New immune therapy treats brain tumors in mice

December 17, 2012
Engineered to specifically link with the body’s immune fighters (T-cells) on one side, and a cancer cell on the other, the bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) serves as a connector that tethers cancer to its killer. Credit: Duke Medicine

Using an artificial protein that stimulates the body's natural immune system to fight cancer, a research team at Duke Medicine has engineered a lethal weapon that kills brain tumors in mice while sparing other tissue. If it can be shown to work in humans, it would overcome a major obstacle that has hampered the effectiveness of immune-based therapies.

The protein is manufactured with two arms – one that exclusively binds to tumor cells and another that snags the body's fighter T-cells, spurring an attack on the tumor. In six out of eight mice with , the treatment resulted in cures, according to findings published Dec. 17, 2012, in the .

"This work represents a revival of a somewhat old concept that targeting cancer with tumor-specific antigens may well be the most effective way to treat cancer without toxicity," said senior author John H. Sampson, M.D., PhD, a at The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke. "But there have been problems with that approach, especially for brain tumors. Our is exciting, because it acts like Velcro to bind T-cells to and induces them to kill without any negative effects on surrounding normal tissues."

Sampson and colleagues focused on the immune approach in brain tumors, which are notoriously difficult to treat. Despite surgery, radiation and chemotherapy, are universally fatal, with a median survival of 15 months.

Immunotherapies, in which the body's B-cells and T-cells are triggered to attack tumors, have shown promise in treating brain and other cancers, but have been problematic in clinical use. Treatments have been difficult to administer at , or have spurred side effects in which the immune system also attacks healthy tissue and organs.

Working to overcome those pitfalls, the Duke-led researchers designed a kind of connector - an artificial protein called a bispecific T-cell engager, or BiTE – that tethers the tumor to its killer. Their newly engineered protein includes fractions of two separate antibodies, one that recruits and engages the body's fighter T-cells and one that expressly homes in on an antigen known as EGFRvIII, which only occurs in cancers.

Once connected via the new bispecific antibody, the T-cells recognize the tumor as an invader, and mount an attack. Normal tissue, which does not carry the tumor antigen, is left unscathed.

"One of the major advantages is that this therapy can be given intravenously, crossing the blood-brain barrier," said lead author Bryan Choi, a dual M.D-PhD candidate at Duke. "When we gave the therapy systemically to the mice, it successfully localized to the tumors, treating even bulky and invasive tumors in the central nervous system."

The team also developed an antidote to other current immune-targeting therapies that have a toxic effect, enhancing their safety profiles and bolstering their effectiveness.

"Additional studies will concentrate on whether these findings can be replicated in human trials, and whether the treatment is affected by the use of current therapies such as radiation and chemotherapy," Sampson said.

Explore further: Adoptive cell transfer: New technique could make cell-based immune therapies for cancer safer, more effective

Related Stories

Adoptive cell transfer: New technique could make cell-based immune therapies for cancer safer, more effective

December 16, 2012
A team led by Michel Sadelain, MD, PhD, Director of the Center for Cell Engineering at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, has shown for the first time the effectiveness of a new technique that could allow the development ...

Recommended for you

Accounting for human immune diversity increases clinical relevance of fundamental immunological research

July 26, 2017
Mouse models have advanced our understanding of immune function and disease in many ways but they have failed to account for the natural diversity in human immune responses. As a result, insights gained in the lab may be ...

Study sheds light on how body may detect early signs of cancer

July 26, 2017
Fresh insights into how cells detect damage to their DNA - a hallmark of cancer - could help explain how the body keeps disease in check.

How genetically engineered viruses develop into effective vaccines

July 26, 2017
Lentiviral vectors are virus particles that can be used as a vaccine to stimulate the immune system to fight against specific pathogens. The vectors are derived from HIV, rendered non-pathogenic, and then engineered to carry ...

Does your child really have a food allergy?

July 24, 2017
(HealthDay)—Many people misunderstand what food allergies are, and even doctors can be confused about how to best diagnose them, suggests a new report from the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Genetic immune deficiency could hold key to severe childhood infections

July 18, 2017
A gene mutation making young children extremely vulnerable to common viruses may represent a new type of immunodeficiency, according to a University of Queensland researcher.

What are the best ways to diagnose and manage asthma?

July 18, 2017
What are the best ways to diagnose and manage asthma in adults? This can be tricky because asthma can stem from several causes and treatment often depends on what is triggering the asthma.

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

wealthychef
5 / 5 (2) Dec 17, 2012
Wow, this sounds incredibly promising! I am not sure, but it sounds like this cured brain cancers in mice with zero side effects. Am I reading it correctly? Or does it just kill a few tumor cells?
Grallen
5 / 5 (1) Dec 18, 2012
You're reading it right. It just facilitated a normal immune response VS cancer.

The person will probably feel "sick" during the process. How sick would depend on how bad the cancer was and how fast they try to cure it.
elektron
3 / 5 (4) Dec 18, 2012
Should we really be doing research to save mice from brain tumours? I say, let them die.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.