How prejudice pushes low-income people onto an unhealthy diet

August 11, 2017 by Kelly J Hodgins, The Conversation
Fresh produce for sale at a farmer’s market. Credit: Shutterstock

As consumers become increasingly dissatisfied with conventional, large-scale food systems, they are seeking ways to reconnect with their food. For the wealthy, that translates into a turn toward what we call the "alternative food system."

My extensive research into North American food insecurity examines the inequality inherent in that trend. It highlights that only people who can afford to "vote with their forks" are able to support this emerging system—one that is understood to be more ethical, more sustainable and more transparent.

My research also discusses options for smoothing out the inequality in the alternative food movement, and lands on as a major solution.

Before you throw your hands up, saying policy change is a challenge someone else should tackle, I invite you to read on, because I also uncovered major problems with our societal attitudes. These are what you and I need to explore —and tackle directly —if we have any hope of implementing the necessary policy changes.

Low-income people unfairly stereotyped

My interviews revealed that alternative food retailers lacked awareness or concern about low-income Canadians facing . When asked about widening food access to this demographic, it wasn't uncommon to hear responses like: "We really don't think about that very much. We don't help people that much."

This is perhaps understandable, given these retailers' focus on supporting small farmers. However, in the conversations spurred by publishing this research, I have come to realize that everyday Canadians are also oblivious to poverty-induced food insecurity that afflicts one in eight households in Canada. Worse still, this ignorance feeds into a larger societal discourse: one that views people living in poverty negatively.

Other researchers have found that when it comes to food, people of low socioeconomic status are understood to have fewer food skills, less knowledge about food and less desire for nutritious foods. These assumptions are invalid, but pervasive.

I heard participants say things like: "A lot of low-income people are used to highly processed foods … and may not buy fresh or local if it were less expensive." Or: "They haven't made the connection … that food is going into my body, and that's the most important thing that I can do for my own health." These opinions are based on little, if any, evidence.

Unpacking assumptions

It is important to remember that food access is a product of three distinct factors: physical, economic and informational. Interestingly, though, we have a tendency to neglect the first two—our proximity to healthy food, and our ability to afford it. Instead, we blame the individual, characterising someone who doesn't make "good" food choices as uninformed.

A great example comes from one of my participants who reasoned that if educated, middle-class consumers don't always buy her food, why would lower-income, "less educated" people? Problematically, her response conflates low income with low education. Further, it perpetuates an idea that food access is only a matter of "choice." It's not: Remember, physical and economic barriers to accessing healthy food are immense, and these aren't the fault—or the choice—of an individual.

I also heard: "They don't know how to deal with fresh vegetables day after day," which again reflects a perception that low-income consumers are one homogenous group—one that is somehow less knowledgeable about food than anyone with a higher income. In fact, many Canadians don't know how to prepare fresh vegetables day after day. Wealthy shoppers, however, can disguise their lack of culinary skills by eating out or purchasing prepared foods.

'What's the point?'

Many in broader society have asked with condescension "what is the point" of this research, employing tired generalisations that "poor people" are accustomed to food bank handouts, and that they wouldn't want healthy food if it were given to them.

As I discuss in my research, policy changes are critically necessary to break down these food system hierarchies. However, it's important to recognise that shopping spaces (whether markets, shops or stores) are shaped by the political systems and sociocultural contexts in which they exist.

For as long as socially constructed attitudes perpetuate oppressive stereotypes about "what low-income people want," we can't work toward eliminating inequalities in the food system.

Policy changes are necessary to make affordable (without putting farmers out of business) and to lift all Canadians to a point where they can afford to buy it. But such policy change requires a shift in societal attitudes, where Canadians demand that food should be a right.

I am not envisioning a future where everyone purchases $5 bundles of organic kale and swears off Kraft Dinner. Instead, I advocate for consumer agency when it comes to food access. With increased agency and capacity, Canadians can purchase what they wish: heirloom tomatoes or canned tomato soup. It's about choice.

If we want all Canadians to have access to culturally appropriate, nutritious food, we need to deconstruct these negative assumptions, increase our collective level of empathy, and advocate for food justice, so that everyone can choose the foods they like in a country that overflows with abundance.

Explore further: New report says 3.9 million Canadians struggle to afford food

Related Stories

New report says 3.9 million Canadians struggle to afford food

July 25, 2013
A new report by researchers at the University of Toronto shows that almost four million Canadians are struggling to put the food they need on the table because of food insecurity.

Lack of transportation limits healthy food access among Washington State residents

February 8, 2017
Having convenient or reasonable access to supermarkets is often associated with healthier diets and a lower risk for obesity among neighborhood residents. However, simply improving residents' proximity to grocery stores may ...

Urban food initiative ethical for addressing food issues

August 19, 2014
(HealthDay)—The urban food initiative (UFI) seems to be a safe and ethical approach to addressing obesity and food insecurity, according to a viewpoint piece published online Aug. 18 in JAMA Pediatrics.

Half-a-million people experience food insecurity in British Columbia, says new report

August 31, 2016
Almost half a million British Columbians experienced some level of household food insecurity in 2011-2012, according to a new report from PROOF, a research group based at the University of Toronto.

Recommended for you

Placental accumulation of flame retardant chemical alters serotonin production in rats

January 22, 2018
A North Carolina State University-led research team has shown a connection between exposure to a widely used flame retardant chemical mixture and disruption of normal placental function in rats, leading to altered production ...

Marijuana use does not lower chances of getting pregnant

January 22, 2018
Marijuana use—by either men or women—does not appear to lower a couple's chances of getting pregnant, according to a new study led by Boston University School of Public Health (BUSPH) researchers.

Women run faster after taking newly developed supplement, study finds

January 19, 2018
A new study found that women who took a specially prepared blend of minerals and nutrients for a month saw their 3-mile run times drop by almost a minute.

Americans are getting more sleep

January 19, 2018
Although more than one in three Americans still don't get enough sleep, a new analysis shows first signs of success in the fight for more shut eye. According to data from 181,335 respondents aged 15 and older who participated ...

Wine is good for you—to a point

January 18, 2018
The Mediterranean diet has become synonymous with healthy eating, but there's one thing in it that stands out: It's cool to drink wine.

Sleep better, lose weight?

January 17, 2018
(HealthDay)—Sleeplessness could cost you when it's time to stand on your bathroom scale, a new British study suggests.

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.