High earners in a stock market game have brain patterns that can predict market bubbles

Read Montague, who directs the Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute's Computational Psychiatry Unit, plans to explore the promise of mindfulness training in moderating one's own brain activity, as well as research into real-world applications, including stock markets. Credit: Virginia Tech

If you're so smart, why aren't you rich? It may be that, when it comes to stock market success, your brain is heeding the wrong neural signals.

In a study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences this week, scientists at the Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute and Caltech found that, when they simulated market conditions for groups of investors, economic bubbles—in which the price of something could differ greatly from its actual value—invariably formed.

Even more remarkably, the researchers discovered a correlation between specific patterns and sensitivity to those bubbles.

"Stock market bubbles form when people collectively overvalue something, creating what economist Alan Greenspan once famously called 'irrational exuberance,'" said Read Montague, director of the Human Neuroimaging Laboratory at the Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute and one of the study's senior authors. "Our experiments showed how the collective behavior of market participants created price bubbles, suggesting that neural activity might offer biomarkers for the evolution of such bubbles."

Montague and colleagues enrolled 320 subjects in a market-trading simulation game. Up to two dozen participants played in each of 16 market sessions, with two or three participants simultaneously having their brains scanned using functional magnetic resonance imaging, or fMRI, a noninvasive technique that allows scientists to use microscopic blood-flow measurements as a proxy for brain activity.

At some point during the 50 trading periods of each session, a price bubble would invariably form and crash. The scientists had suspected that crowd cognition would result in some , though they had not expected it to happen every time.

What surprised the scientists even more were the distinctive brain activity patterns that emerged among the low earners and high earners.

Traders who bought more aggressively based on activity in one brain region, the nucleus accumbens, earned less.

In contrast, the high earners seemed to ignore nucleus accumbens activity in favor of the anterior insular cortex, a brain area active during bodily discomfort and unpleasant emotional states.

Just before a bubble peaked – as their brain scans were revealing an increased activity in the anterior insula – the high earners would begin to sell their shares.

The scientists believe the high earners' brain activity may represent a neural early warning signal of an impending crash.

"It's notoriously hard to identify bubbles and predict crashes by tracking price fluctuations alone," said Colin Camerer, a behavioral economist at Caltech and the study's other senior author. "This experimental method is ideal for understanding the neuropsychology of bubble formation, because we can control the fundamental values and use both prices and brain activity to figure out why bubbles form and crash."

The model may also shed light on other contexts in which groups – and individuals – overvalue something, Montague said.

"This neurobehavioral metric could be used to help quantify situations in which people place excessive value on poor choices, such as drug addiction, compulsive gambling, or overeating," he said.

Montague, who uses computational models to understand neuropsychiatric conditions, noted that the study could not have been conducted without two relatively new additions to the neuroscientist's toolbox: fMRI and hyperscanning.

Hyperscanning, a cloud-based technique that enables multiple subjects in different brain scanners to interact in real time, whether across rooms or across continents, allows scientists to study live human interactions.

Montague likens the technique, which he and his team developed just over a decade ago, to being able to eavesdrop on an entire cocktail party conversation, rather than the monologue fMRI enables.

Why eavesdrop at all?

"We're wired to be social," Montague said. "People are exquisitely sensitive to the social gestures of others, and understanding that sensitivity may provide important clues not just to personal and group interactions, but to mental disorders as well. At the heart of many mental disorders is a deficit in the ability to interact with others."

Montague, who also directs the Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute's Computational Psychiatry Unit, plans to explore the promise of mindfulness training in moderating one's own brain activity, as well as research into real-world applications, including stock markets.

"The brain can provide us with valuable information about what someone may be perceiving about the market and what they're likely to do next," Montague said. "That gut feeling the high earners had? It was all in their heads."

More information: "Irrational exuberance and neural crash warning signals during endogenous experimental market bubbles," by Alec Smith, Terry Lohrenz, Justin King, Read Montague, and Colin Camerer, PNAS, www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1318416111

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

'Chatty' cells help build the brain

10 hours ago

The cerebral cortex, which controls higher processes such as perception, thought and cognition, is the most complex structure in the mammalian central nervous system. Although much is known about the intricate ...

'Trigger' for stress processes discovered in the brain

Nov 27, 2014

At the Center for Brain Research at the MedUni Vienna an important factor for stress has been identified in collaboration with the Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm (Sweden). This is the protein secretagogin ...

New research supporting stroke rehabilitation

Nov 26, 2014

Using world-leading research methods, the team of Dr David Wright and Prof Paul Holmes, working with Dr Jacqueline Williams from the Victoria University in Melbourne, studied activity in an area of the brain ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

thingumbobesquire
1 / 5 (1) Jul 08, 2014
What a farce. Modern day haruspication, pretending to be science.
julianpenrod
1 / 5 (1) Jul 08, 2014
Among other things, "science" trolling the fiction that economics is a natural process, guided by its own rules. Dummy corporations, "creative bookkeeping", market manipulation, programmed obsolescence all are testament to the fact that business is a fraud. Those with all the money makes the market appear to do what they want to they can try to take everything that isn't nailed down. Like corrupt "electoral boards" publish the numbers the New World Order wants published to put the person they want in office!
Note, among other things, the mocking comment, "Why aren't you rich?" Well, if this brain activity makes you rich, why weren't the participants in the "experiment" rich enough to be doing something else?
Also, they talk about participants selling just before a bubble burst because they "sensed" it would. Massive selling causes bubbles to burst! They didn't "sense" it, they caused it!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.