Importance of patient reported outcomes in cardiovascular clinical trials

June 5, 2014

Patient reported outcomes (PROs) should be comprehensively included in cardiovascular clinical trials using the best available tools, according to leading cardiologists and industry representatives in the Cardiovascular Round Table (CRT). All ESC guideline committees will now systematically consider PROs when making recommendations.

The CRT is an independent forum established by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and comprised of cardiologists and representatives of the pharmaceutical, device and equipment industries. The group's views are published today in European Heart Journal.

Professor Stefan D. Anker, lead author, said: "PROs inform about important (non-survival) aspects of life that are important to patients. They are needed for health technology assessments and reimbursement decisions. But until now PROs have not been routinely evaluated in cardiovascular ."

He added: "Our paper outlines the value of including PROs in clinical trials and how to make their assessment scientifically rigorous. The ESC Board has now committed to ensuring that PROs are considered by all ESC guideline task forces."

PROs include symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and adherence to therapy. PRO data can be used to inform routine clinical care, particularly when weighing up the risks and benefits of alternative therapies; support a label claim that a therapy improves symptoms, functional ability or HRQoL; and to support reimbursement decisions, which may consider the effect of a therapy on well-being, functional status or productivity, in addition to the primary clinical endpoint.

The authors argue that "integrating PRO data into comprehensive efficacy evaluations will ultimately improve the quality of care for patients across the spectrum of ". PRO measures should be assessed in "at least a subset of patients enrolled in cardiovascular mega-trials", they state.

Trialists who use PROs must ensure that they apply the same scientific rigour as they do with other endpoints. The PRO hypothesis should be stated in the protocol, along with a clear statement of the key PRO that will be analysed. PRO data should be recorded by the patient whenever possible. Statistical power should be allocated to the PRO endpoint if it is a primary, co-primary, or key secondary endpoint.

Professor Anker said: "PROs are subject to patient and physician bias and therefore designing studies so that they are bias free is important. Double-blind studies are the key to achieving this."

Study procedures should be in place to minimise missing data and reasons for missing data should be captured. As the authors point out, "a treatment that prolongs life may perform worse on PRO outcomes than a treatment without a survival benefit because the patients survive to report PROs but still experience disease progression that results in recurrent events or multiple hospitalisations".

Interpretation of PRO data in cardiovascular clinical trials remains challenging because there is no consensus in many cases on what constitutes a clinically meaningful change. "Further research efforts are needed to resolve this major issue," state the authors. They add: "Until a common approach to such analyses has been adopted, we suggest that the analysis plan for PROs should be discussed with regulatory agencies and with stakeholders (patients, PRO experts) early in the trial planning process."

The paper outlines actions the ESC will take to increase the prominence of PROs in cardiovascular research and the translation of findings to clinical practice. Some of these are: establishing PROs as a factor to be considered by all ESC guideline task forces; including well-designed studies with PRO assessments in prominent sessions of international congresses; encouraging the incorporation of appropriate PRO measures in all pivotal cardiovascular trials and registries; increasing funding opportunities for PRO methodologic research; and emphasising the publication of research on PRO instruments and PRO endpoints.

Professor Anker concluded: "The valid assessment of PROs in cardiovascular clinical trials should become usual practice and we look forward to the inclusion of PRO data in all ESC guideline discussions. These changes will undoubtedly help to improve the quality of care for patients with cardiovascular disease."

Explore further: New guidance urges improved reporting of important outcomes for patients in trials publications

More information: Anker SD, Agewall S, Borggrefe M, Calvert M, Caro JJ, Cowie MR, Ford I, Paty JA, Riley JP, Swedberg K, Tavazzi L, Wiklund I, Kirchhof P. The importance of patient reported outcomes: a call for their comprehensive integration in cardiovascular clinical trials. European Heart Journal. 2014; DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu

Related Stories

New guidance urges improved reporting of important outcomes for patients in trials publications

February 28, 2013
Clinical trials provide us with the best evidence to guide patient treatment and inform health policy. Yet, crucial information, on outcomes reported directly by patients such as their quality of life, is often left out of ...

Heart risks of glucose-lowering drugs being overlooked in clinical trials

March 12, 2014
Why is heart failure not more rigorously assessed in clinical trials of antidiabetes drugs? In a Personal View, published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology journal, Professor John McMurray of The University of Glasgow ...

Palliation is rarely a topic in studies on advanced cancer

April 24, 2014
End-of-life aspects, the corresponding terminology, and the relevance of palliation in advanced cancer are often not considered in publications on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This is the result of an analysis by ...

Urgent call for cardiovascular R&D revival to halt growing CVD epidemic

July 9, 2013
A resurgence in cardiovascular R&D is urgently needed to curb a new epidemic of cardiovascular diseases, according to leading cardiologists and industry representatives in the Cardiovascular Round Table (CRT).

Study shows value of HRQOL assessment in small cell lung cancer

January 28, 2014
An EORTC study published in Lancet Oncology found that health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessment in small-cell lung cancer randomized clinical trials provides relevant added information in studies where the treatment ...

Recommended for you

How genes and environment interact to raise risk of congenital heart defects

October 19, 2017
Infants of mothers with diabetes have a three- to five-fold increased risk of congenital heart defects. Such developmental defects are likely caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. However, the molecular ...

Mouse studies shed light on how protein controls heart failure

October 18, 2017
A new study on two specially bred strains of mice has illuminated how abnormal addition of the chemical phosphate to a specific heart muscle protein may sabotage the way the protein behaves in a cell, and may damage the way ...

Newborns with trisomy 13 or 18 benefit from heart surgery, study finds

October 18, 2017
Heart surgery significantly decreases in-hospital mortality among infants with either of two genetic disorders that cause severe physical and intellectual disabilities, according to a new study by a researcher at the Stanford ...

Saving hearts after heart attacks: Overexpression of a gene enhances repair of dead muscle

October 17, 2017
University of Alabama at Birmingham biomedical engineers report a significant advance in efforts to repair a damaged heart after a heart attack, using grafted heart-muscle cells to create a repair patch. The key was overexpressing ...

Physically active white men at high risk for plaque buildup in arteries

October 17, 2017
White men who exercise at high levels are 86 percent more likely than people who exercise at low levels to experience a buildup of plaque in the heart arteries by middle age, a new study suggests.

High blood pressure linked to common heart valve disorder

October 17, 2017
For the first time, a strong link has been established between high blood pressure and the most common heart valve disorder in high-income countries, by new research from The George Institute for Global Health at the University ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.