Seven+ daily portions of fruit and veg linked to lowest risk of death from all causes

March 31, 2014
This table summarizes the main effects of fruit and vegetable consumption on risk of death, expressed as percentage decreases. Credit: UCL

Eating at least seven daily portions of fruit and vegetables may confer the best chance of staving off death from any cause, indicates research published online in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

And may pack more of a protective punch than fruit, the data suggest.

The UK government currently recommends eating five daily portions of , prompting the suggestion in an accompanying editorial that it may be time to review national dietary recommendations.

A diet rich in fruit and vegetables has been linked to , but many of the studies on which this association is based have largely been carried out on people who are already likely to be health conscious.

And while plenty of fruit and vegetables in the diet are recommended to boost , the evidence for its impact on warding off cancer has been less clear-cut.

The authors therefore analysed lifestyle data for more than 65,000 randomly selected adults aged at least 35, derived from annual national health surveys for England between 2001and 2008. And they tracked recorded deaths from among the sample for an average of 7.5 years.

On average, the survey respondents said they had eaten just under four portions of fruit and vegetables the previous day. During the monitoring period 4399 people died (6.7% of the sample).

The analysis revealed that eating fruit and vegetables was associated with a lower risk of death, overall, and deaths from heart disease/stroke and cancer. The higher the intake of fruit and vegetables, the greater the protective effects seemed to be.

Eating at least seven daily portions was linked to a 42% lower risk of death from all causes and from cancer and heart disease/stroke of 25% and 31%, respectively, after excluding deaths within the first year of the monitoring period.

Vegetables may be more protective, the figures suggest: 2-3 daily portions were linked to a 19% lower risk of death, compared with a 10% lower risk for the equivalent amount of fruit. And each portion of salad or vegetables seemed to confer a 12-15% lower risk of death.

But while fresh and dried fruit seemed to strongly curb the risk of death, a portion of frozen/tinned fruit seemed to increase it by 17%, which public health doctors from the University of Liverpool describe in an accompanying editorial as "intriguing."

Might added sugars in 'processed' fruit products explain this finding, they wonder.

They conclude that current dietary guidance, which includes consumption of dried or tinned fruit, smoothies, and as legitimate ways of reaching the '5-a-day' goal, might need to be revised.

"150 ml of freshly squeezed orange juice (sugar 13 g); 30 g of dried figs (sugar 14 g); 200 ml of a smoothie made with fruit and fruit juice (sugar 23 g) and 80 g of tinned fruit salad in juice (sugar 10 g)...contain a total of some 60 g of refined sugar," they point out. "This is more than the sugar in a 500 ml bottle of cola."

As only one in four adults in England gets their recommended '5 a day' the benefits of getting everyone else to up their game are "huge," they suggest.

But the study findings imply that even those who do get their recommended quota, need to eat more, they say. "Is it perhaps now time for the UK to update the '5 a day' message to '10 a day'? they ask.

Explore further: Eating organic food doesn't lower your overall risk of cancer, study says

More information: Fruit and vegetable consumption and all-cause, cancer and CVD mortality: analysis of Health Survey for England data, Online First, DOI: 10.1136/jech-2013-203500

Fruit and vegetable consumption and non-communicable disease: time to update the '5 a day' message? Online First, DOI: 10.1136/jech-2014-203981

Related Stories

Fruit juice – just another sugary drink?

February 11, 2014

(Medical Xpress)—Drinking fruit juice is potentially just as bad for you as drinking sugar-sweetened drinks because of its high sugar content, two medical researchers from the University of Glasgow have warned.

Recommended for you

Exercise and vitamin D better together for heart health

April 27, 2017

Johns Hopkins researchers report that an analysis of survey responses and health records of more than 10,000 American adults for nearly 20 years suggests a "synergistic" link between exercise and good vitamin D levels in ...

'Diet' products can make you fat, study shows

April 25, 2017

High-fat foods are often the primary target when fighting obesity, but sugar-laden "diet" foods could be contributing to unwanted weight gain as well, according to a new study from the University of Georgia.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2 / 5 (1) Apr 01, 2014
The "risk of death from all causes" is exactly unity, since there have been no immortal human beings identified.
When used in reporting results of statistical analyses, this phrase should *always* be coupled with a time qualifier.
1 / 5 (1) Apr 02, 2014
The "risk of death from all causes" is exactly unity, since there have been no immortal human beings identified.

Excuse me taddy, but, does coming BACK from the grave count? Jus sorta askin' to get clarification and such - is all...thanks. Its jus a question (The chart does NOT list murder, lynching, stabbings, poisoned, hate crimes, car wrecks, war, get-nuked, nailed to a cross, married tadchem :-) etc, etc, all pretty common causes of death throughout most of human history and such) your tadpoleness. Later

not rated yet Apr 06, 2014
Seven plus portions of fruit and vegetables per day would seem to leave little room for anything else. What are these high level consumers not eating?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.