Do we really only use 10% of our brain?

by Amy Reichelt, The Conversation

As the new film Lucy, starring Scarlett Johansson and Morgan Freeman is set to be released in the cinemas this week, I feel I should attempt to dispel the unfounded premise of the film – that we only use 10% of our brains. Let me state that there is no scientific evidence that supports this statement, it is simply a myth.

The concept behind the film is that through the administration of a new cognitive enhancing drug, our female lead character, Lucy, becomes able to harness powerful mental capabilities and enhanced physical abilities. These include telekinesis, mental time travel and being able to absorb information instantaneously. Viewed as such, the should be essentially capable of these feats, we just fail to push our capacity. So if we can unlock the "unused" 90% of the we too could be geniuses with super powers?

The beginnings of the myth

The 10% myth may have begun in the early 1900's when the neurosurgeon Karl Lashley removed portions of the brains of rats who were trained to navigate around a maze. He found that he could damage areas of the cerebral cortex and the rats were still able to perform the task correctly, as well as behave normally. The greater the area of damage, the more impaired the rats were at the task. However, these deficits could be recovered through additional maze training and time.

Lashley proposed the principle of "equipotentiality", meaning that different areas of the brain can carry out the same functions. He added to this the principle of "mass action" – in which the brain acts as a whole in many types of learning.

Function and dysfunction of the brain

But we know now that the brain is not a uniform structure. A small stroke can be devastating. Depending on the area damaged, different brain functions are disrupted. For instance injury to the motor cortex can lead to paralysis on one side of the body, damage to a small region of the frontal lobe known as Broca's area results in being unable to speak. Although there is some recovery of certain functions over time due to plasticity, where alternative areas of the brain can compensate for the damaged regions, recovery is rarely complete.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

Neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinson's Disease target distinct brain regions. Memory deficits in Alzheimer's Disease are due to deterioration of the hippocampus, and motor dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease by loss of dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra. There is no recovery of function in these diseases, as the damage spreads no compensatory mechanisms step in.

We understand now that different brain areas function both separately and together to allow us to coordinate complex tasks. So at any moment we could be using 10% or 100% of our brain, depending on what we are doing.

To carry out actions as mundane as buying a coffee we have to use higher cognitive or executive functions to decide what we want, speech to communicate our choice, advanced cognitive processes to calculate the cost and fine motor skills to hand over the money. So many separate brain areas must work together to co-ordinate behaviour. Damage to a small region can cause massive disruption to the functional networks required.

The hungry brain

Our brains are much more complex than Lashley's lab rats. The average human brain comprises of only 2% of our body mass, but uses 20% of our energy, much more than expected for our relative brain size. The cerebrum performs cognitive functions, the cerebellum controls motor coordination and the brainstem maintains essential unconscious functions such as breathing. Our brains are relatively large when compared to other animals, we wouldn't have evolved such an energy hungry and large brain unless we required it.

The majority of the energy consumed by the brain powers millions of neurons communicating with each other through electrical nerve impulses. This forms a control network that connects functionally distinct regions. If we did really only use 10% of our brain it wouldn't make sense to have such a large amount of energy powering an idle 90%.

We probably understand less than 10% of how the brain functions

Neuroscientists are still trying to understand how the brain functions. Currently, a major focus of research is into the role of different types of cells in the brain. In the brain only 10% of the cells are neurons; the other 90% are glial cells or astrocytes. These cells appear to be important in connecting neurons together, but recent research indicates they may be even more functionally important, particularly in forming memories.

Scientists are still trying to unlock the secrets of the brain. We do not yet understand what parts of the brain interact together to generate consciousness, or how our brain functions as a whole to control complex behaviours.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

A new cause of mental disease?

Jul 23, 2014

Astrocytes, the cells that make the background of the brain and support neurons, might be behind mental disorders such as depression and schizophrenia, according to new research by a Portuguese team from ...

Even mild traumatic brain injury may cause brain damage

Jul 16, 2014

Even mild traumatic brain injury may cause brain damage and thinking and memory problems, according to a study published in the July 16, 2014, online issue of Neurology, the medical journal of the American Academy of Neu ...

Can a virtual brain replace lab rats?

Feb 14, 2014

Testing the effects of drugs on a simulated brain could lead to breakthrough treatments for neurological disorders such as Parkinson's, Huntington's and Alzheimer's disease.

Brainstem discovered as important relay site after stroke

Feb 25, 2014

Around 16,000 people in Switzerland suffer a stroke every year. Often the result of a sudden occlusion of a vessel supplying the brain, it is the most frequent live-threatening neurological disorder. In most cases, it has ...

Recommended for you

Emotional adjustment following traumatic brain injury

10 hours ago

Life after a traumatic brain injury resulting from a car accident, a bad fall or a neurodegenerative disease changes a person forever. But the injury doesn't solely affect the survivor – the lives of their spouse or partner ...

New ALS associated gene identified using innovative strategy

Oct 22, 2014

Using an innovative exome sequencing strategy, a team of international scientists led by John Landers, PhD, at the University of Massachusetts Medical School has shown that TUBA4A, the gene encoding the Tubulin Alpha 4A protein, ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

MrVibrating
5 / 5 (1) Aug 02, 2014
Great article, although it's depressing that such an obviously-suspect myth should still find widespread belief.

I wasn't aware of Lashley's work or involvement in the issue, however it seems to me that another key element lies in our egalitarian values - our conviction that the great and good aren't necessarily more capable than the rest of us, but have simply applied themselves more diligently; that there's a potential president, pop star or genius in all of us, if only we had the time and energy, opportunity and nurturing etc.

In short, we like to console ourselves that we're happy only fulfilling 10% of our potential, in order to circumvent any challenging notions that those who go further are somehow intrinsically superior..
Moebius
not rated yet Aug 03, 2014
I saw an english documentary once about these people who had had a disease that rendered most of their brain non-functional (EEG). They were all basically normal people, one was a teacher.

Scientists can be so dumb. If you had no idea how a motor works would you study a lawn mower engine or a turbocharged, double overhead cam, fuel injected V-12? Why they study the human brain when they have no idea how a brain works seems like a waste of time to me. They should be studying the smallest one they can find. There are a couple who post here.