Face-to-face handoff doesn't improve patient outcomes

Face-to-face handoff doesn't improve patient outcomes

(HealthDay)—There are no significant improvements in patient outcomes associated with face-to-face handoff of patients admitted to general medical services at a large academic tertiary referral hospital, according to a study published in the March issue of the Journal of Hospital Medicine.

Will M. Schouten, M.D., from the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and colleagues used a Global Trigger Tool to retrospectively compare among 805 patients whose care was transitioned with and without face-to-face handoffs.

The researchers observed no significant difference in the frequency of calls, code team calls, transfers to a higher level of care, deaths in hospital, length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, or adverse events between patients whose care was transitioned with a face-to-face handoff and those whose care was transitioned without one.

"Additional study is needed to determine the qualities of patient handoff that optimize efficiency and safety," the authors write.


Explore further

Handoff tool alone insufficient to handle nighttime clinical issues

More information: Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Journal information: Journal of Hospital Medicine

Copyright © 2015 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Face-to-face handoff doesn't improve patient outcomes (2015, March 17) retrieved 10 December 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2015-03-face-to-face-handoff-doesnt-patient-outcomes.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
5 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments