Video games can teach how to shoot guns more accurately and aim for the head

April 30, 2012 by Jeff Grabmeier, The Ohio State University

Just 20 minutes of playing a violent shooting video game made players more accurate when firing a realistic gun at a mannequin – and more likely to aim for and hit the head, a new study found.

Players who used a pistol-shaped controller in a shooting video game with human targets had 99 percent more completed head shots to the mannequin than did participants who played other video games, as well as 33 percent more shots that hit other parts of the body.

In addition, the study found that participants who reported habitual playing of violent shooting games also were more accurate than others when shooting at the mannequin, and made more head shots.

It's not surprising that video games can improve shooting accuracy -- the military, police departments and others already use video games for training purposes, said Brad Bushman, co-author of the study and a professor of communication and psychology at Ohio State University.

But this is the first study to show that average players using violent shooting games with realistic human targets can improve firing aim and accuracy.

"For good and bad, video game players are learning lessons that can be applied in the real world," Bushman said.

Bushman conducted the study with Jodi Whitaker, lead author of the study and a graduate student in communication at Ohio State. The study appears online in the journal Communication Research and will be published in a future print edition.

The study involved 151 college students who first completed questionnaires measuring their aggression levels and their attitude toward guns, and asked about their firearms training, their favorite video games, and how often they played them.

They then spent 20 minutes playing one of three different video games: a violent shooting game with realistic human targets that rewarded head shots (Resident Evil 4); a nonviolent shooting game with bull's-eye targets (the target practice game in Wii Play); or a nonviolent, non-shooting game (Super Mario Galaxy).

For the two shooting games, the participants either played with a standard controller including a joystick, or used a pistol-shaped controller.

Immediately after playing the , all participants shot 16 "bullets" at a 6-foot tall, male-shaped mannequin covered in Velcro at the end of a narrow hallway, 20 feet (6.1 meters) away.

The gun – a black airsoft training pistol -- had the same weight, texture and firing recoil of a real 9mm semi-automatic pistol. The "bullets" were .43 caliber rubber training rounds covered in soft Velcro. All participants were instructed in the use of the pistol and wore safety goggles.

Participants who played the shooting game using a pistol-shaped controller completed the most head shots at the mannequin (an average of about 7). They were also the only group who completed more head shots than they did shots to other parts of the mannequin.

"We didn't tell them where to aim – we just told them to try to hit the mannequin," Bushman said.

"But the violent shooting game they played rewarded head shots, and so they shot at the mannequin like they were playing the game, aiming for the head."

Participants who played the nonviolent, non-shooting game had the fewest head shots, an average of about 2. Those who played the other games, including those who played the violent shooting game with a standard controller, fell in between those extremes.

Participants who played the violent shooting game with the pistol-shaped controller also made the most shots to other parts of the mannequin, averaging slightly more than 6.

Those who played the nonviolent, non-shooting game made an average of about 4 shots to other parts of the mannequin, the least of any group.

All of the differences among the groups regarding total hits and head shots stayed the same even after taking into account the participants' levels of aggressiveness, attitudes toward guns and firearm experience.

When the researchers examined the participants' experience playing video games, they found that those who habitually played violent shooting games had more total hits and head shots to the mannequin when compared to less experienced players.

"The more frequently one plays violent shooting games, the more accurately one fires a realistic gun and aims for the head, although we can't tell from this study which factor is the cause," Bushman said.

Bushman said these results should give parents and policymakers pause.

"We shouldn't be too quick to dismiss violent video games as just harmless fun in a fantasy world – they can have real-world effects," he said.

Some killers have credited video games for helping them prepare, he said. For example, Anders Behring Breivik, the Norwegian man who shot and killed 69 people at a youth camp in Norway last year, wrote in a manifesto: "I see MW2 (Modern Warfare 2) more as a part of my training-simulation than anything else. You can more or less completely simulate actual operations."

Bushman said he's not claiming that these games necessarily lead people to commit violent crimes.

"But this study suggests these games can teach people to shoot more accurately and aim at the head," he said.

Explore further: Kinder, gentler video games may actually be good for players

Related Stories

Kinder, gentler video games may actually be good for players

June 6, 2011
While violent video games may lead to more aggression and anger in players, a new study shows that the opposite is also true: relaxing video games can make people happier and more kind.

Violent video games reduce brain response to violence and increase aggressive behavior

May 25, 2011
Scientists have known for years that playing violent video games causes players to become more aggressive. The findings of a new University of Missouri (MU) study provide one explanation for why this occurs: the brains of ...

Playing highly competitive video games may lead to aggressive behavior

August 29, 2011
While most research into video games and aggressive behavior has focused on violent games, competitiveness may be the main video game characteristic that influences aggression, according to new research published by the American ...

Recommended for you

Intensive behavior therapy no better than conventional support in treating teenagers with antisocial behavior

January 19, 2018
Research led by UCL has found that intensive and costly multisystemic therapy is no better than conventional therapy in treating teenagers with moderate to severe antisocial behaviour.

Babies' babbling betters brains, language

January 18, 2018
Babies are adept at getting what they need - including an education. New research shows that babies organize mothers' verbal responses, which promotes more effective language instruction, and infant babbling is the key.

College branding makes beer more salient to underage students

January 18, 2018
In recent years, major beer companies have tried to capitalize on the salience of students' university affiliations, unveiling marketing campaigns and products—such as "fan cans," store displays, and billboard ads—that ...

Inherited IQ can increase in early childhood

January 18, 2018
When it comes to intelligence, environment and education matter – more than we think.

Modulating molecules: Study shows oxytocin helps the brain to modulate social signals

January 17, 2018
Between sights, sounds, smells and other senses, the brain is flooded with stimuli on a moment-to-moment basis. How can it sort through the flood of information to decide what is important and what can be relegated to the ...

Baby brains help infants figure it out before they try it out

January 17, 2018
Babies often amaze their parents when they seemingly learn new skills overnight—how to walk, for example. But their brains were probably prepping for those tasks long before their first steps occurred, according to researchers.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Apr 30, 2012
People who play first person shooters competitively and regularly learn to get in a "zone" and perform at an extreme level both in their shooting accuracy as well in their concentration and ability to dodge multiple player-character attackers.

When I was younger, I used to be very, very good at some first person shooters. It's quite typical for the best two players in a FFA game to have almost all of the kills, because everyone else in the game is just a "side note kill" that barely matters. I once beat a guy 21 kills to zero in a 1v1, 3 minute FPS game.

If you used interfaces that actually mimic real weapons, like combat simulations, I have no doubt that would easily improve your accuracy.

Although I've never been in the military, and have poor eye sight, I've qualified in the middle range of the equivalent of the Marine Corps "Sharpshooter" ranking, in all positions, which is pretty damn good for being as badly near-sighted as I am.

It works.
not rated yet Apr 30, 2012
Violent video games: teaching our children to be more efficient soldiers for future wars.
not rated yet Apr 30, 2012

to be honest, violence is all my generation has ever known, or really anyone from the 70's or 80's forward.

There's as much or more violence in an old episode of the Bugs Bunny and Tweety show as there is in any video game or R-rated movie.

I suppose humanity cannot even truly imagine a world without violence. We can try, but it beggars description. Imagine if there was no rape or murder or assault or war or terrorism.

Hell, without any need for miiltary, unemployment would be even higher, and without 2 million people in prison and a few million more police men and lawyers and such, unemployment would be like 10% higher.

Oh, that's a very, very good thing.

But just imagine how efficient civilization would be if not for evil.

Well, they'd have to remove about half of television programming, which is obsessed with rape, murder, and assault, and of course most video games and books as well, and I guess we'd all sing happy songs or something.
not rated yet May 02, 2012
One problem with extrapolating FPS ability to real world accuracy is biological factors like heart beat, breathing, and adrenaline. All three are elevated in real life compared to gaming. The first two can easily be trained to compensate for; not so much the third. Yes, I'm well aware of the adrenaline boost FPSs bring. Believe me. It's nothing like the real thing. No one can know how they will react until they are in that real situation. I've seen experience airborne infantry sergeants fall apart and literally cry the very moment bullets start flying and I've seen effeminate 130 lb weaklings just plain bring it with the passion and focus of a Navy Seal. You never know, so there are limits to training.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.