Labeling of genetically engineered foods: Proposition language raises legal issues

November 2, 2012

(Medical Xpress)—California's ballot initiative that proposes to require labeling of genetically engineered foods raises important legal and policy issues that could take years to resolve through the courts and other means, University of California, Davis, School of Law researchers caution.

"While Proposition 37 generally captures the of the genetically engineered food labeling movement, it also contains several exemptions and ambiguities that have made it a controversial measure facing California voters," says Miles Hogan, an fellow for the California Environmental Law and Policy Center at the UC Davis School of Law. "If the initiative is enacted, those important questions will have to be resolved through regulators' interpretation or in the courts."

Hogan and other researchers compiled the report, "California's Proposition 37: A Legal & Policy Analysis," examining provisions in the initiative that not only ask voters to decide whether genetically engineered foods should be labeled by retailers, but also whether to ban such foods from being called "natural."

The proposition, on the ballot in next week's general election, also proposes to exempt many foods from labeling, including processed foods, foods served at restaurants and alcohol.

While not taking a position on the initiative, the report noted that the initiative's language will likely face litigation challenges over such issues as whether Proposition 37's labeling requirements and advertising restrictions constitute a violation of the First Amendment—regulating speech both by prohibiting and by compelling certain statements by the food sellers, especially the provision that prohibits "natural" claims.

Another likely legal challenge concerns whether Proposition 37, if enacted, could be pre-empted by federal law, which does not currently require any such labeling. The federal Food and Drug Administration has been petitioned by consumer groups to issue new regulations on genetically engineered foods.

"The result of the November election and the fate of Proposition 37 at the polls will likely have a profound impact on the future of genetically engineered food labeling both in California and in the United States as a whole," the report concludes, pointing out that California has been known to pass voter initiatives that are followed by other states.

"California has been a national leader in the use of the voter initiative process to adopt a wide array of innovative laws and policies—including those to protect the environment," observed Richard Frank, director of the UC Davis School of Law's California Environmental Law and Policy Center. "How those previous initiative measures have been interpreted by the courts and enforced by California policymakers is likely to influence strongly how Proposition 37 is implemented—if the voters approve it at the polls."

No state has yet passed any broad law governing food labeling either legislatively or through a voter initiative, although 19 states have tried to pass similar laws, according to the report. Alaska enacted a law on the mandatory of fish only, for example, and Connecticut regulates what can be labeled as "organic" or "natural."

California voters in 1986 took similar steps with Proposition 65, which was an attempt to protect residents from exposure to hazardous chemicals. Formally titled the "California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act," Proposition 65 has since been amended twice by the California Legislature, even though such amendments, as in Proposition 37, require a stringent two-thirds majority of each house of the California Legislature.

Explore further: US initiative will test appetite for GMO food

Related Stories

US initiative will test appetite for GMO food

October 6, 2012
(AP)—Calories. Nutrients. Serving size. How about "produced with genetic engineering?" California voters will soon decide whether to require certain raw and processed foods to carry such a label.

California to vote on GM food labeling

October 22, 2012
California could become the first US state to enforce labeling of genetically modified (GM) foods, in a vote next month pitting agro-chemical giants against opponents of so-called "Frankenfoods."

Petition demands US label genetically engineered food

October 5, 2011
Supporters and producers of organic foods petitioned the US government Tuesday for mandatory labeling of genetically engineered foods, and encouraged consumers to go online and join the cause.

Recommended for you

Air pollution linked to poorer quality sperm

November 22, 2017
Air pollution, particularly levels of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), is associated with poorer quality sperm, suggests research published online in Occupational & Environmental Medicine.

Sunrise and sunset guide daily activities of city-dwellers

November 21, 2017
Despite artificial lightning and social conventions, the dynamics of daylight still influence the daily activities of people living in modern, urban environments, according to new research published in PLOS Computational ...

Older men need more protein to maintain muscles

November 21, 2017
The amount of protein recommended by international guidelines is not sufficient to maintain muscle size and strength in older men, according to a new study.

Exercising and eating well are greater contributors to health than standing at work

November 21, 2017
By now you've probably heard the edict from the health community: Sitting is the new smoking. Perhaps you've converted to a standing desk, or maybe you have a reminder on your phone to get up once an hour and walk around ...

Motorcycle crashes cause five times as many deaths as car accidents, six times the health costs

November 20, 2017
Motorcycle accidents are costly in terms of lives and health care costs. Compared with car accidents, motorcycle accidents cause 3 times the injuries, 6 times the medical costs and 5 times the deaths, found new research in ...

Dog ownership linked to lower mortality

November 17, 2017
A team of Swedish scientists have used national registries of more than 3.4 million Swedes aged 40 to 80 to study the association between dog ownership and cardiovascular health. Their study shows that dog owners had a lower ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.