The new exercise HIT: do less

The usual excuse of "lack of time" for not doing enough exercise is blown away by new research published in The Journal of Physiology.

The study, from scientists at Canada's McMaster University, adds to the growing evidence for the benefits of short term high-intensity interval training (HIT) as a time-efficient but safe alternative to traditional types of moderate long term . Astonishingly, it is possible to get more by doing less!

"We have shown that interval training does not have to be 'all out' in order to be effective," says Professor Martin Gibala. "Doing 10 one-minute sprints on a standard stationary bike with about one minute of rest in between, three times a week, works as well in improving muscle as many hours of conventional long-term biking less strenuously."

HIT means doing a number of short bursts of intense exercise with short recovery breaks in between. The authors have already shown with young healthy college students that this produces the same physical benefits as conventional long duration endurance training despite taking much less time (and amazingly, actually doing less exercise!) However, their previous work used a relatively extreme set-up that involved "all out" pedaling on a specialized laboratory bicycle. The new study used a standard stationary bicycle and a workload which was still above most people's comfort zone —about 95% of maximal heart rate — but only about half of what can be achieved when people sprint at an all-out pace.

This less extreme HIT method may work well for people (the older, less fit, and slightly overweight among us) whose doctors might have worries about them exercising "all-out". We have known for years that repeated moderate long-term exercise tunes up fuel and to muscles and aids the removal of waste products. Exercise also improves the way muscles use the oxygen to burn the fuel in mitochondria, the microscopic power station of cells.

Running or cycling for hours a week widens the network of vessels supplying muscle cells and also boosts the numbers of mitochondria in them so that a person can carry out activities of daily living more effectively and without strain, and crucially with less risk of a heart attack, stroke or diabetes.

But the traditional approach to exercise is time consuming. Martin Gibala and his team have shown that the same results can be obtained in far less time with brief spurts of higher-intensity exercise.

To achieve the study's equivalent results by endurance training you'd need to complete over 10 hours of continuous moderate bicycling exercise over a two-week period.

The "secret" to why HIT is so effective is unclear. However, the study by Gibala and co-workers also provides insight into the molecular signals that regulate muscle adaptation to interval training. It appears that HIT stimulates many of the same cellular pathways that are responsible for the beneficial effects we associate with .

The upside of doing more exercise is well-known, but a big question for most people thinking of getting fit is: "How much time out of my busy life do I need to spend to get the perks?"

Martin Gibala says "no time to exercise" is not an excuse now that HIT can be tailored for the average adult. "While still a demanding form of training," Gibala adds, "the exercise protocol we used should be possible to do by the general public and you don't need more than an average exercise bike."

The McMaster team's future research will examine whether HIT can bring health benefits to people who are overweight or who have metabolic diseases like diabetes.

As the evidence for HIT continues to grow, a new frontier in the fitness field emerges.

Explore further

Interval training can cut exercise hours sharply

Provided by Wiley
Citation: The new exercise HIT: do less (2010, March 12) retrieved 22 September 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Mar 12, 2010
It works very well for me. Always has. Also, the way I know it, it works better for some than it does for others, based on differing body types.

Mar 12, 2010
I know I need some time just warm up or I will strain some muscles. Not sure how this fits into this study.

Mar 12, 2010
Not an expert, but by its description, HIT seems to be tailored for increasing muscle mass. That's great when part of a regimen, but from what I know, for general fitness, cardio benefits and weight loss, endurance and aerobic is the way to go. If you can't spare 30 mins a day to exercise properly, your diet and lifestyle can't be too stellar either, so you'll sooner lose muscle mass, while getting minimal benefits in other areas.

Mar 12, 2010
HIT (or HIIT as I've known it) doesn't build muscle mass the way weight training does. I think their description was poor.

I'm not an expert either, but I used to be more into it and HIIT was the way to go to get a better cardio workout in less time. It used to be that if you couldn't run 30+ minutes without panting like crazy you weren't ready for interval training because HIIT needed to be done at very high levels to really be effective. It seems the new research is just saying that you can employ the same strategy at much lower intensity levels and still get good results.

There was also a study published last year which suggested that HIIT may have significant effects on insulin levels in normally sedentary men:

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more