Researchers capture jumping genes

February 4, 2011, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions

An ambitious hunt by Johns Hopkins scientists for actively "jumping genes" in humans has yielded compelling new evidence that the genome, anything but static, contains numerous pesky mobile elements that may help to explain why people have such a variety of physical traits and disease risks.

Using bioinformatics to compare the standard assembly of genetic elements as outlined in the reference human genome to raw whole-genome data from 310 individuals recently made available by the 1000 Genomes Project, the team revealed 1,016 new insertions of RIPs, or retrotransposon insertion polymorphisms, thereby expanding the catalog of insertions that are present in some individuals and absent in others. Their results appeared online October 27 in Genome Research.

Retrotransposons are travelling bits of DNA that replicate by copying and pasting themselves at new locations in the genome. Having duplicated themselves and accumulated over evolutionary history, transposable elements now make up about half of the . However, only a tiny subfamily of these insertions known as LINE-1 (L1) is still active in humans. Line 1 insertions are able to mobilize not only themselves but also other pieces of DNA.

"In any individual, only between 80 to 100 retrotransposons are actively copying and inserting into new sites," says Haig Kazazian, M.D., professor of , McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. "We're not only discovering where they are and who has which ones, but also finding out that they insert with a remarkable frequency: On the order of one in every 50 individuals has a brand-new insertion that wasn't in their parents."

The researchers recognized L1 retrotransposons — distinguishing them from the vast amount of fixed "fossil" transposable elements that litter the genome — because these actively are human specific and almost exactly the same in sequence from one person to another.

"Our contains around half a million interspersed L1 sequences that have accumulated over , along with over a million more repeats, most of which were mobilized by L1 elements," explains Adam D. Ewing, Ph.D., a postdoctoral fellow in Kazazian's lab. "Since the vast majority of these are ancestral and therefore common to all humans and even some of our primate relatives, we can ignore them and focus on L1s that contain human-specific characters in their sequences. Those are the actively mobilized elements responsible for considerable genomic diversity among human individuals."

The high frequency of these L1 insertions gives us a better idea about the extent of human diversity, according to Kazazian, whose 22-year focus on retrotransposons seeks to reveal how they alter the expression of human genes.

Just as the structural variants known as single nucleotide polymorphisms (or SNPs, pronounced "snips") serve as markers for various diseases, the hope is that RIPs — which are up to 6,000 times bigger than SNPs, and therefore may have a stronger effect on gene expression — will correlate with disease phenotypes.

"In that same way that someone had to go out and find the SNPs, this study was about finding RIPs that remain active and continue to produce new insertions," Kazazian says. "Now we have the background necessary to begin studies that may correlate these L1 insertions with everything from autism to cancer."

More information: Genome Research: genome.cshlp.org/

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Unprecedented study identifies 44 genetic risk factors for major depression

April 26, 2018
A global research project has mapped out the genetic basis of major depression, identifying 44 genetic variants which are risk factors for depression, 30 of which are newly discovered. The study, by the Psychiatric Genomics ...

Key differences in young, older people's immune cells attributed to environment

April 26, 2018
Discoveries by Stanford University School of Medicine investigators may help explain why older people's immune systems often don't work so well, why different people's immune systems age at different rates, and why the environment ...

New testing provides better information for parents of children with form of epilepsy

April 26, 2018
Advances in genetic testing offer new insights to parents who have a child with a rare but serious form of epilepsy, epileptic encephalopathy (EE), found in one of about every 2,000 births and characterized by developmental ...

Natural barcodes enable better cell tracking

April 24, 2018
Each of us carries in our genomes about 10 million genetic variations called single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which represent a difference of just one letter in the genetic code. Every human's pattern of SNPs is unique ...

The role of 'extra' DNA in cancer evolution and therapy resistance

April 23, 2018
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive form of brain cancer. Response to standard-of-care treatment is poor, with a two-year survival rate of only 15 percent. Research is beginning to provide a better understanding ...

Variants in non-coding DNA contribute to inherited autism risk

April 19, 2018
In recent years, researchers have firmly established that gene mutations appearing for the first time, called de novo mutations, contribute to approximately one-third of cases of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). In a new study, ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

210
2 / 5 (4) Feb 04, 2011
So, I wonder, what would the reverse do for life?
Remove all the inserted 'stuff.'
What would a human be like without the unused pieces of...hummm...where DID the other 'stuff' come from?
Did it help? If so, why did it become 'inactive' or apparently dormant?
Humans, without L1 or retrotransposons, NOW...would that be better? And humans before L1 type activity, how different could they be...from us now?
Again, imagine, a world without viruses, and infectives, probably without humans..what would RAW, sentient, life be like? hummm..
James_Mooney
not rated yet Feb 04, 2011
Why always look for diseases? Diseases are an anomaly and not the true purpose of the genome. Maybe some positive benefit is or can be conferred by reverse transposons.
Birthmark
not rated yet Feb 05, 2011
Could fractals predict specific changes in DNA or the expression of them?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.