Ustekinumab more effective than TNF-alpha inhibitors in psoriasis

Ustekinumab more effective than TNF-α inhibitors in psoriasis

(HealthDay)—For patients with psoriasis, ustekinumab is more effective than tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors, according to a study published in the May issue of the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Bruce E. Strober, M.D., Ph.D., from the University of Connecticut Health Center in Farmington, and colleagues compared therapeutic responses among patients from the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR) initiating infliximab, adalimumab, or versus ustekinumab. At six and 12 months, the authors assessed the proportion of patients achieving a Physician Global Assessment score of clear/minimal (0/1) and percentage of body surface area with psoriasis.

Efficacy data were available for 2,076 new users: 1,041 ustekinumab, 116 infliximab, 662 adalimumab, and 257 etanercept. The researchers found that the likelihood of achieving a Physician Global Assessment score 0/1 was significantly lower for receiving tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors versus ustekinumab (odds ratios: 0.396 for infliximab, 0.686 for adalimumab, and 0.554 for etanercept at six months; odds ratio: 0.449 for infliximab at 12 months). A significantly greater mean decrease in percentage of body surface area with was seen for ustekinumab versus adalimumab and etanercept at six months and for ustekinumab versus infliximab and etanercept at 12 months.

"In PSOLAR, effectiveness of ustekinumab was significantly better versus all three factor-α inhibitors studied for the majority of comparisons at six and 12 months," the authors write.

Several authors disclosed financial ties to pharmaceutical companies, including Janssen, which manufacturers ustekinumab and funded the study.

Explore further

Anti-TNF treatment ups ANA positivity in psoriasis

More information: Abstract
Full Text

Copyright © 2016 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Ustekinumab more effective than TNF-alpha inhibitors in psoriasis (2016, April 22) retrieved 30 September 2020 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments