Artificial brains learn to adapt

Silvia Ferrari and her team at Duke University are creating new control and navigation systems for aircraft, robots and other engineered systems that emulate the brain's ability to adapt movement based on changing environmental conditions. They are designing artificial brains, known as spiking neural networks, that incorporate characteristic details of biological brains. Hippocampal cells (pictured) are especially important for navigation. Credit: Silvia Ferrari, Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University

For every thought or behavior, the brain erupts in a riot of activity, as thousands of cells communicate via electrical and chemical signals. Each nerve cell influences others within an intricate, interconnected neural network. And connections between brain cells change over time in response to our environment.

Despite supercomputer advances, the remains the most flexible, efficient information processing device in the world. Its exceptional performance inspires researchers to study and imitate it as an ideal of computing power.

Artificial neural networks

Computer models built to replicate how the brain processes, memorizes and/or retrieves information are called artificial neural networks. For decades, engineers and computer scientists have used artificial neural networks as an effective tool in many real-world problems involving tasks such as classification, estimation and control.

However, artificial neural networks do not take into consideration some of the basic characteristics of the human brain such as signal transmission delays between neurons, membrane potentials and synaptic currents.

A new generation of neural network models—called spiking neural networks—are designed to better model the dynamics of the brain, where neurons initiate signals to other neurons in their networks with a rapid spike in cell voltage. In modeling biological neurons, spiking neural networks may have the potential to mimick brain activities in simulations, enabling researchers to investigate neural networks in a biological context.

With funding from the National Science Foundation, Silvia Ferrari of the Laboratory for Intelligent Systems and Controls at Duke University uses a new variation of spiking neural networks to better replicate the behavioral learning processes of mammalian brains.

Behavioral learning involves the use of sensory feedback, such as vision, touch and sound, to improve motor performance and enable people to respond and quickly adapt to their changing environment.

Silvia Ferrari and her team at Duke University trained a virtual insect whose nervous system is modeled by a large spiking neural network. The virtual insect was trained with an algorithm that responds to sensory feedback, such as vision, touch and sound. The virtual insect was able to adapt to changing conditions as it navigated the environment for virtual food. Credit: Gary W. Meek, Georgia Tech

"Although existing engineering systems are very effective at controlling dynamics, they are not yet capable of handling unpredicted damages and failures handled by biological brains," Ferrari said.

How to teach an artificial brain

Ferrari's team is applying the spiking neural network model of learning on the fly to complex, critical , such as aircraft and power plants, with the goal of making them safer, more cost-efficient and easier to operate.

The team has constructed an algorithm that teaches spiking neural networks which information is relevant and how important each factor is to the overall goal. Using computer simulations, they've demonstrated the algorithm on aircraft flight control and robot navigation.

They started, however, with an insect.

"Our method has been tested by training a virtual insect to navigate in an unknown terrain and find foods," said Xu Zhang, a Ph.D. candidate who works on training the spiking neural network. "The nervous system was modeled by a large spiking neural network with unknown and random synaptic connections among those neurons."

Having tested their algorithm in computer simulations, they now are in the process of testing it biologically.

To do so, they will use lab-grown brain cells genetically altered to respond to certain types of light. This technique, called optogenetics, allows researchers to control how nerve cells communicate. When the light pattern changes, the neural activity changes.

Graduate student Xu Zhang, postdoc Greg Foderaro and Professor Silvia Ferrari (pictured left to right) at Duke University are translating the abilities of biological brains into computational capabilities to solve complex control and estimation problems. Credit: Silvia Ferrari, Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University

The researchers hope to observe that the living adapts over time to the light patterns and therefore have the ability to store and retrieve sensory information, just as human neuronal networks do.

Large-scale applications of small-scale findings

Uncovering the fundamental mechanisms responsible for the brain's learning processes can potentially yield insights into how humans learn—and make an everyday difference in people's lives.

Such insights may advance the development of certain artificial devices that can substitute for certain motor, sensory or cognitive abilities, particularly prosthetics that respond to feedback from the user and the environment. People with Parkinson's disease and epilepsy have already benefited from these types of devices.

"One of the most significant challenges in reverse-engineering the brain is to close the knowledge gap that exists between our understanding of biophysical models of neuron-level activity and the synaptic plasticity mechanisms that drive meaningful learning," said Greg Foderaro, a postdoctoral fellow involved the the research.

"We believe that by considering the networks at several levels—from computation to cell cultures to brains—we can greatly expand our understanding of the system of sensory and motor functions, as well as making a large step towards understanding the as a whole."

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Chips that mimic the brain

Jul 22, 2013

No computer works as efficiently as the human brain – so much so that building an artificial brain is the goal of many scientists. Neuroinformatics researchers from the University of Zurich and ETH Zurich have now made ...

Brain process takes paper shape

Feb 12, 2014

A paper-based device that mimics the electrochemical signalling in the human brain has been created by a group of researchers from China.

Delving deep into the brain

May 01, 2014

Launched in 2013, the national BRAIN Initiative aims to revolutionize our understanding of cognition by mapping the activity of every neuron in the human brain, revealing how brain circuits interact to create ...

Recommended for you

Why your favourite song takes you down memory lane

Aug 28, 2014

Music triggers different functions of the brain, which helps explain why listening to a song you like might be enjoyable but a favourite song may plunge you into nostalgia, scientists said on Thursday.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of brain boosts memory

Aug 28, 2014

Stimulating a particular region in the brain via non-invasive delivery of electrical current using magnetic pulses, called Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, improves memory, reports a new Northwestern Medicine ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Sinister1812
3 / 5 (2) May 16, 2014
Artificial intelligence in the making.
douglasjbender
1 / 5 (2) May 16, 2014
This needs to be shared more...especially the picture of the three researchers. It's important to see that not all Computer Scientists and Scientists and the like have to be geeky, ugly, or awkward..or male.
russell_russell
not rated yet May 18, 2014
The researchers hope to observe that the living neural network adapts over time to the light patterns and therefore have the ability to store and retrieve sensory information, just as human neuronal networks do.


If the damage and repair done (which the researchers here label adaptation in their model):
http://medicalxpr...ain.html

gives rise to expressions that no longer change over time they will have evidence of storage - or if you will - memory.

You need to represent DNA methylation as well otherwise all that is retrieved is volatile memory or volatile storage.

The researchers take an approach they believe will replicate their mentor - the neuron.
Be one of first to concede their success if their approach is right.