Humans evolved to be taller and faster-thinking, study suggests

man
Credit: George Hodan/public domain

People have evolved to be smarter and taller than their predecessors, a study of populations around the world suggests.

Those who are born to parents from diverse genetic backgrounds tend to be taller and have sharper thinking skills than others, the major international study has found.

Researchers analysed health and from more than 100 studies carried out around the world. These included details on more than 350,000 people from urban and rural communities.

The team found that greater is linked to increased height. It is also associated with better , as well as higher levels of education.

However, genetic diversity had no effect on factors such as or , which affect a person's chances of developing heart disease, diabetes and other complex conditions.

Researchers from the University of Edinburgh examined individuals' entire genetic make-up. They pinpointed instances in which people had inherited identical copies of genes from both their mother and their father - an indicator that their ancestors were related.

Where few instances of this occur in a person's genes, it indicates greater genetic diversity in their heritage and the two sides of their family are unlikely to be distantly related.

It had been thought that close family ties would raise a person's risk of complex diseases but the researchers found this not to be the case. The only traits they found to be affected by genetic diversity are height and the ability to think quickly.

The findings suggest that over time, evolution is favouring people with increased stature and sharper thinking skills but does not impact on their propensity for developing a serious illness.

The study is published in the journal Nature and was funded by the Medical Research Council.

Dr Jim Wilson, of the University of Edinburgh's Usher Institute, said: "This study highlights the power of large-scale genetic analyses to uncover fundamental information about our evolutionary history."

Dr Peter Joshi, of the University of Edinburgh's Usher Institute, said: "Our research answers questions first posed by Darwin as to the benefits of genetic diversity. Our next step will be to hone in on the specific parts of the genome that most benefit from diversity."


Explore further

Link between autism genes and higher intelligence, study suggests

More information: Nature, DOI: 10.1038/nature14618
Journal information: Nature

Citation: Humans evolved to be taller and faster-thinking, study suggests (2015, July 1) retrieved 18 July 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2015-07-humans-evolved-taller-faster-thinking.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
249 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jul 01, 2015
Perhaps the protein previously directed to radiation defense --when the Earth's core heated and produced gases exhausted at the planets surface--were available for larger brains and muscles once the radiation was reduced.
You can see this in Chernobyl in reverse.

Jul 01, 2015
"Humans evolved to be taller and faster-thinking, study suggests"
I don't think the study makes a suggestion of this nature at all.

Jul 01, 2015
"Since directional dominance is predicted for traits under directional evolutionary selection7, this study provides evidence that increased stature and cognitive function have been positively selected in human evolution, whereas many important risk factors for late-onset complex diseases may not have been."
http://www.nature...618.html

Jul 01, 2015
What I think this study demonstrates is existence of evolutionary pressure, not evolution per se.
To demonstrate that we are evolving one would need to demonstrate emergence of new mutations, not just shuffling of existing alleles around.

Jul 02, 2015
What I think this study demonstrates is existence of evolutionary pressure, not evolution per se.
To demonstrate that we are evolving one would need to demonstrate emergence of new mutations, not just shuffling of existing alleles around.

What would constitute a "new mutation"?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more