Higher heart attack rates continue six years after Katrina

March 7, 2013

New Orleans residents continue to face a three-fold increased risk of heart attack post-Katrina—a trend that has remained unchanged since the storm hit in 2005, according to research being presented at the American College of Cardiology's 62nd Annual Scientific Session.

The new data—an update to previous analyses comparing the behavioral and heart health of people before and after the storm—show this heightened risk persists even though post-Katrina patients are more likely to be prescribed medications known to prevent heart attacks such as aspirin, , statins and . Compared to the pre-Katrina group, those experiencing a after the storm were less likely to comply with these therapies or have health insurance. They were also more likely to smoke, overuse alcohol or other substances, and be burdened with high and mental illness.

"Overwhelmingly, the main differences in the pre- and post-Katrina populations involve psychosocial risk factors as opposed to shifts in traditional like hypertension, obesity and diabetes," said Anand Irimpen, MD, the study's senior investigator, associate professor of medicine at the Heart and Vascular Institute of Tulane University School of Medicine and chief of cardiology at the Southeast Louisiana Veterans . "These findings have broad implications about how affect communities, as well as the extensive costs to society, whether it is financial or social."

Dr. Irimpen said the evidence supports an association between pervasive levels of and heart health and underscores the need for clinicians to proactively assess their patients' , especially in the aftermath of such a traumatic event. Previous studies indicate and , in particular, may reduce the occurrence of heart attacks.

This study evaluated patients admitted with heart attacks to Tulane Medical Center in the two years before Katrina and the six years after the hospital reopened, which was five months after Katrina. Researchers examined differences in the incidence of heart attacks and compared the two groups based on specific demographic and clinical data, including lab test results, health insurance status, first-time hospitalization, medical non-adherence, smoking status, substance abuse and employment. In the post-Katrina group, there were 1,177 confirmed admissions for heart attack representing 2.4 percent of the total patient census of 48,258 compared to 150 admissions representing 0.7 percent of the patient census of 21,079 in the two-year pre-Katrina group (p<0.0001).

The groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, ethnicity and hypertension. However, the post-Katrina group had a higher prevalence of prior coronary artery bypass grafts, hyperlipidemia, psychiatric comorbidities like depression and anxiety disorder, as well as smoking and substance abuse. This group was also more likely to be unemployed, uninsured and reside in New Orleans. While there seems to be a higher proportion of people with coronary artery disease post-Katrina, Dr. Irimpen says this increase may be secondary to the surge in heart attacks. The prevalence of known coronary artery disease among these patients was 42, 48 and 53 percent at two, four and six years after the storm, respectively. It was 30.7 percent pre-Katrina, suggesting that people may not be adequately controlling cardiovascular risk factors.

"Large-scale catastrophes like Hurricane Katrina seem to create a very large shift in the population and the way it behaves and takes care of itself," he said. "While there is a lot we can do with medications and medical interventions, those therapies become less effective based on the way the patient takes care of him or herself."

This stark reality has prompted these researchers to recommend that officials in New Orleans and other areas hard-hit by natural disasters, such as hurricanes, tornados, earthquakes or tsunamis, identify and integrate strategies that consider psychological and cardiovascular health into disaster planning. As much as the Gulf Coast has been rebuilt in the last six years, there are still lingering signs of destruction, which have an ongoing effect on heart health.

"The massive devastation of Hurricane Katrina has broken the infrastructure of New Orleans, and its effects are much more far-reaching than we expected," Dr. Irimpen said, adding that ongoing implementation of lifestyle changes to help accommodate for unforeseen circumstances is imperative for maintaining heart health.

As more data is amassed, he and his research team plan to collaborate with other centers to collect and compare data from sites around the U.S. that have experienced major natural disasters, including those in the New York area following Hurricane Sandy. The hope is that this research will eventually allow the team to create a risk prediction tool that may lead to better triage of patients who are susceptible to post-disaster attacks.

Explore further: Heart ultrasound helps determine risk of heart attack, death in HIV patients

More information: Matthew Peters, MD, a second year internal medicine resident at Tulane University School of Medicine, will present the study "Increased Incidence of Acute Coronary Syndrome Following Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans: The Impact Continues" on Saturday, March 9, at 9:15 a.m. in Moscone Center, West, Room 3020.

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Macrophages shown to be essential to a healthy heart rhythm

April 20, 2017

A Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH)-led research team has identified a surprising new role for macrophages, the white blood cells primarily known for removing pathogens, cellular debris and other unwanted materials. In ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Mar 07, 2013
Looks like nihilism.

People see, perhaps for the first time, that they can be killed by nature for any random reason, or no reason, or else lose family or all property, etc, so the "why bother" mentality probably sets in.

Trust me, I know the whole "why bother" feeling.

You're going to die anyway. So is gaining an extra six montsh or a year or two (probably spent in a nursing home where you might be drowned in the next storm anyway,) is that really worth nit-picking your health every waking moment of your life?

Then they have to deal with bozos like Mitt Romney denigrating the poor and the unfortunate, claiming that everyone on "entitlement programs" wants to be there; stupid SOB could do with a few catastrophes of his own to teach him about real world problems.

Anyway, if you're wealthy and lucky, life is a beach.

If you're unlucky, life's a bitch, no matter how hard or smart you work, it'll keep kicking you in the face. Eventually you just get tired of bothering with it all.
not rated yet Mar 07, 2013
It would be a great idea to have a constitutional amendment so that no person could hold an elected office unless they had suffered a house fire or storm damage resulting in a total loss. In addition, they cannot have inherited more money or property in their life time than the median value of a new home at the time they would take office.

This would exclude the insanely wealthy who have lived on everyone else's back for generations from being in public office, and instead would have REAL CITIZENS in office.

Such people actually know, hopefully, the hardships that real families face in their lifetime, and could be better trusted to make policies to protect and aid real people.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.