Neuroscience risks being the next science research bubble

November 5, 2014 by Vincent F Hendricks, The Conversation
Too late! vivaviena, CC BY-NC-SA

Science, like any other field that attracts investment, is prone to bubbles. Overly optimistic investments in scientific fields, research methods and technologies generate episodes comparable to those experienced by financial markets prior to crashing.

Assessing the toxic intellectual debt that builds up when too much liquidity is concentrated on too few assets is an important task if research funders want to avoid going short on overvalued research.

The cause of the meltdown of the financial market is obvious: leveraged trading in financial instruments that bear no relation to the things they are supposed to be secured against. Science, too, is a market in which the value of research is ultimately secured against objects in the world. If the world is not as it appears in a research paper, does the research have value?

A paper that claims that smoking causes cancer or that terrorism is caused by poverty is valuable only if it turns out to be a good explanation of cancer or terrorism. As recently noted by Philip Gerrans at the University of Adelaide, "[It] is why an original and true explanation is the gold standard of academic markets."

Hunting for bubbles

Consider the recent investments in neuroscience. No one with an interest in scientific trends and science policy will have failed to notice that is the next big thing. This narrative has been around for at least a decade, but now it is getting serious.

Take the recent award by the European Commission of €1 billion (US$1.3 billion) to the Human Brain Project to build a "supercomputer replica of the " or the US$1 billion Brain Activity Map project – "the largest and most ambitious effort in fundamental biology since the Human Genome Project" – endorsed by the US president, Barack Obama, in January 2013.

As with a leveraged investment in mortgage bonds, most bureaucrats have little or no competence in determining how these massive projects will turn out. Whether or not the expectations will be realised, research funding is framed with expectations that neuroscience will translate into jobs and growth. Neurotechnology – brain-based devices, drugs and diagnostics – is projected to be a US$145 billion industry by 2025.

It should be little surprise then to see newly emerging fields that attach "neuro" to some human trait – neuroeconomics, neuromarketing, neuropsychiatry, neuroethics – with the expectation that the techniques of neuroscience will explain the relevant human behaviour and practice.

Impending neurobubble?

The generous provision of funding for projects in creates the first precondition for a science bubble. Add to this a second precondition: the presence of speculators. Both researchers and directors of research institutes hedge their bets by supporting research strategies that follow the current fashions, publication channels and funding streams. Consider for instance the vision of a statement from the prominent experimental neuroscientist Semir Zeki:

It is only by understanding the neural laws that dictate human activity in all spheres – in law, morality, religion and even economics and politics, no less than in art – that we can ever hope to achieve a more proper understanding of the nature of man.

And this tremendous claim from a recent interview with the principal investigator of the Human Brain Project, Henry Markram:

Once you have built a [a supercomputer replica of the human] brain, anything is possible. You could take it apart to figure out the causes of brain diseases. You could rig it to robotics and develop a whole new range of intelligent technologies. You could strap on a pair of virtual reality glasses and experience a brain other than your own.

Combine these promises with a series of results from social psychology suggesting that peer reviewers, students and lay citizens are likely to find explanations of psychological phenomena more convincing when they contain neuroscientific information – even in situations when the neuroscientific information is irrelevant to the explanation.

This situation resembles a number of well-documented phenomena in social psychology and behavioural economics called "pluralistic ignorance" (a situation in which a majority of members in a group reject a norm, but incorrectly assume that most others accept it and therefore go along with it) and "bystander effects" (where the greater the number of bystanders, the less likely it is that any one of them will help a victim). So, in other words, everyone can see something is wrong but everyone expects someone else to do something about it. These have been shown to have significant impact on processing information and making judgements.

Overly optimistic research programs and claims of future scientific impacts crowd out more modest and pluralist research strategies pursued by scientists in search for novel explanations and solid evidence building. And that is what science is all about, not only mainlining what may turn out to be a science bubble.

Explore further: Scientists criticize Europe's $1.6B brain project (Update)

Related Stories

Scientists criticize Europe's $1.6B brain project (Update)

July 7, 2014
Dozens of neuroscientists are protesting Europe's $1.6 billion attempt to recreate the functioning of the human brain on supercomputers, fearing it will waste vast amounts of money and harm neuroscience in general.

Brain simulation raises questions

October 22, 2014
What does it mean to simulate the human brain? Why is it important to do so? And is it even possible to simulate the brain separately from the body it exists in? These questions are discussed in a new paper published in the ...

How myths about the brain are hampering teaching

October 16, 2014
Myths about the brain are common among teachers worldwide and are hampering teaching, according to new research published today [15 October].

To understand the brain you need electronic engineers too

July 8, 2014
Electronic engineers are emerging as important contributors to understanding of the workings of the human brain.

BRAIN initiative seeks tools to understand human thought, behavior, consciousness

April 24, 2013
The newly proposed scientific project to understand the most complicated 3 pounds of material in the world—the human brain—is the topic of an article in the current edition of Chemical & Engineering News, the weekly newsmagazine ...

Recommended for you

Attention, please! Anticipation of touch takes focus, executive skills

December 12, 2018
Anticipation is often viewed as an emotional experience, an eager wait for something to happen.

Study highlights potential benefits of continuous EEG monitoring for infant patients

December 12, 2018
A recent retrospective study evaluating continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) of children in intensive care units (ICUs) found a higher than anticipated number of seizures. The work also identified several conditions closely ...

The importins of anxiety

December 11, 2018
According to some estimates, up to one in three people around the world may experience severe anxiety in their lifetime. In a study described today in Cell Reports, researchers at the Weizmann Institute of Science have revealed ...

How returning to a prior context briefly heightens memory recall

December 11, 2018
Whether it's the pleasant experience of returning to one's childhood home over the holidays or the unease of revisiting a site that proved unpleasant, we often find that when we return to a context where an episode first ...

Neurons in the brain work as a team to guide movement of arms, hands

December 11, 2018
The apparent simplicity of picking up a cup of coffee or turning a doorknob belies the complex sequence of calculations and processes that the brain must undergo to identify the location of an item in space, move the arm ...

Using neurofeedback to prevent PTSD in soldiers

December 11, 2018
A team of researchers from Israel, the U.S. and the U.K. has found that using neurofeedback could prevent soldiers from experiencing PTSD after engaging in emotionally difficult situations. In their paper published in the ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.