New research: Genes may influence popularity

December 22, 2008

A groundbreaking study of popularity by a Michigan State University scientist has found that genes elicit not only specific behaviors but also the social consequences of those behaviors.

According to the investigation by behavioral geneticist S. Alexandra Burt, male college students who had a gene associated with rule-breaking behavior were rated most popular by a group of previously unacquainted peers.

It's not unusual for adolescent rule-breakers to be well-liked – previous research has made that link – but Burt is the first to provide meaningful evidence for the role of a specific gene in this process. The study appears in the latest issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, which is published by the American Psychological Association.

"The idea is that your genes predispose you to certain behaviors and those behaviors elicit different kinds of social reactions from others," said Burt, assistant professor of psychology. "And so what's happening is, your genes are to some extent driving your social experiences."

The concept – which researchers call "evocative gene-environment correlation" – had been discussed in scientific literature but only in theory. This study is the first to really flesh out the process, establishing clear connections between a specific gene, particular behaviors and actual social situations, she said.

Burt collected DNA from more than 200 male college students in two separate samples. After interacting in a lab setting for about an hour, the students filled out a questionnaire about whom they most liked in their group. In both samples, the most popular students turned out to be the ones with a particular form of a serotonin gene that was also associated with rule-breaking behavior.

"So the gene predisposed them to rule-breaking behavior and their rule-breaking behavior made them more popular," Burt said.

Burt is working on similar studies with female college students, as well as mixed-gender social groups. She also plans to explore associations with other social behaviors and other genes in larger samples.

Source: Michigan State University

Explore further: The two obstacles that are holding back Alzheimer's research

Related Stories

The two obstacles that are holding back Alzheimer's research

November 16, 2017
Thirty years ago, scientists began to unlock the mysteries regarding the cause of Alzheimer's disease. This knowledge ushered in an era of great enthusiasm that scientists could develop new therapies to either prevent Alzheimer's ...

Loneliness could kill you

November 13, 2017
Independence is glorified in North American culture as a symbol of strength. As a society, we value individual achievement and extol self-reliance.

Breakthrough research suggests potential treatment for autism, intellectual disability

November 13, 2017
A breakthrough in finding the mechanism and a possible therapeutic fix for autism and intellectual disability has been made by a University of Nebraska Medical Center researcher and his team at the Munroe-Meyer Institute ...

How the genomics health revolution is failing ethnic minorities

November 14, 2017
Statistics Canada recently released its 2016 census data, which depicts a Canada that is more diverse than ever before. Today, nearly a quarter of Canadians belong to a "visible minority" and 1.7 million Canadians are Indigenous.

Researchers struggle to turn the tide of the opioid epidemic

November 9, 2017
The numbers tell the story of the opioid epidemic. And the story is tragic.

Twin study finds genetics affects where children look, shaping mental development

November 9, 2017
A new study co-led by Indiana University that tracked the eye movement of twins finds that genetics plays a strong role in how people attend to their environment.

Recommended for you

A walk at the mall or the park? New study shows, for moms and daughters, a walk in the park is best

November 17, 2017
Spending time together with family may help strengthen the family bond, but new research from the University of Illinois shows that specifically spending time outside in nature—even just a 20-minute walk—together can ...

Risk of distracted driving predicted by age, gender, personality and driving frequency

November 17, 2017
New research identifies age, gender, personality and how often people drive as potential risk factors for becoming distracted while driving. Young men, extroverted or neurotic people, and people who drive more often were ...

When male voles drink alcohol, but their partner doesn't, their relationship suffers

November 17, 2017
A study of the effect of alcohol on long-term relationships finds that when a male prairie vole has access to alcohol, but his female partner doesn't, the relationship suffers - similar to what has been observed in human ...

Spanking linked to increase in children's behavior problems

November 16, 2017
Children who have been spanked by their parents by age 5 show an increase in behavior problems at age 6 and age 8 relative to children who have never been spanked, according to new findings in Psychological Science, a journal ...

Generous people give in a heartbeat—new study

November 15, 2017
Altruistic people are said to be "kind hearted" - and new research published in the journal Scientific Reports shows that generous people really are more in touch with their own hearts.

Teenage depression linked to father's depression

November 15, 2017
Adolescents whose fathers have depressive symptoms are more likely to experience symptoms of depression themselves, finds a new study led by UCL researchers.

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Dunbar
1.6 / 5 (7) Dec 22, 2008
Laughable!

What idiots are resonsible for funding this sort of nonsense? The amount of variables involved in this study are astronomical - throwing a dart at a board filled with "possible outcomes" would be just as valid.

Sociobiology = any crank welcome!
ArtflDgr
1 / 5 (8) Dec 22, 2008
Dunbar seems to think that biological machines have magical ability beyond their construction. because dunbar isnt capable or man is not capable yet of understanding it fully. which means that such discoveries are going to bother dunbar alot and that the machine takes in more informaiotn and acts on it than just what he is concious of.

i can look back and i can imaging dunbar as a primitive man standing there talking all so much about how progressive he is and how fire is just a fad and will come to nothing.
DeadCorpse
1.1 / 5 (8) Dec 22, 2008
Hhmm... here I thought one of the laws of scientific discovery was that "correlation is not causation". This entire premise seems based off it.

What next? Do spoons really make people fat?
Corban
not rated yet Dec 22, 2008
Hypothetically, if the link between nature and nurture was reduced down to math, then knowing one would know the other. Nature -> Nurture, Nurture -> Nature. Of course, then we have to ask ourself: what's going to happen with that power?

Who should we encourage to have that power?
What limits should we place on that power?
Should we allow anyone to possess it?

These are common ethical equations for any breakthrough.
jaaa
not rated yet Dec 22, 2008
Oh hey 19th century genealogical predisposition, didn't know you were making a comeback.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.