The food industry should be regulated: expert

July 3, 2012

"The obesity crisis is made worse by the way industry formulates and markets its products and so must be regulated to prevent excesses and to protect the public good," writes a leading food expert in this week's PLoS Medicine.

Kelly Brownell from the Rudd Center for and Obesity at Yale University argues that like all industries, the food industry plays by certain rules: "It must defend its core practices against all threats, produce short-term earnings, and in do doing, sell more food. If it distorts science, creates front groups to do its bidding, compromises scientists, professional organizations, and community groups with contributions, blocks needed public health policies in the service of their goals, or engages in other tactics in ''the corporate playbook,'' this is what is takes to protect business as usual."

He argues that left to regulate itself, the food industry has the opportunity, if not the mandate from shareholders, to sell more products irrespective of their impact on consumers so government, foundations, and other powerful institutions should be working for regulation, not collaboration and says: "Respectful dialogue with industry is desirable, and to the extent industry will make voluntary changes that inch us forward, the public good will be served."

However Brownell cautions: "There must be recognition that this will bring small victories only and that to take the seriously will require courage, leaders who will not back down in the face of harsh industry tactics, and regulation with purpose."

Explore further: Nutrition policy favours food industry - not public health

More information: Brownell KD (2012) Thinking Forward: The Quicksand of Appeasing the Food Industry. PLoS Med 9(7): e1001254. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001254

Related Stories

Nutrition policy favours food industry - not public health

January 10, 2012
The national nutrition policy formulated by Labour and National-led Governments favours the food industry over public health according to new research from the University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand..

Food industry needs more scrutiny from the public health community

June 19, 2012
In an editorial to launch a major new series on "Big Food," the PLoS Medicine editors and guest editors argue that the multinational food and beverage industry has a growing influence on the global health agenda and a major ...

Can nudging help fight the obesity epidemic?

April 15, 2011
With obesity rates soaring, the government has been promoting nudge – a strategy that does not tell people how to live but encourages them to make healthy choices in respect of diet and exercise.

Soda companies' PR campaigns are bad for health: experts

June 19, 2012
Health advocates need to organize strong public health campaigns to educate the public and policymakers about the dangers of both sugary beverages and the misleading industry corporate social responsibility campaigns that ...

Recommended for you

Mistletoe and (a large) wine: Seven-fold increase in wine glass size over 300 years

December 13, 2017
Our Georgian and Victorian ancestors probably celebrated Christmas with more modest wine consumption than we do today - if the size of their wine glasses are anything to go by. Researchers at the University of Cambridge have ...

Searching for a link between achy joints and rainy weather in a flood of data, researchers come up dry

December 13, 2017
Rainy weather has long been blamed for achy joints. Unjustly so, according to new research from Harvard Medical School. The analysis, published Dec. 13 in BMJ, found no relationship between rainfall and joint or back pain.

How well can digital assistants answer questions on sex?

December 13, 2017
Google laptop searches seem to be better at finding quality online sexual health advice than digital assistants on smartphones, find experts in the Christmas issue of The BMJ.

Owning a pet does not seem to influence signs of aging

December 13, 2017
Owning a pet does not appear to slow the rate of ageing, as measured by standard indicators, suggest the authors of a study published in the Christmas issue of The BMJ.

Increased air pollution linked to bad teenage behavior

December 13, 2017
A new study linking higher levels of air pollution to increased teenage delinquency is a reminder of the importance of clean air and the need for more foliage in urban spaces, a Keck School of Medicine of USC researcher said.

175 years on, study finds where you live still determines your life expectancy

December 13, 2017
Research led by the University of Liverpool has revisited a study carried out 175 years ago which compared the health and life expectancy of people in different parts of the country, including Liverpool, to see if its findings ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

alfie_null
not rated yet Jul 04, 2012
The food industry is motivated by profit. Work with that motivation. Make selling healthy food more attractive, selling junk less attractive. Maybe tax the junk, use the revenue to help pay for the damage inflicted on the rest of us.

Regulation probably would be complex and ineffective. I can imagine weighty tomes of regulations, expensive to produce, expensive to manage (lots of bureaucrats), and expensive to interpret (bias towards large companies, food monocultures). Food producers will become agile at finding/making loopholes (e.g. ketchup is a vegetable). In the end not much accomplished towards improving people's diets.
JJ1002
not rated yet Jul 04, 2012
Nice idea but it has a major draw back. when you do this it forces the producer to raise prices. This makes it harder for the economically disadvantaged to afford these foods. Ok, just give it to them. vicious cycle! Needs more work.
freethinking
not rated yet Jul 08, 2012
Regulation only benefit democrats and large industry. Why? The more regulations the harder it is on small business to produce anything. Big business can then drive small business out of business using Governement as a stick. Democrats benefit because more governement unionized employees paying dues which then goes to help elect democrats. Democrats also benefit because more people will be unemployed and dependant on government, which requires more government workers who happen to be unionized.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.