Obesity accounts for 21 percent of medical care costs

April 5, 2012 By Susan Kelley, Cornell University

(Medical Xpress) -- Obesity now accounts for almost 21 percent of U.S. health care costs -- more than twice the previous estimates, reports a new Cornell study.

The research, which is the first to show the causal effect of obesity on , uses new methods and makes a stronger case for to prevent obesity, the authors say.

The Cornell study reports that an incurs medical costs that are $2,741 higher (in 2005 dollars) than if they were not obese. Nationwide, that translates into $190.2 billion per year, or 20.6 percent of national health expenditures. The study appeared in the January issue of the (31:1). Previous estimates had pegged the cost of obesity at $85.7 billion, or 9.1 percent of national health expenditures.

"Historically we've been underestimating the benefit of preventing and reducing obesity," said lead author John Cawley, professor of policy analysis and management in the College of and professor of economics. "Obesity raises the risk of cancer, stroke, heart attack and diabetes. For any type of surgery, there are complications with anesthesia, with healing [for the obese]. ... Obesity raises the costs of treating almost any medical condition. It adds up very quickly."

The 5 percent of Americans who are morbidly obese generate the highest costs. "These elevated costs are incurred not by the person who is 10 pounds overweight, but the person who is 100 pounds overweight," said Cawley, who is co-director of Cornell's Institute on Health Economics, and Disparities.

The study, conducted with Chad Meyerhoefer of Lehigh University, represents the final, peer-reviewed version of the researchers' 2010 working paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Cawley and Meyerhoefer used a of 24,000 non-elderly U.S. adults, their doctors and other from 2000 to 2005. The data include the individuals' weight and height and two years' worth of their medical care and its cost.

The new study estimates the effect of obesity on medical expenses by treating the heritable component of weight as a natural experiment. Previous research simply reported the difference between the medical expenses of heavier and lighter people, which is a misleading estimate of the causal effect because obese and non-obese individuals differ in so many ways. Cawley explains, "For example, I could have injured my back at work, and that may have led me to gain weight. The injury could have led to a lot of health care costs that are due to my back, not my obesity."

The research provides hard evidence for policymakers to use in cost-effectiveness analyses when deciding whether and how much to fund obesity prevention programs, Cawley said. Since previous studies have underestimated the of obesity, the economic rationale for governments to intervene to reduce obesity has been underappreciated.

The study also shows that obesity raises costs in Medicaid, suggesting that we're all paying for obesity through higher taxes, Cawley said. "That means that obesity isn't just a personal issue. This is relevant to all of society, because the health care costs of obesity are borne by the population as a whole."

Explore further: Obesity and depression independently increase health costs

Related Stories

Obesity and depression independently increase health costs

October 31, 2011
Obesity and depression both dramatically increase health care costs, but they mainly act separately, according to a study published in the November 2011 Journal of General Internal Medicine by Group Health Research Institute ...

Physician's weight may influence obesity diagnosis and care

January 26, 2012
A patient's body mass index (BMI) may not be the only factor at play when a physician diagnoses a patient as obese. According to a new study led by researchers at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, the diagnosis ...

Recommended for you

Who uses phone apps to track sleep habits? Mostly the healthy and wealthy in US

January 16, 2018
The profile of most Americans who use popular mobile phone apps that track sleep habits is that they are relatively affluent, claim to eat well, and say they are in good health, even if some of them tend to smoke.

Improvements in mortality rates are slowed by rise in obesity in the United States

January 15, 2018
With countless medical advances and efforts to curb smoking, one might expect that life expectancy in the United States would improve. Yet according to recent studies, there's been a reduction in the rate of improvement in ...

Teens likely to crave junk food after watching TV ads

January 15, 2018
Teenagers who watch more than three hours of commercial TV a day are more likely to eat hundreds of extra junk food snacks, according to a report by Cancer Research UK.

Can muesli help against arthritis?

January 15, 2018
It is well known that healthy eating increases a general sense of wellbeing. Researchers at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) have now discovered that a fibre-rich diet can have a positive influence ...

Your dishwasher is not as sterile as you think

January 13, 2018
(HealthDay)—Your dishwasher may get those plates spotless, but it is also probably teeming with bacteria and fungus, a new study suggests.

Study reveals what sleep talkers have to say

January 12, 2018
A team of researchers with members from several institutions in France has conducted a study regarding sleep talking and has found that most sleep talking is not only negative in nature, but involves a large amount of swearing. ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Apr 05, 2012
And what percentage is caused by sports injuries or related problems later in life due to bad knees, hips, shoulders, etc. that were injured in youth.
not rated yet Apr 05, 2012
Maybe we should make Obesity a crime, and pass a "Fat Tax" to supplement the public medical option.

Like make it progressive, and tax the person, or their parents, $100 per year for every point on the body mass index above the boundary of Obese, and $50 for every point in the latter half of the "over weight" category.

The exceptions to this would be a diagnosis of Cushing syndrome or some other relevant genetic disease that screws up people's metabolism.

This would stop people from being 100lbs over weight, if for no reason other than they'd have less money to buy all the damn food they consume.
1 / 5 (1) Apr 05, 2012
"That means that obesity isn't just a personal issue. This is relevant to all of society, because the health care costs of obesity are borne by the population as a whole."

Thinly veiled attempt to introduce further government interference in the lives of EVERYONE...not just the obese or overweight.
1 / 5 (1) Apr 06, 2012
I've always hated lazy fat people. Now I have a good reason.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.