Psychological research conducted in WEIRD nations may not apply to global populations

June 30, 2010, University of British Columbia

A new University of British Columbia study says that an overreliance on research subjects from the U.S. and other Western nations can produce false claims about human psychology and behavior because their psychological tendencies are highly unusual compared to the global population.

According to the study, the majority of psychological research is conducted on subjects from Western nations, primarily university students. Between 2003 and 2007, 96 per cent of psychological samples came from countries with only 12 per cent of the world's populations. The U.S. alone provided nearly 70 per cent of these subjects.

However, the study finds significant psychological and behavioral differences between what the researchers call Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic (WEIRD) societies and their non-WEIRD counterparts across a spectrum of key areas, including , fairness, spatial and moral reasoning, memory and conformity.

The findings, published in Nature tomorrow and Behavioral Sciences this week, raise questions about the practice of drawing universal claims about human psychology and behavior based on research samples from WEIRD societies.

"The foundations of human psychology and behavior have been built almost exclusively on research conducted on subjects from WEIRD societies," says UBC Psychology and Economics Prof. Joe Henrich, who led the study with UBC co-authors Prof. Steven Heine and Prof. Ara Norenzayan. "While students from Western nations are a convenient, low-cost data pool, our findings suggest that they are also among the least representative populations one could find for generalizing about humans."

The study, which reviews the comparative database of research from across the behavioural sciences, finds that subjects from WEIRD societies are more individualistic, analytic, concerned with , existentially anxious and less conforming and attentive to context compared to those from non-WEIRD societies.

According to the study, significant psychological and behavioral differences also exist between population groups within WEIRD nations. For example, U.S. undergraduate students are typically more analytic and choosy and less conforming than U.S. adults without college educations.

"Researchers often implicitly assume that there is little variation across human populations or that these 'standard subjects' are as representative of the species as any other population," says Henrich. "Our study shows there is substantial variability in experimental results across populations. In fact, there is enough evidence that researchers cannot in good faith continue to make species-generalizing claims about Homo sapiens in the absence of comparative evidence."

The research team calls on universities, peer reviewers, funding agencies and journal editors to push researchers to explicitly support any generalizations to the species with evidence or potent inductive arguments. Additionally, they envision the creation of research partnerships with non-WEIRD institutions to further and expand and diversify the empirical base of the .

More information: View the study, "The weirdest people in the world?," and comprehensive commentary by the authors and colleagues in the research community at: … ueId=2-3&iid=7825832
An opinion piece by the authors will appear in the journal Nature on July 1.

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Study with infants suggests language not necessary for reasoning ability

March 16, 2018
A team of researchers from Spain, Hungary and Poland has found via a study with infants that language may not be a necessity for the ability to reason. In their paper published in the journal Science, the group describes ...

Hep C compounds alcoholism's effect on brain volume

March 16, 2018
(HealthDay)—Alcohol dependence has deleterious effects on frontal cortical volumes that are compounded by hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and drug dependence, according to a study published online March 14 in JAMA Psychiatry.

Older adults' difficulties with focusing can be used to help put a face to a name

March 16, 2018
Everyone has experienced the awkward situation of meeting someone and then forgetting their name shortly after. Among older adults, this happens more often than not.

Study casts doubt on ketamine nasal sprays for depression

March 16, 2018
Researchers from the Black Dog Institute and UNSW Sydney have questioned the efficacy and safety of intranasal ketamine for depression, with their pilot trial stopped early due to poor side effects in patients.

A little anger in negotiation pays

March 16, 2018
During negotiations, high-intensity anger elicits smaller concessions than moderate-intensity anger, according to a new study by management and business experts at Rice University and Northwestern University.

Research reveals brain mechanism involved in language learning

March 15, 2018
Learning a new language may be more of a science than an art, a University of Sussex study finds.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) Jun 30, 2010
This study... - all I can say is about time. For too long result have been published stating facts that were not in evidence.

From now on all those studies that say people will behave like X this under Y circumstances need to be linked to time and place of study and age and sex of subjects.

All results that have been generalized may be close to correct but the behavioral scientific results are a not universal results. Once the results are placed in the correct context for publication and the context must accompany the data, because once these are separated the results lose an important context binding stability.
not rated yet Jul 01, 2010
My problem with this, although I generally agree with it, is when such differences are used to aid or excuse improper behavior by any standard because "they don't know any better". Too much of that....

That little Freddie doesn't understand the idea of having a bathroom in his own apartment v.s. using a common facility in the hallway (or outside) is not an excuse for stealing a neighbor's goods....

Changing the test to better reflect repeatable and accurate results is the goal, not just skipping them entirely, or reformulating them to "help". Do you really want to be treated by a Surgeon who can't spell it?

3.7 / 5 (3) Jul 01, 2010
The make-up of the researchers themselves and their own cultural biases will have as great an impact on the results as the data set. The same can be said about other people involved in the processes of research also, for example the people who write policy, the people who decide where money is spent, and the people who control what gets published and what doesn't. There's lots of room for bias all accross the system. You see it every field, not just psychology. History is a big victim of cultural bias, for example, as well as climate change.

I'm strongly in favor of what this article suggests, but apply it to all fields of research, not just psychology.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.