E-cigarettes can be regulated now without more research, expert says

e-cigarette
Credit: TheNorlo/Wikipedia

A legal scholar and tobacco control expert says he has developed a research-based roadmap that allows for the immediate regulation of e-cigarettes.

Writing in the March issue of Food and Drug Law Journal, Eric N. Lindblom, JD, senior scholar at the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, says his proposal would minimize the threats pose to public health while still enabling them potentially help reduce smoking.

"This approach could help to heal the current split in the public health community over e-cigarettes by addressing the concerns of both sides," Lindblom says.

Lindblom, the former director of the Office of Policy at the Center for Tobacco Products at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), is on a special detail to the O'Neill Institute at Georgetown University Law Center. He says enough is already known about e-cigarettes to regulate them effectively without any further research or delay.

"We already know that using e-cigarettes is less harmful than smoking, but more harmful than not using any tobacco or nicotine at all, and that's enough to figure out how to regulate them both to protect and promote the public health," he says.

In "Effectively Regulating E-Cigarettes and Their Advertising - And the First Amendment," Lindblom writes, "Because e-cigarette use, by itself, is neither beneficial nor benign to users and nonusers, the only public health justification for allowing their marketing would be if doing so would help smokers quit completely or provide them with a less harmful way to obtain the nicotine they crave, without causing any offsetting public health harms."

Based on that observation, Lindberg suggests that an effective regulatory scheme would 1) make e-cigarettes less harmful to users and non-users; 2) increase their use as a cessation aid and as a less harmful alternative for smokers who would not otherwise quit; and 3) minimize e-cigarette use among everyone else.

Lindblom's proposal hinges on the implementation of the FDA's pending deeming rule (expected later this year), which would enable the agency to regulate all non-drug e-cigarettes as . "The deeming rule, by itself, will not minimize e-cigarette harms or maximize their public health potential," he says.

Lindblom notes that the proposal faces challenges in the United States, primarily from First Amendment constraints on government action to regulate e-cigarette advertising. His paper suggests, however, that "some helpful text and established procedures in the Tobacco Control Act reduce those constraints in this context, providing the FDA with a tremendous opportunity to place the kinds of careful restrictions and requirements on e-cigarette advertising necessary to minimize their harmful aspects and maximize their potential to produce substantial net gains."

The views expressed by Lindblom are entirely his own, and he reports having no conflicts of interest related to the Food and Drug Law Journal paper.


Explore further

Surge in e-cigarette use triggers new health research and calls for regulation

Provided by O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law
Citation: E-cigarettes can be regulated now without more research, expert says (2015, March 13) retrieved 15 February 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2015-03-e-cigarettes-expert.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
70 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Mar 13, 2015
This article is useless. A person has made a proposal - fine. *What* is the proposal? No mention of that.

Mar 14, 2015
Totalitarians can regulate anything they like as long as they have a willing executive and legislature.

Elect only honest politicians and these problems wouldn't exist. What? No honest politicians? Design a government of limited power and scope. What? You did?

In a democracy a people always get the government they deserve.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more