Why did we see 'the dress' differently? The answer lies in the shadows, new research finds

April 7, 2017
Credit: Reproduced with permission from Cecilia Bleasdale.

When "the dress" went viral in 2015, millions were divided on its true colors: gold and white or black and blue? In a new study, New York University neuroscientist Pascal Wallisch concludes that these differences in perception are due to our assumptions about how the dress was illuminated.

Those who thought that the dress, worn by the mother of a bride at a wedding in Scotland, was photographed in a shadow likely saw the garment as and white; by contrast, those who thought it was illuminated by artificial light were more likely to see it as black and blue.

"The original image was overexposed, rendering the illumination source uncertain," explains Wallisch, who serves as a clinical assistant professor in NYU's Department of Psychology. "As a result, we make assumptions about how the dress was illuminated, which affects the colors we see."

"Shadows are blue, so we mentally subtract the blue light in order to view the image, which then appears in bright colors—gold and white," Wallisch continues. "However, artificial light tends to be yellowish, so if we see it brightened in this fashion, we factor out this , leaving us with a dress that we see as black and blue.

"This is a basic cognitive function: to appreciate the color on an object, the illumination source has to be taken into account, which the brain does continuously."

The findings, based on an online study with more than 13,000 , appear in the Journal of Vision.

The study's participants, who had previously seen the dress, were asked whether or not they believed it was in a shadow.

These beliefs—about whether or not the dress was in a shadow— strongly affected the perceptual experience of the dress. Among those who saw it in a shadow, four out of five participants believed it to be white and gold; by contrast, only about half of participants who did not see it in a saw the garment bearing these colors.

Wallisch then considered what could explain these findings. He hypothesized that differing perceptions could be linked to one's exposure to daylight—quite simply, people who rise and go to bed early, and spend many of their waking hours in sunlight (i.e., under a blue sky), are more likely to see the dress as white and gold than are night owls, whose world is illuminated not by the sun, but, rather, by long-wavelength artificial light.

To test this, he asked participants if they go to bed early and feel best in the morning (i.e., "larks") or if they like to sleep in and feel best at night ("owls"), then matched this self-identified circadian type with how they saw the dress. Consistent with the hypothesis, larks were significantly more likely to see the dress as white and gold—relative to owls—underscoring the relative effects of exposure to daylight.

"This suggests that whatever kind of light one is typically exposed to influences how one perceives color," Wallisch says.

Conversely, demographic factors such as gender and age had comparatively small effects on the perception of the image.

The findings broaden our understanding of how a bistable stimulus—i.e., one that is fundamentally ambiguous and open to subjective interpretation—works in color perception and, more specifically, offer new insights into a long-standing question about : Is the color you see the same color I see?

"The answer—based on this research - is 'not necessarily'," Wallisch observes. "If illumination conditions are unclear, your assumptions about the illumination source will matter, and those might depend on lifestyle choices, such as when you go to sleep."

Explore further: Black/blue or white/gold? Dress debate goes viral

Related Stories

Black/blue or white/gold? Dress debate goes viral

February 27, 2015
Is the dress black and blue, or white and gold? That question is lighting up the Internet.

Is #TheDress white and gold or blue and black? Rice expert on visual perception weighs in

March 4, 2015
On Feb. 26, a picture of a cocktail dress originally uploaded to the blog Tumblr swept the Internet and managed to divide the population over a simple question: What color is the dress? Some viewers saw gold and white while ...

Three perspectives on 'The Dress'

May 14, 2015
When you look at this photograph, what colors are the dress? Some see blue and black stripes, others see white and gold stripes. This striking variation took the internet by storm in February; now Current Biology is publishing ...

The brain's dress code

October 14, 2015
One dress—two perceptions. For some, it is black-blue, for others, it is white-gold. In a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, the neuroplasticity group headed by Prof. T. Schmidt-Wilcke (Department of Neurology, ...

Blue or green? United Kingdom split over color of swatch

June 22, 2016
A survey from a Scottish eye care company could be sparking a color controversy similar to last year's debate over the color of a dress.

Recommended for you

Nature or nurture? Innate social behaviors in the mouse brain

October 18, 2017
Adult male mice have a simple repertoire of innate, or instinctive, social behaviors: When encountering a female, a male mouse will try to mate with it, and when encountering another male, the mouse will attack. The animals ...

Brain activity predicts crowdfunding outcomes better than self-reports

October 18, 2017
Surveys and self-reports are a time-honored way of trying to predict consumer behavior, but they have limitations. People often give socially desirable answers or they simply don't know or remember things clearly.

Brain-machine interfaces to treat neurological disease

October 18, 2017
Since the 19th century at least, humans have wondered what could be accomplished by linking our brains – smart and flexible but prone to disease and disarray – directly to technology in all its cold, hard precision. Writers ...

Changing stroke definitions is causing chaos, warns professor

October 18, 2017
Proposals to change the definitions of stroke and related conditions are causing confusion and chaos in clinical practice and research, a Monash University associate professor has warned.

Navigational view of the brain thanks to powerful X-rays

October 18, 2017
If brain imaging could be compared to Google Earth, neuroscientists would already have a pretty good "satellite view" of the brain, and a great "street view" of neuron details. But navigating how the brain computes is arguably ...

'Wasabi receptor' for pain discovered in flatworms

October 18, 2017
A Northwestern University research team has discovered how scalding heat and tissue injury activate an ancient "pain" receptor in simple animals. The findings could lead to new strategies for analgesic drug design for the ...

7 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

dmkruse
not rated yet Apr 07, 2017
So, what does it mean for people who see the dress as brown and purple? I see no black, blue, white or gold (I guess my brown is the gold and my purple is the blue?)
JamesG
1 / 5 (1) Apr 07, 2017
Interesting. I see gold and blue although the gold could be brown in shadow. What were the actual colors?
dnatwork
not rated yet Apr 07, 2017
I don't know why all of these experts talk about human perceptual biases, but I have never seen any of them comment on the camera and display.

None of us has actually seen the dress; we are seeing a picture taken by a digital camera that cannot register the full color gamut, compressed and transmitted over the internet, interpreted by a CPU/GPU according to some standard or other that does not include the full color gamut, and displayed on a monitor that cannot handle the color gamut even if you had it available, and that almost certainly has never been calibrated. None of us is looking at the object. Each of us is looking at a shadow of a reflection of a guess, and we are all looking looking at different ones.

What really needs to be explained is how anyone agrees on any two color pairs in this situation.
RobertKarlStonjek
not rated yet Apr 08, 2017
I have two monitors on the same computer, an newer LED lit and an older fluoro type (both LCD monitors, 1200 vertical res) and shifting the dress from one to the other makes the white part change from dead white (on the fluoro) to slight blue tinge (LED) because the older fluoro types introduce a slight brownish tinge to white, cancelling out the blue. The gold changes from light gold to dark gold...I don't understand how anyone could think it was black...
HenryE
not rated yet Apr 08, 2017
It is very easy to see it in either set of colors. If you look at the image without much ambient lighting, it will tend to look white and gold. Now, turn a bright light source toward you while you are looking at the dress and suddenly it will look blue and black. It could all just be due to the lighting level around a person when they viewed the image. Your pupil contracts with brighter light, and apparently that change also changes the perceived color.
adam_russell_9615
not rated yet Apr 09, 2017
I guess that sounds reasonable, except that I never even considered that it was artificial light and dont see how someone could think that. The background totally looks sun lit.

Did anyone here see it as indoor lighting?
brainlessbarbarian
not rated yet Apr 11, 2017
Yes, I see it as artificial light. The way the colors look seems like a really bad photo taken with a digital camera that has the wrong settings, while also in really bad lighting conditions. The top right corner has reflected light looking white like you'd expect sunlight to be, but if you check the bottom corner of the mirror you can see a reflection of the wall, which is bright yellow looking. Then below the mirror you have white looking paint on the wall that fades into a yellowish tinge in where the light isn't as strong. Looks like really basic off-white paint and incandescent lighting.

What I don't get is why people think the dress is in a shadow. There are shadows on a couple parts of the dress. Shadows with sharp edges from protruding bits blocking a strong light source shining on it from above and slightly to the left. You also see highlights on the fabric.

I've had older digital cameras produce similar looking bad pictures indoors, so that's what I think of right away.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.