Study points to importance of subsidy structure in Affordable Care Act

February 28, 2017 by Tina Cormier, University of Chicago

One of the challenges for Congressional Republicans looking to replace the Affordable Care Act is how to address federal subsidies, which millions of Americans use to pay for health insurance.

In a new study, economists at the University of Chicago and Harvard University examine how the structure of subsidies can ripple through markets, affecting both incentives for insurers and market competition. Their findings were released as a National Bureau of Economic Research working paper in January.

"A few years ago some key economic concepts were missing from much of the debate around the Affordable Care Act," said Sonia Jaffe, an author of the working paper and postdoctoral scholar at UChicago's Becker Friedman Institute for Research in Economics. "We wanted to revisit this question of the optimal subsidy structure from a framework of how economists think about incentives."

Jaffe and co-author Mark Shepard, assistant professor of public policy at Harvard's Kennedy School, consider the theoretical and practical implications of linking subsidies to set by insurers versus setting subsidies fixed at a specific level based on external benchmarks.

Through health insurance exchanges, the Affordable Care Act offers a variety of subsidized, private plans. Federal subsidies provided to millions of low-income Americans are linked to the pricing of such plans.

The researchers said the price-linked approach can help buffer consumers against shocks and uncertainties in the market because subsidies change in tandem with insurance prices. But it also can produce some unintended consequences: When there is only a single insurer present in a market, price-linked subsidies can encourage large markups to prices without any loss of demand. Even in less extreme cases, competition can be muted, leading to increased prices and higher government spending on subsidies.

In legislation proposed to replace the Affordable Care Act, the federal government would shift to fixed subsidies indexed to measures of health care inflation. This approach can lead to lower prices and avoid the competitive distortion of their price-linked counterparts. However, the is often uncertain, so unanticipated price changes could hurt consumers in the case of higher-than-expected costs or lead to unnecessary government spending on subsidies if market prices decrease. Still, the benefits of fixed subsidies often outweigh those of price-linking in mature markets where uncertainty is low, the researchers said.

In an effort to tease out tradeoffs between the two alternatives, Jaffe and Shepard used data from the Massachusetts exchange to simulate insurance market competition. They first assumed that costs—and therefore prices—behave as expected by regulators. Their second analysis considered conditions in which market costs differ from regulators' expectations.

The simulations reveal that price-linked subsidies create distortions, with prices higher than they would have been under a fixed subsidy. Using estimates from Massachusetts in 2011, they find that when regulators tied subsidies to prices in a market where uncertainty is low and prices perform as expected, the result is up to 6 percent higher prices for the cheapest plan. That's likely because insurance companies can raise prices without losing as many customers, the researchers said.

Such an increase may sound modest, but it translates into $46 million in annual subsidy costs in Massachusetts and more than $3 billion if extrapolated nationally under the Affordable Care Act.

When costs are as expected, fixed subsidies result in a combination of higher consumer surplus and lower government costs. However, as market prices diverge from regulators' expectations, price-linked subsidies begin to perform better. Price-linked subsidies automatically rise and fall in response to cost shocks, ensuring that low-income enrollees are protected when prices unexpectedly increase.

"There are tradeoffs between the two subsidy policies. If set intelligently and adjusted yearly to reflect local health care prices, fixed subsidies could lower costs. However, if fixed subsidies are set too broadly or just linked to inflation, they will likely be worse than price-linked in the long run," Jaffe said.

Explore further: 11 million will lose health insurance if ACA subsidies are eliminated, study finds

More information: Price-linked subsidies and health insurance markups.

Related Stories

11 million will lose health insurance if ACA subsidies are eliminated, study finds

October 21, 2014
Eliminating subsidies that help low- and moderate-income people purchase coverage through government-run health insurance marketplaces would sharply boost costs for consumers and cause more than 11 million Americans to lose ...

Eliminating ACA subsidies would cause nearly 10 million to lose insurance, study finds

January 8, 2015
Eliminating government subsidies for low- and moderate-income people who purchase coverage through federally run health insurance marketplaces would sharply boost costs and reduce enrollment in the individual market by more ...

Rise in premiums lays bare two Americas on health care

February 21, 2017
Michael Schwarz is a self-employed business owner who buys his own health insurance. The subsidized coverage "Obamacare" offers provides protection from life's unpredictable changes and freedom to pursue his vocation, he ...

Report projects health care costs to dip slightly

April 14, 2014
A new government report says the Affordable Care Act's health insurance subsidies will cost a little less than previously thought.

Sticker shock often follows insurance cancellation

November 2, 2013
Millions of people across the country are trying to figure out what to do after receiving notices that their individual health insurance policies are being discontinued because they don't meet higher benefit requirements ...

Study: Premium hikes add $10B to taxpayers' health law tab (Update)

December 15, 2016
Taxpayers will fork over nearly $10 billion more next year to cover double-digit premium hikes for subsidized health insurance under President Barack Obama's law, according to a study being released Thursday.

Recommended for you

Widespread declines in life expectancy across high income countries coincide with rising young adult, midlife mortality

August 15, 2018
The ongoing opioid epidemic in the United States is a key contributor to the most recent declines in life expectancy, suggests a study published by The BMJ today.

Diets high in vegetables and fish may lower risk of multiple sclerosis

August 15, 2018
People who consume a diet high in vegetables and fish may have a reduced risk of multiple sclerosis, new research led by Curtin University has found.

Can sleeping too much lead to an early death?

August 15, 2018
A recent study in the Journal of the American Heart Association has led to headlines that will make you rethink your Saturday morning sleep in.

Parental life span predicts daughters living to 90 without chronic disease or disability

August 15, 2018
Researchers at the University of California San Diego School of Medicine report that women whose mothers lived to at least age 90 were more likely to also live to 90, free of serious diseases and disabilities.

Mixing energy drinks with alcohol could enhance the negative effects of binge drinking

August 14, 2018
A key ingredient of energy drinks could be exacerbating some of the negative effects of binge drinking according to a new study.

New study finds fake, low-quality medicines prevalent in the developing world

August 10, 2018
A new study from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill found that substandard and falsified medicines, including medicines to treat malaria, are a serious problem in much of the world. In low- and middle-income ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.