Silencers refine sound localization

A new study by LMU researchers shows that sound localization involves a complex interplay between excitatory and inhibitory signals. Pinpointing of sound sources in space would be impossible without the tuning effect of the latter.

Did that lion's growl come from the left or the right? Or are there two of them out there? In the wild, the ability to perceive is of little use unless one can also pinpoint, and discriminate between, different sound sources in space. The capacity for is equally important for spatial orientation and vocal communication in humans. The underlying mechanism is known to depend on the processing of binaural signals in bilateral nerve-centers in the brainstem, where neural computations extract is extracted from them. "Each nerve-cell in the processing center receives not only excitatory but also inhibitory signals," says LMU neurobiologist Professor Benedikt Grothe. "We have now shown how the intrinsic silencing mechanism works at the , and why it plays such a crucial role in the localization of sounds."

Sound localization depends on the fact that the "ipsilateral" ear (the one closer to the sound source) perceives the incoming sound slightly earlier than the "contralateral" ear. Since the difference in reception time may be as brief as a fraction of a millisecond, the neural integration process in the time domain must be extremely precise. It was long thought that the direction of the source was determined solely by measuring the difference in the arrival times of excitatory signals from ipsilateral and contralateral ears. But, as Grothe explains: "Comparison of the excitatory signals alone is not sufficient to permit precise discrimination between impulses that arrive only microseconds apart."

Inhibition reduces background distortion

Using a highly sophisticated experimental design, Grothe and his team were able to demonstrate that spatial information is distilled from four different inputs, namely pairs of inhibitory and excitatory signals arriving from each ear. Moreover, the researchers were able to elucidate the nature of the processing mechanism with the help of a technique known as dynamic patch clamping. With this method, one can measure intracellularly, compute their combined effect in real time, and inject the resulting signal back into the cell. "This permits us to measure and manipulate electric currents within cells. By employing this highly complex approach, we were able to characterize the effects of both inhibitory and excitatory signals at the cellular level, and investigate the impact of their integration on the ability to localize sounds," Grothe explains.

It turns out that neural inhibition controls and dynamically adjusts the time-point at which a given cell becomes maximally active. Thanks to this fine-tuning mechanism, the difference in arrival times between the right and left signals can be determined more precisely than would otherwise be possible. "This is a very dynamic process, which is utilized great precision. Above all, it allows for very rapid resetting of the relationship between the magnitudes of excitatory and inhibitory signals, which would not be feasible on the basis of only two signals," Grothe adds. How the optimal timing offset is chosen remains unclear, but Grothe hopes that future studies will shed light on this phenomenon.

More information: "Glycinergic inhibition tunes coincidence detection in the auditory brainstem." Michael H. Myoga, et al. Nature Communications 5, Article number: 3790 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4790. Received 10 October 2013 Accepted 02 April 2014 Published 07 May 2014

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Feedback loops and localization errors

Oct 24, 2013

Neurobiologists at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich describe a feedback loop that modulates the processing of auditory signals in the brainstem in a frequency-dependent manner, and can lead to systematic ...

How nerve cells flexibly adapt to acoustic signals

Apr 11, 2014

In order to process acoustic information with high temporal fidelity, nerve cells may flexibly adapt their mode of operation according to the situation. At low input frequencies, they generate most outgoing ...

A brain filter for clear information transmission

Sep 06, 2012

Every activity in the brain involves the transfer of signals between neurons. Frequently, as many as one thousand signals rain down on a single neuron simultaneously. To ensure that precise signals are delivered, ...

Rare cell prevents rampant brain activity

Mar 02, 2007

One of the mysteries of the brain is how it avoids ending up in a state of chaos, something which happens only on exceptional occasions, when it can lead to epileptic fits. Scientists at Karolinska Institutet have now uncovered ...

Recommended for you

The brain treats real and imaginary objects in the same way

24 minutes ago

The human brain can select relevant objects from a flood of information and edit out what is irrelevant. It also knows which parts belong to a whole. If, for example, we direct our attention to the doors of a house, the brain ...

Research suggests brain's melatonin may trigger sleep

2 hours ago

If you walk into your local drug store and ask for a supplement to help you sleep, you might be directed to a bottle labeled "melatonin." The hormone supplement's use as a sleep aid is supported by anecdotal ...

New understanding of stroke damage may aid recovery

2 hours ago

Stroke can lead to a wide range of problems such as depression and difficulty moving, speaking and paying attention. Scientists have thought these issues were caused by damage to the brain's "computer processors"—cells ...

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.