Calif. produce distributor recalls potentially contaminated bunched spinach

September 20, 2009 By Claudia Melendez Salinas

The bad news: Salinas, Calif., produce distributor Ippolito International on Friday recalled two brands of bunched spinach after it tested positive for Salmonella. The good news: No one got sick.

And that's the way it should work as the world becomes more food-safety conscious, say industry experts.

"None of this is a surprise, this is how it's supposed to work, and I hope this is the way the story goes in the future," said Bob Perkins, executive director of the Monterey County Farm Bureau in California. "If we're correct in our program the way it will be is: detection, recall, nobody gets sick. It costs the producer something but we prevented (potential illnesses) and eventually this will end up being a non-story."

The voluntary call-back by Ippolito International, which has been in business for five years, comes after routine random testing of bunched spinach in Michigan by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Microbial Data Program, collected and analyzed by the Michigan Department of Agriculture, tested positive.

No illnesses have been reported to date, and the recall is limited to 1,715 cartons that have been distributed to 12 states, including California, and three provinces in Canada.

Industry experts say these types of recalls are likely to become more common with new procedures established by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and as more stringent measures are able to detect pathogens.

"It's good that there are no reports of illnesses. The company did the responsible thing and took the product off market," said Scott Horsfall, chief executive officer of the California Leafy Green Products Handler Marketing Agreement, an agribusinees association formed in the wake of the 2006 E.Coli outbreak for the industry to monitor its own practices.

Ippolito is a member of the Leafy Green agreement, which means that it follows the organization's agricultural practices designed to prevent contamination. These measures include monitoring of and soils, ensuring there is no animal invasion of flooding that could contaminate the fields, safe harvesting practices and accurate documentation for speedy tracking.

"We're in our third year, and everything we do is designed to reduce risk," Horsfall said.

But increased testing by the USDA has already resulted in false positives _ as in the July 2008 case of cilantro that originally tested positive for but turned out not to be _ and industry experts expect more recalls as continued testing prevents possible contaminated produce from reaching the market.



• "Queen Victoria" and cartons of "Tubby" bunched spinach were recalled

• There were 1,515 cartons of "Queen Victoria" brand, distributed in Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York and British Columbia, Ontario and Manitoba, Canada.

The cartons were labeled with the following Code Date Stickers which can be located on the outside edge panel of the carton.

• 10522441 5 205 (Harvested September 1, 2009)

• 10522451 5 205 (Harvested September 2, 2009)

• 10522461 5 205 (Harvested September 3, 2009)

• The 200 cartons of "Tubby" product were distributed in New York and California, and its stickers read: 10522451 5 205 (Harvested September 2, 2009)

Consumers who have purchased bunched subject to this voluntary recall are urged to dispose of the product or return it to the place of purchase for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact the company at 1-831-772-9991 between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. PDT.

For more information about Salmonella, visit: … uses/salmonella.html

(c) 2009, The Monterey County Herald (Monterey, Calif.).
Visit the Monterey County Herald's World Wide Web site at
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Dog ownership linked to lower mortality

November 17, 2017
A team of Swedish scientists have used national registries of more than 3.4 million Swedes aged 40 to 80 to study the association between dog ownership and cardiovascular health. Their study shows that dog owners had a lower ...

New shoe makes running 4 percent easier, 2-hour marathon possible, study shows

November 17, 2017
Eleven days after Boulder-born Shalane Flanagan won the New York City Marathon in new state-of-the-art racing flats known as "4%s," University of Colorado Boulder researchers have published the study that inspired the shoes' ...

Study: For older women, every movement matters

November 16, 2017
Folding your laundry or doing the dishes might not be the most enjoyable parts of your day. But simple activities like these may help prolong your life, according to the findings of a new study in older women led by the University ...

Vaping while pregnant could cause craniofacial birth defects, study shows

November 16, 2017
Using e-cigarettes during pregnancy could cause birth defects of the oral cavity and face, according to a recent Virginia Commonwealth University study.

When vegetables are closer in price to chips, people eat healthier, study finds

November 16, 2017
When healthier food, like vegetables and dairy products, is pricier compared to unhealthy items, like salty snacks and sugary sweets, Americans are significantly less likely to have a high-quality diet, a new Drexel University ...

Children's exposure to secondhand smoke may be vastly underestimated by parents

November 15, 2017
Four out of 10 children in the US are exposed to secondhand smoke, according to the American Heart Association. A new Tel Aviv University study suggests that parents who smoke mistakenly rely on their own physical senses ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Sep 21, 2009
Salmonella and/or E-coli,
Are not both these as well as ?Most? Bacteria destroyed
with cooking microwave or saucepan?
Lots of Produce (perhaps edible merchandise) is being trashed at great and continuing cost to producing: Farmers, Packing Houses, etc.!
1. Loss from initial Contamination, which many people assume and assign to any of the named Produce, whether contaminated or not.
2. Residual or memory of 'tainted produce' reduces probability of future purchases of the produce recalled!
Example: During the E-coli scare, my hosts in Canon City, CO, threw our their Spinach on the announced recall!
The next year, visiting the same hosts, the Lady asked if I would like some Spinach?
My reply: "Only if it contains 'E-coli',
"Any other Spinach, just 'lacks' that 'E-coli' Punch!

Cooking: Does it make produce, etc. safe to consume?
Multitudes of Dollars are too often at risk of loss!

Roy Stewart,
Phoenix AZ

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.