New study shows science should trump politics in salt debate, editorial says

November 4, 2010, UC Davis

( -- A new study showing that sodium consumption in the United States has remained unchanged for more than 40 years provides further evidence that federal efforts to reduce salt intake are both futile and unnecessary, three health researchers argue in the November issue of the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

The authors, including David McCarron, a physician and adjunct professor in nutrition at the University of California, Davis, commented on a study published in the same issue by Adam Bernstein and Walter Willett of the Harvard .

“The Harvard paper defines a narrow range of human over nearly 50 years in the U.S.,” McCarron said. “Combined with our findings, published in 2009, these data should close the debate on whether there should be a recommended level of salt intake for the general population.

“Public policy should not try to trump human physiology,” he said. “Any attempts to do so through well-intended strategies directed at the society at large, such as mandatory sodium labeling of food products and extensive educational and social marketing efforts, are not going to change an intake pattern that reflects human biology. Such efforts also carry potentially substantial risks.”

Writing the editorial with McCarron, were Tilman Drüeke, a physician and nephrologist at France’s Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (National Institute of Health and Medical Research), and Edward Stricker, a professor and emeritus chair of neurosciences at the University of Pittsburgh.

About the Harvard study

In an effort to obtain a long-term picture of sodium intake in the U.S., the Harvard researchers analyzed data from 38 studies that were conducted between 1957 and 2003 that included more than 26,000 participants. In each study, participants’ sodium intake was monitored by recording levels of sodium in the urine -- a method considered to be the most accurate indicator of sodium consumption.

After evaluating data from all 38 studies spanning four decades, the Harvard researchers found no significant change in urinary sodium. There was no indication that sodium consumption increased over that time, and the researchers estimated that the mean sodium intake from 1957 to 2003 remained relatively constant at 3,700 milligrams per day.

Current federal dietary guidelines for salt consumption advise that adults should consume no more than 2,300 mgs (about one teaspoon) per day and individuals at risk for high blood pressure should keep their sodium intake at or below 1,500 mgs. Such levels are dramatically lower than the published data indicate are normal for healthy humans.

Salt guidelines expected to be more restrictive

Despite the recent findings on salt consumption, McCarron and colleagues note that it is anticipated that the 2010 U.S. Dietary Guidelines are expected to set the safe upper limit for all individuals, regardless of health status, at 1,500 mgs. That is less than 40 percent of the average intake.

In their editorial, McCarron, Drüeke and Stricker emphasize that public policy efforts in the U.S. during the past 30 years have had no impact on the population’s sodium intake. And sodium intake has not increased as processed foods have become saltier.

The authors also note the importance of sodium in maintaining normal cell function across virtually all organ systems and suggest that the human body has likely evolved internal “failsafe mechanisms” to insure sufficient sodium availability.

Stricker, an expert on the neuroscience of processes that balance water and sodium in the body added: “Human physiology indicates that intake should not fall below 2,300 to 2,760 mgs per day; setting a goal for the general population of a salt intake below that level makes no biological sense.”

“Bernstein and Willett's data show that government efforts in the U.S. have failed to reduce ,” Drüeke said.

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Male contraceptive compound stops sperm without affecting hormones

April 20, 2018
A new study published today in the journal PLOS ONE details how a compound called EP055 binds to sperm proteins to significantly slow the overall mobility of the sperm without affecting hormones, making EP055 a potential ...

A dose of empathy may support patients in pain

April 20, 2018
Research published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine suggests that empathic, positive messages from doctors may be of small benefit to patients suffering from pain, and improve their satisfaction about the care ...

New research suggests possible link between sudden infant death syndrome and air pollution

April 20, 2018
A study led by the University of Birmingham suggests a possible association between exposure to certain pollutants and an increased risk of so-called 'cot death'.

For heavy lifting, use exoskeletons with caution

April 20, 2018
You can wear an exoskeleton, but it won't turn you into a superhero.

Low total testosterone in men widespread, linked to chronic disease

April 19, 2018
A male's total testosterone level may be linked to more than just sexual health and muscle mass preservation, a new study finds. Low amounts of the hormone could also be associated with chronic disease, even among men 40 ...

New device to help patients with rare disease access life-saving treatment

April 19, 2018
Patients with a rare medical condition can receive life-saving treatment at the touch of a button thanks to a new device developed by scientists.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) Nov 04, 2010
Where is the logic? Government efforts have failed therefore they should cease? Salt is a micronutrient with a toxic profile beyond mircointake levels. Ironically, because it is a micronutrient, our tissues buffer salt under our skin -- something that not only saves scarce sodium ions in salt poor environments but in our salt overloaded ones stops it killing us.
not rated yet Nov 05, 2010
"federal efforts to reduce salt intake are both futile and unnecessary"
Sanity from science? There is hope.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.