US court rules to protect generic drug makers

Manufacturers of generic drugs cannot be sued for adverse side effects caused by products that they did not themselves design, the US Supreme Court ruled on Monday.

In a five-to-four decision, the justices found in favor of Mutual Pharmaceutical, overturning a $21 million award against it after a woman suffered horrific burns after taking an anti-inflammatory in 2004.

are copies of drugs already developed by other firms and approved by , and Mutual argued that any faults in the product are thus not its responsibility.

In his written opinion, conservative Justice Samuel Alito said the court had reached its finding "reluctantly", noting the "tragic" circumstances of the case which had left the victim "severely disfigured" and "nearly blind."

But he ruled it was impossible for manufacturers "to comply with both state and federal law, New Hampshire's warning-based design-defect cause of action is pre-empted with respect to FDA-approved drugs sold in interstate commerce."

" are also prohibited from making any unilateral changes to a drug label," it added.

In the case before the court, plaintiff Karen Bartlett suffered and pain and several months in a coma after using an anti-inflammatory to treat a sore shoulder.


Explore further

Court: Can generic drug maker be sued over design?

© 2013 AFP

Citation: US court rules to protect generic drug makers (2013, June 24) retrieved 27 May 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-06-court-drug-makers.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more