Expensive helmets do not improve outcomes in healthy babies with positional skull flattening

Babies who have skull deformation because they lie in the same position most of the time do not benefit from wearing a corrective helmet, finds research published today in BMJ.

There was no meaningful difference in skull shape at the age of two years between children treated with therapy helmet and those who received no active treatment. Both groups showed similar improvements although only a quarter made a full recovery to a normal head shape, according to the team of researchers based in The Netherlands.

Around one baby in five under the age of six months develops a skull deformation as a result of lying in the same position for long periods, a condition known as positional skull deformation or plagiocephaly. It has become more common since the launch of campaigns such as Back to Sleep, which encourage parents to lay their babies on their backs to sleep to reduce the risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).

Helmet therapy is a controversial treatment for this condition. It is not available on the NHS, meaning some parents opt to pay privately, with bills running to over £2,000. But it is commonly used in some countries – in the Netherlands, for example, 1 to 2% of all babies have helmet therapy.

There has been little previous research comparing helmet therapy with no so the researchers conducted the HEADS study – the first randomised trial to compare the long-term results of the two approaches.

They identified 84 healthy full-term babies who had a moderate or severe positional skull deformation – either plagiocephaly, where one side of the head becomes flattened and the ears can become misaligned, or brachycephaly, where the back of the head is flattened and the front of the skull may bulge.

Half the babies were randomly allocated to wear a rigid, custom-made, closely fitting helmet for 23 hours a day for a six-month period, starting at the age of six months. The other half had no treatment.

When the babies turned two years, detailed measurements of their head shape showed there was no significant difference in the degree of improvement in between the two groups. Some 25.6% of babies who had helmet therapy had a full recovery at two years of age, compared with 22.5% of those who had no treatment – again, not a significant difference.

All the parents whose babies wore a helmet reported side-effects. These included skin irritation (in 96% of babies), parents feeling hindered from cuddling their baby (77%), an unpleasant smell (76%), sweating (71%) and pain (33%).

The parents of both groups were generally satisfied with their child's head shape at two years of age – the average satisfaction score was 4.6 out of 5 among those whose babies had worn helmets compared with 4.4 among those whose babies had no treatment.

The researchers say more studies will be needed to confirm their findings but they conclude: 'Based on the effectiveness of helmet therapy, and the high prevalence of side-effects and high costs, we discourage the use of a helmet as a standard treatment for healthy infants with moderate to severe skull deformation.'

They point out that only a quarter of the babies in either group made a full recovery by the age of two years, meaning prevention is important. Previous studies suggest laying a baby on its tummy while awake protects against positional skull deformities. Still, it remains vital for parents to continue laying babies on their backs to sleep to reduce the risk of SIDS.

Positional skull deformities can develop in the early months of life because a ' skull is growing fast and the bones are still soft enough to change shape as a result of pressure.

In an accompanying editorial, Professor Brent Collett from the University of Washington School of Medicine, says "parents would want to know whether treatment would result in improvements above and beyond what would be expected by doing nothing at all."

He says that unfortunately this study suggests that helmets offer no treatment effect and as such there are several important next steps for future research.

He adds that it would be "of interest to learn whether children with the most severe PPB (positional plagiocephaly and brachycephaly), who were excluded from this trial, show meaningful improvement" and that additional work "incorporating behavioural and public health strategies to promote 'tummy time' and similar positioning strategies should be explored."

More information: Helmet therapy in infants with positional skull deformation: randomised controlled trial, BMJ, 2014.

Editorial: Helmet therapy for positional plagiocephaly and brachycephaly, BMJ, 2014.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

'Back to sleep' does not affect baby's ability to roll

Jun 03, 2013

Baby, keep on rolling. A campaign to put babies to bed on their backs to reduce the risk of sudden infant death syndrome has not impaired infants' rolling abilities, according to University of Alberta research.

Study results reinforce importance of helmet use

Jun 13, 2013

Bicycle helmets certified to Australia's national standard significantly reduce the causes of head, skull and brain injury - linear and angular head accelerations, and the impact force of a crash - a new ...

Can babies learn to read? No, NYU study finds

Feb 25, 2014

Can babies learn to read? While parents use DVDs and other media in an attempt to teach their infants to read, these tools don't instill reading skills in babies, a study by researchers at New York University's Steinhardt ...

Recommended for you

Study: Americans endure unwanted care near death

10 hours ago

Americans suffer needless discomfort and undergo unwanted and costly care as they die, in part because of a medical system ruled by "perverse incentives" for aggressive care and not enough conversation about what people want, ...

Failed Medicare payments law remains relevant

10 hours ago

In a new commentary in the journal JAMA Surgery, Dr. Eli Adashi recounts what he and other advocates saw as merits of the originally bipartisan Sustainable Growth Rate Repeal and Medicare Provider Paymen ...

User comments