Medical myth: Sex induces labour

March 7, 2013 by Monique Robinson, The Conversation
There has been very little scientific evidence so far to support sex as a method of inducing labour. Credit:

Sex. It's what got you into pregnancy, but is it also the pathway to getting you out?

Around a quarter of all Australian pregnancies are medically induced, with a third of those inductions occurring due to continuing beyond term (40 weeks). Induction is not without its risks and discomfort and it is understandable that women may look to some alternate method of inducing labour.

One American study reported that half of women who reach their due dates attempt to initiate labour through a variety of non-medical techniques. There is a proliferation of DIY methods to induce labour that can be found online, and one of the most common recommendations is to have . But does sex initiate labour?

There are biologically plausible reasons why at term may help to speed the arrival of a baby. First, semen is a of prostaglandins, which are used in synthetic form to encourage cervical ripening in preparation for labour. Second, sex plus or minus orgasm has been found to increase uterine activity, and nipple stimulation is also thought to stimulate the uterus to induce labour.

But despite the biological plausibility and popularity in the community, there has been very little scientific evidence so far to support sex as a method of inducing labour.

One study found that at term was associated with earlier onset of labour. However, when the researchers repeated this study, they found the reverse: women who reported having sex at term were actually less likely to go into spontaneous labour than women who abstained.

A US study confirmed these results and also found no significant cervical changes for women who were sexually active at term compared with those who were not, disputing the cervical ripening hypothesis.

So if there is no scientific evidence to support this method of labour induction, why are more than three quarters of aware of this myth and why do almost half of all women believe it?

Well, the thing about being 40 weeks' pregnant, is that sex or no sex, you are likely to go into spontaneous labour at any moment. So it's very easy to mistakenly identify sex as the cause when, in fact, it may be completely irrelevant. Psychological research has shown that once something has happened to us, we are more likely to believe that it is universally true, hence the proliferation of testimonials for this being the cause of labour.

It's also a difficult thing to assess, as sexual activity is hard to uniformly define. Breast stimulation, for example, may or may not be part of sexual activity, and the role of from will depend on condom use, volume of ejaculate, and concentration of prostaglandin within the ejaculate.

There are reasons why some women may avoid sex at term, not the least of which is the necessary gymnastic skill. who are experiencing abdominal discomfort, mild contractions, or pelvic pressure may be less likely to extend a "come hither" look to their partner, and these symptoms may also indicate labour is imminent. Hence the findings that those who abstain from sex at term are more likely to go into spontaneous labour.

In terms of other labour induction myths, there is also no evidence to suggest that eating spicy food at term can speed the arrival of your baby.

The same goes for castor oil, which is more likely to have you running for the toilet than the delivery suite.

Reportedly, some Native American tribes traditionally believe that a fright can induce labour, and other cultures believe that starving the mother in the last week of pregnancy will encourage the baby to emerge in search of a feed. Aside from the lack of scientific evidence, frightening or starving the baby out really doesn't seem like the kindest way to welcome your bundle of joy to the world.

So it would appear that, in the tradition of the online Chinese baby gender predictor that is right 50% of the time, having sex at term may indeed induce labour, or equally likely, it may not.

Toey even though you can't see your toes? Unless you have a high-risk pregnancy and have been advised to abstain, there is no harm done from sex, curry or both.

Explore further: Inducing labor can reduce birth complications without increasing Cesareans

Related Stories

Inducing labor can reduce birth complications without increasing Cesareans

May 10, 2012
Induction of labour beyond 37 weeks of pregnancy can reduce perinatal mortality (death before, during or shortly after birth) without increasing caesarean section rates, finds a study published on BMJ today.

Balancing the womb

December 21, 2011
(Medical Xpress) -- New research hopes to explain premature births and failed inductions of labour.

Uterine rupture is rare in the UK but increases with the number of previous cesarean deliveries

March 13, 2012
An analysis of the UK Obstetric Surveillance System published in this week's PLoS Medicine shows that uterine rupture—a serious complication of pregnancy in which the wall of the uterus (womb) tears during pregnancy ...

Mums-to-be missing out on benefits of water immersion

May 24, 2012
Queensland mums-to-be are being denied access to water immersion during labour even though research shows it shortens labour and reduces interventions.

Women with a fear of childbirth endure a longer labor: research

June 26, 2012
Women who have a fear of childbirth spend longer in labour than women who have no such fear, suggests new research published today (27 June) in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

Recommended for you

Who uses phone apps to track sleep habits? Mostly the healthy and wealthy in US

January 16, 2018
The profile of most Americans who use popular mobile phone apps that track sleep habits is that they are relatively affluent, claim to eat well, and say they are in good health, even if some of them tend to smoke.

Improvements in mortality rates are slowed by rise in obesity in the United States

January 15, 2018
With countless medical advances and efforts to curb smoking, one might expect that life expectancy in the United States would improve. Yet according to recent studies, there's been a reduction in the rate of improvement in ...

Teens likely to crave junk food after watching TV ads

January 15, 2018
Teenagers who watch more than three hours of commercial TV a day are more likely to eat hundreds of extra junk food snacks, according to a report by Cancer Research UK.

Can muesli help against arthritis?

January 15, 2018
It is well known that healthy eating increases a general sense of wellbeing. Researchers at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) have now discovered that a fibre-rich diet can have a positive influence ...

Your dishwasher is not as sterile as you think

January 13, 2018
(HealthDay)—Your dishwasher may get those plates spotless, but it is also probably teeming with bacteria and fungus, a new study suggests.

Study reveals what sleep talkers have to say

January 12, 2018
A team of researchers with members from several institutions in France has conducted a study regarding sleep talking and has found that most sleep talking is not only negative in nature, but involves a large amount of swearing. ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Mar 07, 2013
I have never heard of this myth...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.