CRP/ESR disagreement common in infection, inflammation

CRP/ESR disagreement common in infection, inflammation

(HealthDay)—For patients with suspected infection or inflammation, C-reactive protein (CRP)/erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) disagreement is common, according to a study published online Dec. 31 in the International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases.

Stephanie Sbong, M.D., and Mark Feldman, M.D., from the Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas, examined simultaneously ordered CRP and ESR results for 70 with suspected infection or . The authors examined CRP/ESR disagreements and their stability in repeat testing in adults who had been tested on three separate occasions.

The researchers found that in 20 percent of there were initial CRP/ESR disagreements. Of these 14 patients, only four had stable disagreements throughout the study, while 10 patients later exhibited CRP/ESR agreements. Of the 56 patients with initial CRP/ESR agreement, on subsequent testing, 10 developed CRP/ESR disagreements.

"Three mechanisms were identified to explain CRP/ESR disagreements: (i) slight fluctuations in the CRP and ESR around the upper limits of normal for these tests; (ii) development of an intercurrent illness; and (iii) different time courses of CRP and ESR elevations, in which the CRP rose and fell faster than the ESR," the authors write.

More information: Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2015 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: CRP/ESR disagreement common in infection, inflammation (2015, January 16) retrieved 25 April 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2015-01-crpesr-disagreement-common-infection-inflammation.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Optimal ESR and CRP cut-off values based on new criteria for periprosthetic joint infection

19 shares

Feedback to editors