<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://medicalxpress.com/tmpl/default/css/default/feedRSS.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
<title>Medical Xpress: PHYSorg news tagged with: breast cancer screening</title>
<link>http://medicalxpress.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language> 
<description>Medical Xpress internet news portal provides the latest news on Health and Medicine.</description>

 <item>
     <title>Costly breast cancer screenings don't add up to better outcomes</title>
   	 <description>Even though Medicare spends over $1 billion per year on breast cancer screenings such as a mammography, there is no evidence that higher spending benefits older women, researchers at Yale School of Medicine found in a study published Online First by JAMA Internal Medicine.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-01-costly-breast-cancer-screenings-dont.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 16:00:13 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news276772358</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Ultrasound could offer affordable, accessible breast cancer screening</title>
   	 <description>Ultrasound screening could be a more affordable and convenient way to detect early breast cancers in women, especially for those in countries where there is little access to mammograms, according to University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine research presented today at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America in Chicago. These results are a component of a multinational study that looked at ultrasound as an adjunct to screening mammography.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-11-ultrasound-accessible-breast-cancer-screening.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 07:33:34 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news273223991</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Gene that causes tumor disorder linked to increased breast cancer risk</title>
   	 <description>New Johns Hopkins research showing a more than four-fold increase in the incidence of breast cancer in women with neurofibromatosis-1 (NF1) adds to growing evidence that women with this rare genetic disorder may benefit from early breast cancer screening with mammograms beginning at age 40, and manual breast exams as early as adolescence.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-11-gene-tumor-disorder-linked-breast.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 04:49:49 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news273214178</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Study finds mammograms lead to unneeded treatment</title>
   	 <description>Mammograms have done surprisingly little to catch deadly breast cancers before they spread, a big U.S. study finds. At the same time, more than a million women have been treated for cancers that never would have threatened their lives, researchers estimate.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-11-mammograms-unneeded-treatment.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:28:33 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news272741303</guid>
	 <media:thumbnail url="http://s.ph-cdn.com/newman/gfx/news/tmb/2012/studyfindsma.jpg" width="90" height="90" />
</item>
<item>
     <title>Novel breast screening technology increases diagnostic accuracy</title>
   	 <description>The addition of three-dimensional breast imaging—a technology called tomosynthesis—to standard digital mammography significantly increases radiologists' diagnostic accuracy while reducing false positive recall rates, according to the results of a multi-center study published in Radiology.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-11-breast-screening-technology-diagnostic-accuracy.html</link>
	 <category>Other</category>
	 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:07 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news272563006</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Stereoscopic mammography could reduce recall rate</title>
   	 <description>A new three-dimensional (3-D) digital mammography technique has the potential to significantly improve the accuracy of breast cancer screening, according to a study published in Radiology.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-11-stereoscopic-mammography-recall.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 00:00:07 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news271955825</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Mammograms: For 1 life saved, 3 women overtreated</title>
   	 <description>(AP)—Breast cancer screening for women over 50 saves lives, an independent panel in Britain has concluded, confirming findings in U.S. and other studies.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-10-mammograms-life-women-overtreated.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 20:00:01 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news270740828</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Gene polymorphisms identified that are responsible for breast density and cancer risk</title>
   	 <description>It has long been known that breast density, or mammographic density, is a strong risk factor for breast cancer, and that estrogen and progestin hormone therapy increases dense breast tissue. Now, a study published in BioMed Central's open access journal Breast Cancer Research has identified several gene variants in hormone metabolism and growth factor pathways that may be associated with breast density and, hence, breast cancer risk.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-10-gene-polymorphisms-responsible-breast-density.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:40:00 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news270264952</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>New X-ray breast cancer imaging possible with 25 times reduced radiation dose</title>
   	 <description>Scientists have developed a way to produce three-dimensional X-ray images of the breast at a radiation dose that is lower than the 2D radiographies used in clinics today. The new method enables the production of 3D diagnostic computed tomography (CT) images with a spatial resolution 2-3 times higher than present hospital scanners, but with a radiation dose that is about 25 times lower. This breakthrough has the potential to overcome the main obstacle limiting conventional CT imaging of the breast: the high radiosensitivity of the breast glandular tissue. Synchrotron X-rays at the Medical station of the ESRF have been used for testing the technique which, once deployed in hospitals, will make CT scans a diagnostic tool to complement dual view mammography.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-10-x-ray-breast-cancer-imaging-dose.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:00:08 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news270135988</guid>
	 <media:thumbnail url="http://s.ph-cdn.com/newman/gfx/news/tmb/2012/5-breastcancer.jpg" width="90" height="90" />
</item>
<item>
     <title>Doctors who go digital provide higher quality healthcare</title>
   	 <description>The use of electronic health records is linked to significantly higher quality care, according to a new study by Lisa Kern and her team, from the Health Information Technology Evaluation Collaborative in the US. Their work appears online in the Journal of General Internal Medicine, published by Springer.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-10-doctors-digital-higher-quality-healthcare.html</link>
	 <category>Health</category>
	 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:10:00 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news269698183</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Digital mammography improves population-based breast cancer screening</title>
   	 <description>New research from the Netherlands shows that the switch from screen film mammography (SFM) to digital mammography (DM) in large, population-based breast cancer screening programs improves the detection of life-threatening cancer without significantly increasing detection of clinically insignificant disease. Results of the study are published online in the journal Radiology.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-10-digital-mammography-population-based-breast-cancer.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 00:00:08 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news268330160</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Gene mutation study results could lead to less expensive, more accessible breast and ovarian cancer screening</title>
   	 <description>(Medical Xpress)—Researchers conducting a study of gene mutations that increase a woman's likelihood of breast and ovarian cancers have made a discovery that could open doors to less expensive and more accessible breast and ovarian cancer screening. Additionally, the surprising study results may also explain how human embryos with these breast cancer mutations survive.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-09-gene-mutation-results-expensive-accessible.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:47:09 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news267090369</guid>
	 <media:thumbnail url="http://s.ph-cdn.com/newman/gfx/news/tmb/2012/genemutation.gif" width="90" height="90" />
</item>
<item>
     <title>First comprehensive review of European breast cancer screening programs finds benefits outweigh harm</title>
   	 <description>A major review of breast cancer screening services in Europe, jointly led by researchers at Queen Mary, University of London, has concluded that the benefits of screening in terms of lives saved outweigh the harms caused by over-diagnosis.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-09-comprehensive-european-breast-cancer-screening.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 19:00:02 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news266688660</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Some screens miss spread of breast cancer: study</title>
   	 <description>(HealthDay)—In a new study, three types of screening methods used to determine whether breast cancer has spread to other parts of the body only spotted a small portion of tumors that had done so.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-09-screens-breast-cancer.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:50:01 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news266666109</guid>
	 <media:thumbnail url="http://s.ph-cdn.com/newman/gfx/news/tmb/2012/somescreensm.jpg" width="90" height="90" />
</item>
<item>
     <title>ASBS: mammography beats infrared screening for breast CA</title>
   	 <description>(HealthDay) -- The No Touch Breast Scan (NTBS), an infrared thermography modality, is not as reliable as mammography for detecting breast cancer, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Breast Surgeons, held from May 2 to 6 in Phoenix.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-05-asbs-mammography-infrared-screening-breast.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 05:20:01 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news255585220</guid>
	 <media:thumbnail url="http://s.ph-cdn.com/newman/gfx/news/tmb/2012/asbsmammogra.jpg" width="90" height="90" />
</item>
<item>
     <title>Automated breast ultrasound dramatically reduces physician interpretation time</title>
   	 <description>Automated breast ultrasound takes an average three minutes of physician time, allowing for quick and more complete breast cancer screening of asymptomatic women with dense breast tissue, a new study shows.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-05-automated-breast-ultrasound-physician.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 02:57:10 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news255232444</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>'No family history' not a good reason for women 40-49 to stop yearly screening mammograms</title>
   	 <description>More than half the women aged 40-49 diagnosed with breast cancer on screening mammography report no family history, a new study shows.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-05-family-history-good-women-.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 02:46:57 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news255232000</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Studies may offer clarity on mammograms</title>
   	 <description>After several years of upheaval over the best way to conduct breast cancer screening, researchers are working to find clarity over when women should begin getting mammograms, how often, and at what cost. A pair of new studies clears up some of the uncertainty by finding that women who have a mother or sister diagnosed with breast cancer, or those who have unusually dense breast tissue, should have their first test at age 40 and repeat the exam at least once every other year.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-05-clarity-mammograms.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 12:20:01 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news255089371</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Risk factors may inform breast cancer screening</title>
   	 <description>Choosing when to start regular breast cancer screening is a complicated decision for individual women and their providers. For most women, increasing age is the biggest risk factor for breast cancer, which is much more common at age 60 than at 40. But two new articles on other risk factors may inform guidelines and clinical practice about screening mammography from age 40 to 49.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-04-factors-breast-cancer-screening.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:30:01 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news255023036</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Biomarker family found for chemo resistant breast cancers</title>
   	 <description>Biomarkers which could help to predict resistance to chemotherapy in breast cancer patients have been identified by researchers from the University of Hull, UK.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-04-biomarker-family-chemo-resistant-breast.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:09:30 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news253443952</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>20-year results from breast cancer screening program show a significant drop in deaths, limited harm and reasonable cost</title>
   	 <description>Results from one of the longest-running national breast cancer screening programmes have shown that it has contributed to a drop in deaths from the disease, that any harm caused by the screening, such as false positives and over-diagnosis, has been limited, and that the costs have been reasonable.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-03-year-results-breast-cancer-screening.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:43:13 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news251538167</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Breast cancer screening and better treatment both help to save significant numbers of lives</title>
   	 <description>A Dutch study of the effectiveness of breast cancer screening shows that, even with improved treatments for the disease, population-based mammography programmes still save a significant number of lives.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-03-breast-cancer-screening-treatment-significant.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:22:37 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news251536947</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>MRI screening for women with a family history of breast cancer but no genetic predisposition</title>
   	 <description>Adding magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to standard breast cancer screening approaches is expensive, though it could be cost effective for a group of women who may not have inherited the breast cancer susceptibility genes, but who have a familial risk of developing the disease. This is the conclusion of research presented at the eighth European Breast Cancer Conference (EBCC-8) today.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-03-mri-screening-women-family-history.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:21:28 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news251536882</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>New screening technique could provide more reliable breast cancer detection</title>
   	 <description>Scientists have successfully completed an initial trial of a new, potentially more reliable, technique for screening breast cancer using ultrasound. The team at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL), the UK's National Measurement Institute, working with the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, are now looking to develop the technique into a clinical device.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-03-screening-technique-reliable-breast-cancer.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:44:51 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news249907483</guid>
	 <media:thumbnail url="http://s.ph-cdn.com/newman/gfx/news/tmb/2012/ultrasoundsc.jpg" width="90" height="90" />
</item>
<item>
     <title>Nutrient found in dark meat of poultry, some seafood, may have cardiovascular benefits</title>
   	 <description>A nutrient found in the dark meat of poultry may provide protection against coronary heart disease (CHD) in women with high cholesterol, according to a study by researchers at NYU Langone Medical Center.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-03-nutrient-dark-meat-poultry-seafood.html</link>
	 <category>Health</category>
	 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 11:30:42 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news249823819</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>New study supports claim that breast screening may be causing more harm than good</title>
   	 <description>A new study published on bmj.com today supports the claim that the introduction of breast cancer screening in the UK may have caused more harm than good.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-12-breast-screening-good.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 03:10:50 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news242620993</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Mammography screening reduced risk for death from breast cancer by half</title>
   	 <description>A new case-control study published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers &amp; Prevention, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, shows that women who participated in at least three screening mammograms had a 49 percent lower risk for breast cancer mortality.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-12-mammography-screening-death-breast-cancer.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:37:24 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news242401021</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>New study supports mammography screening at 40</title>
   	 <description>Women in their 40s with no family history of breast cancer are just as likely to develop invasive breast cancer as are women with a family history of the disease, according to a study presented today at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). These findings indicate that women in this age group would benefit from annual screening mammography.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-11-mammography-screening.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 01:47:19 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news241753625</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>Canadian breast cancer screening guidelines would cost thousands of lives</title>
   	 <description>The American College of Radiology today denounced new breast cancer screening guidelines by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health (CTFOPH), which recommend against annual screening of women ages 40-49 and would extend time between screens for older women.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-11-canadian-breast-cancer-screening-guidelines.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:42:48 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news241116159</guid>
	 
</item>
<item>
     <title>New breast cancer screening guidelines released</title>
   	 <description>New breast cancer screening guidelines for women at average risk of breast cancer, published in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal), recommend no routine mammography screening for women aged 40-49 and extend the screening interval from every 2 years, which is current clinical practice, to every 2 to 3 years for women aged 50-74. The guidelines also recommend against routine clinical breast exam and breast self-examination in asymptomatic women.</description>
     <link>http://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-11-breast-cancer-screening-guidelines.html</link>
	 <category>Cancer</category>
	 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:37:38 EST</pubDate>
	 <guid isPermaLink="false">news241101448</guid>
	 
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
