège, stated, "To further improve the cost-effectiveness of the screening strategy, we suggest targeting screening on women with one or more clinical , or on women aged 65 years and older".

Explore further: Fracture prediction methods may be useful for patients with diabetes

More information: OC 7 Economic evaluation of an osteoporosis screening campaign: using FRAX as a prescreening tool. M. Hiligsmann, W. Ben Sedrine, O. Bruyère, P. Jeholet, V. Misson, G. Pire, J.-Y. Reginster. Osteoporos Int. Vol 25, Suppl. 2, 2014

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Monkeys in Asia harbor virus from humans, other species

November 19, 2015

When it comes to spreading viruses, bats are thought to be among the worst. Now a new study of nearly 900 nonhuman primates in Bangladesh and Cambodia shows that macaques harbor more diverse astroviruses, which can cause ...

One-step test for hepatitis C virus infection developed

November 14, 2015

UC Irvine Health researchers have developed a cost-effective one-step test that screens, detects and confirms hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. Dr. Ke-Qin Hu, director of hepatology services, will present findings at the ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.