Who is the fairest of them all? Research reveals we hold a rose-tinted view of our own morality

Who is the fairest of them all? Research reveals we hold a rose-tinted view of our own morality
Who is the fairest of them all? Holding a mirror to our own moral superiority. Credit: Royal Holloway, University of London

Recent research published in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science has shown that when evaluating their own morality, people will almost always judge themselves as morally superior to the average person.

This better-than-average phenomenon reflects peoples' overly positive evaluation of themselves - a "positive illusion" - which may have consequences for decision making and conflict.

If everyone is special, no one is

The researchers from Royal Holloway, University of London's Department of Psychology asked participants to judge a series of human qualities as to how desirable those traits were, how much they themselves possessed those traits, and how much they thought the possessed the traits. These qualities included descriptors such as hard-working, sociable, honest, trustworthy and prejudiced.

Nearly all participants rated themselves highly on the , but rated the average person as distinctly less so. This discrepancy between the true average (what everyone rated themselves as) and the perceived average, (what everyone rated the average person as), led the researchers to conclude that, "nearly all participants irrationally inflated their moral qualities".

Previous research in the field has argued that such 'positive illusions' promote individual wellbeing. However, this study revealed that even those individuals with relatively low self-esteem identified themselves as morally superior to the average person.

Paths paved with good intentions

Ben Tappin, lead author on the paper and postgraduate within Royal Holloway's Department of Psychology, explained:

"Our research indicates that most people believe they are just, virtuous and moral – more so than the average person, and, in particular, that this phenomenon may be irrational. Recognising we build a 'positive illusion' of our own goodness relative to the average person is important, especially when we are living in times of political fracturing and moral conflict. If we keep telling ourselves our beliefs, actions and traits are better than a majority of others' you can see how it becomes easy to lose sight of the validity of opposing views, and our own fallibility."

Dr Ryan McKay, Principal Investigator at Royal Holloway's Morality and Beliefs Lab commented:

"While this study doesn't look at why people think this way, or the consequences of this phenomenon, it raises important questions about how these judgments affect our lives – from personal relationships and intergroup relations, to work and prosocial behaviour. Ongoing research in our lab is looking into these issues, including how an illusion of superiority manifests itself in groups as well as individuals."

The results of this research formed part of the debate on this week's BBC Radio 4 Moral Maze, which explored the self-deception of morality and the 'self-deception that helps maintain our self-esteem'.

More information: B. M. Tappin et al. The Illusion of Moral Superiority, Social Psychological and Personality Science (2016). DOI: 10.1177/1948550616673878

Citation: Who is the fairest of them all? Research reveals we hold a rose-tinted view of our own morality (2016, November 24) retrieved 23 April 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-11-fairest-reveals-rose-tinted-view-morality.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Reliance on reason, evidence as a moral issue measured in study

6 shares

Feedback to editors