Changing our understanding of consciousness

June 9, 2016
Changing our understanding of consciousness
Credit: Monash University

Measuring and defining consciousness has been an ongoing challenge for neuroscientists, philosophers and psychologists for centuries. The concept of levels of consciousness is mostly theoretical, limiting the abilities of researchers to develop objective measurement and understanding of how different global states of consciousness relate to each other.

Diagnostic scales such as the Glasgow Coma Scale rank based on various behavioural criteria. Professor Jakob Hohwy, School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies, and his team have argued that the idea of consciousness levels is wrong. Professor Hohwy and his colleagues believe that unlike the human body's more objective measurements, such as blood pressure and height, consciousness has dimensions rather than definable levels.

For example, a person in a can't lift their arm when asked, while a conscious person can. But ask either to imagine themselves playing tennis - as a now famous study by co-author Adrian Owen of the University of Western Ontario did - and their brains may well light up in the same way. Clearly, their state of consciousness differs, however both may share an awareness and ability to respond to verbal demands.

The Hohwy team argues that the notion of a single scale doesn't fit within the little we know about consciousness. Professor Hohwy, who is associate dean of research in the Faculty of Arts and principal investigator of the Philosophy & Cognition lab, argues subjective experience cannot be partial.

"It's either something you have or you don't. And if subjective experience can't be put on a single sliding scale, neither can consciousness," he said.

The complexity and intangibility of consciousness can lead to the perception that it is a concept belonging only in the world of theoretical academia. However, consciousness research has significant and real-life implications. Gaining a greater understanding of consciousness could lead to more ethical end-of-life decisions for people with severe brain injuries.

"You're always either conscious or not conscious, but then it's a matter of how much you're conscious of, and what you're doing with that consciousness," Professor Hohwy said.

Rather than asking how conscious a person is, a better question might be to ask what the person is conscious of. Are they conscious of loved ones' voices at their bedside, or only unintelligible noises? This could mean additional tests, such as brain imaging, to assess a person's cognitive abilities.

Explore further: Abnormal brain interactions harm consciousness

More information: Tim Bayne et al. Are There Levels of Consciousness?, Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2016). DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.009

Related Stories

Abnormal brain interactions harm consciousness

May 2, 2016

Over the past few years, a great amount of scientific research has shown that even when the brain is "at rest" it still works. The brains of healthy people are organized into regions displaying similar activity, called resting-state ...

How the brain produces consciousness in 'time slices'

April 12, 2016

EPFL scientists propose a new way of understanding of how the brain processes unconscious information into our consciousness. According to the model, consciousness arises only in time intervals of up to 400 milliseconds, ...

What makes us conscious?

March 16, 2016

Do you think that the machine you are reading this story on, right now, has a feeling of "what it is like" to be in its state?

Brain scans may help predict recovery from coma

November 11, 2015

Brain scans of people in a coma may help predict who will regain consciousness, according to a study published in the November 11, 2015, online issue of Neurology, the medical journal of the American Academy of Neurology. ...

Recommended for you

Brains of one-handed people suggest new organization theory

April 20, 2017

In people born with one hand, the brain region that would normally light up with that missing hand's activity lights up instead with the activity of other body parts—including the arm, foot, and mouth—that fill in for ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

MrVibrating
not rated yet Jun 09, 2016
Hohwy's conclusion that it is more meaningful to ask what one is conscious of, rather than whether one is or isn't, is also consistent with regards to sleeping consciousness (dreaming etc.)

IMHO consciousness processes meta-information. That's its primary purpose and specialisation. It tracks the context of sensory information - of what all that information is 'about', and what it means.

But meta-information processing isn't the exclusive preserve of neocortex - it begins at the sensory level, increases at the thalamus and then intensifies via thalamocortical feed-forward and feedback cycles, and thus conscious awareness.

The cerebellum also probably performs much processing of metadata, and so likely has a degree of 'consiousness'..

So i think that levels or degrees of consciousness may yet be a valid concpet - there's obviously quantitive thresholds marking network-scale phase transitions (ie. awake vs asleep), but it's qualitatively the same kind of processing..

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.