Journal raises concern about blood-thinning drug

July 23, 2014

A medical journal raised concerns Wednesday about a blood-thinning drug widely used by people at risk of stroke, accusing its manufacturer of concealing safety data and regulators of laxness.

A key selling point of the known as dabigatran or Pradaxa was that it required no blood-level monitoring, as does competitor warfarin.

Dabigatran's maker, Boehringer Ingelheim, had said the drug was better than warfarin at reducing stroke in people with , with a similar risk of major bleeds, according to the British Medical Journal (BMJ).

Based on its own probe, the journal accused Boehringer of concealing information that blood-level monitoring could in fact reduce major bleeds by up to 30-40 percent compared to warfarin.

"The BMJ has found that neither doctors nor regulators have ever been aware of these calculations," said a statement.

Irregular heart rhythm (atrial fibrillation) affects about 800,000 Britons and over three million Americans.

According to BMJ investigations editor Deborah Cohen, who conducted the research, millions of people take the anti-clotting drug, with blood levels found to vary greatly between patients.

"These analyses suggest that dabigatran could be made safer," she told AFP by email.

A one-off test may be sufficient to check how a particular patient was reacting to the drug, which seeks to keep the blood thin enough to protect against stroke, but not so thin to pose a major bleed risk.

The BMJ said the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA), in 2010 and 2011 respectively, approved the drug without the need for blood tests, despite concerns.

"Once licensed, dabigatran proved a financial success, but by the end of 2011 concerns about fatal bleeds were beginning to emerge," it wrote.

In May, the manufacturer settled for $650 million (480 million euros) in 4,000 cases in the United States linked to use of its blood-thinner.

The FDA told AFP its approval of the drug had been based on information supplied by Boehringer.

"The FDA is constantly examining product labelling to make sure the label reflects the current knowledge with regard to the benefits and risks of the product," the agency said, adding it had published "several" drug safety tips about Pradaxa over the years.

The EMA said it was evaluating whether any relevant information had not been submitted.

"In case of any new evidence, the EMA will take action as necessary to guarantee the safety of patients," it said.

Boehringer UK in a tweet advised patients not to stop taking the drug, but consult their doctor if they were concerned.

"We remain confident in our medicine's benefits and safety profile which have been reaffirmed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and others," it tweeted.

Explore further: Anti-clot drug recommended for new approval in EU

Related Stories

Anti-clot drug recommended for new approval in EU

September 21, 2012

(AP)—Advisers to European Union regulators have recommended approval of a new anti-clotting drug for use by adults with a common irregular heart rhythm that boosts risk of strokes or blood clots, drugmakers Bristol-Myers ...

New blood thinner beats older drug for vein clots

February 20, 2013

(HealthDay)—People who need to take a blood thinner because they've had a clot in the deep veins of their legs appear to do better with the new drug Pradaxa (dibigatran) than with the older drug warfarin, researchers report.

French families file suit over alleged blood-thinner deaths

October 9, 2013

The families of four elderly people who died while taking an anti-clotting drug have filed a legal complaint against France's drugs safety body and Germany-based drugmaker Boehringer Ingelheim, their lawyers said Wednesday.

Recommended for you

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.