Scientists explain why having more money doesn't make us happier

October 16, 2013
“Findings show that we have been over-estimating the positive wellbeing effects of income increases. Income losses have a much greater influence on wellbeing than equivalent income gains,” says Dr Christopher Boyce of the University of Stirling.

(Medical Xpress)—Living standards have risen significantly in the developed world over the past 50 years, so why aren't we happier than our grandparents?

A new University of Stirling study, which uses survey data from about 50 000 people in the UK and Germany, has the answer: the psychological benefits from income rises are wiped out by much smaller income losses.

The research, led by Dr Christopher Boyce of the Behavioural Science Centre at Stirling Management School, has significant implications for policymakers under pressure to establish economies that help maintain higher well-being.

Findings suggest that fiscal and monetary policy that focuses on economic stability, rather than high growth at the risk of instability, is more likely to enhance national happiness and wellbeing levels.

A strategy that runs the risk of small, temporary cuts to our spending, on the other hand, will probably lead to wider spread dissatisfaction than previously believed.

This is because people experience the pain of losing money more intensely than the joys of earning more.

The "Money, Well-being and Loss Aversion" research project based its conclusions on data gathered on about 20 000 people in the UK and 30 000 in Germany for up to nine years.

The study may help explain why bonus structures and remuneration schemes that are based on commissions can easily backfire, with staff morale taking a larger dip than expected in leaner times when there are lower – or no – bonuses.

The research also helps explain why there is risk aversion among investors: temporary falls in income have a much larger impact on our feeling of contentment than income gains of the same magnitude.

"Findings show that we have been over-estimating the positive wellbeing effects of income increases. Income losses have a much greater influence on wellbeing than equivalent income gains," says Dr Boyce.

"Over the past 50 years we have experienced long-term , but there has not been accompanying increases in our long-term wellbeing. We undertook this study to help understand why our happiness levels have not improved with rises in income," says the behavioural scientist.

Previous studies on money and wellbeing have examined income changes, but have not differentiated between the income changes that arose from losses, as opposed to gains.

"Both individuals and societal well-being may be best served by small and stable income increases even if such stability impairs long-term growth," says Dr Boyce.

"Findings suggest that when we are thinking about trying to increase individuals' and societies' well-being it would be preferable to focus on as opposed to higher economic growth that risks greater volatility," he adds.

The research is published in the latest edition of leading academic journal Psychological Science and is available online from today.

Scientists analysed data gathered in the German Socio-Economic Panel Study from 2001 to 2009 and British Household Panel Study between 1998 and 2007.

Explore further: Increases in personal income important for happiness worldwide, new study says

More information: pss.sagepub.com/content/early/ … 97613496436.abstract

Related Stories

Increases in personal income important for happiness worldwide, new study says

December 3, 2012
For people living in both rich and poor countries, the average person's happiness is based on a combination of individual wealth, possessions and optimism, according to an analysis of new worldwide survey findings published ...

Does migraine affect income or income affect migraine?

August 28, 2013
Studies show that migraine is more common among people with lower incomes. This relationship is examined in a study published in the August 28, 2013, online issue of Neurology, the medical journal of the American Academy ...

Recommended for you

In making decisions, are you an ant or a grasshopper?

July 20, 2017
In one of Aesop's famous fables, we are introduced to the grasshopper and the ant, whose decisions about how to spend their time affect their lives and future. The jovial grasshopper has a blast all summer singing and playing, ...

Perceiving oneself as less physically active than peers is linked to a shorter lifespan

July 20, 2017
Would you say that you are physically more active, less active, or about equally active as other people your age?

Study examines effects of stopping psychiatric medication

July 20, 2017
Despite numerous obstacles and severe withdrawal effects, long-term users of psychiatric drugs can stop taking them if they choose, and mental health care professionals could be more helpful to such individuals, according ...

New study suggests that reduced insurance coverage for mental health treatment increases costs for the seriously ill

July 19, 2017
Higher out-of-pocket costs for mental health care could have the unintended consequence of increasing the use of acute and involuntary mental health care among those suffering from the most debilitating disorders, a Harvard ...

Old antibiotic could form new depression treatment

July 19, 2017
An antibiotic used mostly to treat acne has been found to improve the quality of life for people with major depression, in a world-first clinical trial conducted at Deakin University.

Wonder why those happy memories fade? You're programmed that way

July 19, 2017
We'll always have Paris." Or will we?

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.