Why do resistant bacteria succeed?

Why do resistant bacteria succeed?
A summary of the source and geographic spread of six different lineages of S. enterica serovar Paratyphi A, including the dates when transmission occurred. Lineage sources, labelled A-F, are circled. Credit: DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1411012111
(Medical Xpress)—In two new studies, scientists use genome sequencing of worldwide samples to show that bacteria can take very different routes to becoming a successful disease. Researchers can use these large-scale approaches to track pathogen transmission patterns across the globe and therefore possibly to predict the emergence and spread of a new disease.

In one study of Streptococcus agalactiae, a cause of serious neonatal septicaemia and shock in new born babies, the team reported that the emergence of the was due in part to the acquisition of genes encoding resistance to the . Contrastingly, a separate study of the bacteria Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A found that it was most likely environmental changes that were possibly associated with urbanisation that led to epidemics of typhoid fever in human populations over the 450-year history of the disease.

"We have developed systems for characterising the population structure of pathogens, and used these systems in two instances to yield different findings," says Professor Gordon Dougan, author from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute. "We were able to define the timeframe of the origin of two completely different infectious diseases, and in future we will be able to use this approach to identify and control emerging threats."

The first study revealed that S. agalactiae, or Group B Streptococcus (GBS), emerged as a disease in the 1960s not just because of previous under diagnosis, as originally thought, but as a result of the widespread use of , which was introduced in 1948. The overuse of this broad-spectrum antibiotic resulted in an evolutionary bottleneck, where the GBS populations gained , converting them from a harmless organism to a pathogen and enabling them to occupy a new niche in mothers and babies.

Tetracycline can also reduce the thousands of species of helpful microorganism living in the mother and child, collectively known as the microbiome, which might help control GBS disease. This research provides further insight into how a new infectious disease emerges, and it can be used to determine how a future threat could be prevented.

"This is possibly the earliest case of the emergence of a new disease that can be directly associated with antibiotic use," says Professor Gordon Dougan. "GBS causes a distressing infection of sepsis and meningitis seen in new born children that can result in severe illness and death, making it one of the most serious diseases in babies."

This study also highlights the need for targeted drugs to fight strains such as CC17, a particularly virulent strain of GBS responsible for the majority of meningitis cases in new born children. The data reveals that CC17 capitalised on becoming resistant to tetracycline and then other antibiotics, expanding rapidly in numbers and contributing to the increase of neonatal infections.

"The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics has led to the emergence of GBS disease," says Dr Mark Davies, co-first author and NHMRC Training Fellow at both the Sanger Institute and the University of Queensland, Australia. "By combining surveillance with the use of specific targeted antimicrobials, we can reduce the risk of a new disease emerging in the future whilst maintaining the normal protective microbial flora within us."

Using whole in a separate study of S. enterica serovar Paratyphi A, which causes , researchers discovered the disease emerged in humans about 450 years ago, and has remained genetically similar since then. Researchers revealed that Paratyphi A has undergone a gradual accumulation of mutations over time known as genetic drift, which has resulted in little change during its life as a pathogen. However, signatures of antibiotic resistance are now also emerging but they appear not to be stable at the moment.

This study is particularly timely because vaccines for Paratyphi A are currently being tested, and it is hoped that trials will start within two to three years. The research will help scientists to understand how the pathogen is moving between individuals and between populations, as well as how it is changing genetically over time. This will enable scientist to risk assess each vaccine trial site individually, and apply a tailored intervention programme that will be likely to have the most impact in that particular location.

The study also suggests that the disease may have moved from an animal source when humans started living in denser urban environments in close proximity to livestock. Similar to the history of whooping cough and tuberculosis, the pathogen then became fixed in humans and spread around the globe. Like the GBS study, this new research also suggests that Paratyphi A has begun to change genetically in recent decades through the use of antibiotics.

Explore further

Careless use of drugs bred baby-threatening germ, scientists report

More information: Transient Darwinian selection in Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A during 450 years of global spread of enteric fever. Zhou Z, McCann A, Weill FX, Blin C, Nair S, Wain J, Dougan G and Achtman M, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2014. PUBMED: 25092320; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1411012111

Streptococcus agalactiae clones infecting humans were selected and fixed through the extensive use of tetracycline. Da Cunha V, Davies MR, Douarre PE, Rosinski-Chupin I, Margarit I, Spinali S, Perkins T, Lechat P, Dmytruk N, Sauvage E, Ma L, Romi B, Tichit M, Lopez-Sanchez MJ, Descorps-Declere S, Souche E, Buchrieser C, Trieu-Cuot P, Moszer I, Clermont D, Maione D, Bouchier C, McMillan DJ, Parkhill J, Telford JL, Dougan G, Walker MJ, DEVANI Consortium, Holden MT, Poyart C, Glaser P and DEVANI Consortium, Nature communications 2014;5;4544. PUBMED: 25088811; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5544

Provided by Wellcome Trust
Citation: Why do resistant bacteria succeed? (2014, August 14) retrieved 17 June 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-08-resistant-bacteria.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more