Why ordinary people become heroes

Why ordinary people become heroes
Flinders PhD candidate Anna Hall is investigating the role of bystanders in medical emergencies. Credit: Shutterstock.

You've just witnessed a horrific car crash. Your heart is pounding, you're in shock. And the decision you make in the next thirty seconds could be the difference between life and death.

Will you help, or walk away?

The factors influencing a person's decision to provide assistance, or not, in a life-threatening are being explored in a new Flinders University study.

As part of her PhD, Anna Hall from Flinders' School of Nursing and Midwifery will interview witnesses to a range of real-life emergencies, including car accidents, heart attacks, fires and falls, to find out what motivated their decision to intervene before ambulance crews arrived on scene.

With ambulance on the rise due to increasing callouts, Ms Hall said the help provided by bystanders in the minutes before arrive could save a life.

"Nationally, there are more than 1.4 million every year," Ms Hall said.

"The number of callouts is increasing so ambulance response times are getting longer, with response times varying from 8.5 to 19.7 minutes in capital cities and 8.3 to 23.1 minutes in South Australia," she said.

"These extended response times mean that people who are at the emergency scene may be the difference between life and death for the victims.

"While paramedics do an incredible job, the victims still need to be alive when the paramedics arrive. Anything bystanders can do to help the victim helps the paramedics."

While she is still recruiting interview participants, Ms Hall said she suspects a range of factors influence a bystander's decision-making process, including shock and the fear of being sued.

"Witnessing a medical emergency can be extremely traumatic – these witnesses are potentially faced with broken bones, severed limbs, unconscious people or death.

"Sometimes they're in shock so they freeze. Sometimes they don't know what to do – or think they'll do more harm than good – and sometimes they're scared of being sued, which is a myth because Good Samaritan laws protect people from undue liability when they provide assistance, advice or care to another person in an emergency."

Now in her second year of research, Ms Hall says she was inspired to explore the issue after her brother, Joe, received life-saving care from a bystander following a serious car crash in 2009.

"He wouldn't be alive if it weren't for the witness who stopped to help when other people kept driving.

"It got me thinking, why do some people decide to help while others turn away?"

Study participants will receive information about counselling services, Ms Hall said, in case they are feeling traumatised by their experience.

"I'll be interviewing ordinary, everyday people who aren't health workers so it's important to conduct the research sensitively and provide pathways to support if they are suffering post-traumatic stress."

By gaining insights into why people choose to help or not, Ms Hall says she hopes her research will inform policy and debate on the role of bystanders in emergencies.

"Research shows that if a victim of an emergency receives first-aid before paramedics arrive they have an increased chance of survival.

"If we understand what goes through peoples' minds at the scene of an emergency we could potentially develop guidelines to alleviate their fears and ultimately encourage more people to help."

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

3Qs: Access expands to opioid overdose antidote

Mar 06, 2014

Drug overdoses are reportedly on the rise both locally and nationally. The Massachusetts State Police has reported 185 fatalities since Nov. 1, which doesn't include the large cities of Boston, Springfield, and Worcester. ...

Paramedics could help close state's health-care gaps

Aug 16, 2013

In a new report, the UC Davis Institute for Population Health Improvement (IPHI) recommends that the state launch pilot programs to test a new model of community-based health care that would expand the role of paramedics ...

Recommended for you

Testosterone testing has increased in recent years

Nov 21, 2014

(HealthDay)—There has been a recent increase in the rate of testosterone testing, with more testing seen in men with comorbidities associated with hypogonadism, according to research published online Nov. ...

AMA: Hospital staff should consider impact of CMS rule

Nov 21, 2014

(HealthDay)—Hospital medical staff members need to consider the impact of a final rule issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that revised the conditions of participation for hospitals ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

freethinking
1 / 5 (2) Aug 18, 2014
The more conservative a person is, the more likely they are to help.
The more liberal a person is, the less likely they are to help.
The more progressive a person is, the more likely they are to rob and steal from the victim.

paul_ringo0815
5 / 5 (2) Aug 19, 2014
freethinking, What is that information based on? Interesting but I'm wondering about how that was documented. Thanks.
freethinking
1 / 5 (2) Aug 19, 2014
Paul,

http://dailycalle...iberals/

http://www.examin...e-cities

Marc Meredith, PhD, Assistant Professor of Political Science and Business Economics at the University of Pennsylvania, and Michael Morse, Research Fellow at Stanford Law School, stated the following in their Nov. 18, 2013 article "Do Voting Rights Notification Laws Increase Ex-Felon Turnout?," published in the Annals of the American Academy of Political Science:

"[In New York] ex-felons who are registered overwhelmingly register as Democrats. Of those discharge records that match to at least one voter file record, 61.5 percent match only to Democratic voter records. In contrast, 25.5 percent match only to voter records with no affiliation or an affiliation with a minor party, while 9 percent match only to Republican voter records.
freethinking
1 / 5 (2) Aug 19, 2014
In the next election the only ones who will vote Democrat are:
1. The ignorant
2. Those that are just plain stupid.
3. The dead
4. Criminals
5. Criminal aliens
6. and Thief's
zaxxon451
5 / 5 (1) Aug 25, 2014
Paul,
http://dailycalle...iberals/


Please. Not only does Brooks use faulty methodology claiming causation, when there is only evidence of correlation, he also compares apples to oranges. Comparing the generosity of religious conservatives to secular liberals is nonsense. These conservatives are much more likely to regularly attend church and donate every Sunday (or more). Their deity requires at least 10% of their income. Donating to keep yourself in the good graces of your god is not generosity. It's doing what's required by your religion.
Vietvet
5 / 5 (1) Aug 25, 2014
Paul,
http://dailycalle...iberals/


Please. Not only does Brooks use faulty methodology claiming causation, when there is only evidence of correlation, he also compares apples to oranges. Comparing the generosity of religious conservatives to secular liberals is nonsense. These conservatives are much more likely to regularly attend church and donate every Sunday (or more). Their deity requires at least 10% of their income. Donating to keep yourself in the good graces of your god is not generosity. It's doing what's required by your religion.


Your sincere effort to reason with free(non)thinker is a waste of time. Facts wont dissuade his closed mind point of view.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.