2000 to 2014 saw increase in vitamin D deficiency in children

2000 to 2014 saw increase in vitamin D deficiency in children

(HealthDay)—From 2000 to 2014 there was an increase in the rate of vitamin D deficiency diagnosis among children, according to a study published online Feb. 3 in Pediatrics.

Emre Basatemur, M.B.B.S., from the Institute of Child Health at University College London, and colleagues conducted a using primary care records of 711,788 children aged 0 to 17 years to examine the incidence rates for diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency every year from 2000 to 2014.

The researchers found that from 2000 to 2014 there was an increase in the crude rate of vitamin D deficiency diagnosis from 3.14 to 261 per 100,000 person-years. Between 2008 and 2014 there was a 15-fold increase in diagnosis after accounting for changes in demographic characteristics. There were independent associations between older age (≥10 years), nonwhite ethnicity, and and higher rates of diagnosis. Diagnosis rates were higher in boys versus girls aged <5 years, while rates were higher in girls aged ≥10 years.

"There has been a marked increase in diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency in children over the past decade," the authors write. "Future research should explore the drivers for this change in diagnostic behavior and the reasons prompting investigation of vitamin D status in clinical practice."

More information: Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Journal information: Pediatrics

Copyright © 2017 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: 2000 to 2014 saw increase in vitamin D deficiency in children (2017, February 4) retrieved 25 April 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2017-02-vitamin-d-deficiency-children.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Study looks at why vitamin D deficiency diagnoses surged

3 shares

Feedback to editors