Prenatal weight talks are easier with props

Significant improvements in communication between providers and patients surrounding gestational weight gain during prenatal care were found using a new combination of education and a tracking tool in a study by the Mother Baby clinical service line of Allina Health and Children's Minnesota.

"Because weight may be a sensitive issue, many providers are uncomfortable talking about it. Using an objective tool may help communication," said Marijo Aguilera, M.D., a maternal-fetal specialist with Minnesota Perinatal Physicians, part of Allina Health.

Compared with control clinics, patients at intervention clinics were more likely to remember that a provider gave them advice about (92 vs. 66 percent); be satisfied with the discussion with their provider about weight (83 vs. 64 percent), and report a prenatal weight gain target that fit within guidelines (72 vs. 50 percent).

To address what has been learned about how prenatal weight gain can affect the health of both mothers and babies, the federal government issued revised guidelines for prenatal weight gain in 2009. However, it is estimated that more than half of expectant mothers either gain too much or too little weight during pregnancy. The researchers say improving education and communication about the gain guidelines is an important step towards improving outcomes.

The study, Examination of Routine Use of Prenatal Weight Gain Charts as a Communication Tool for Providers, funded by the Abbott Northwestern Hospital Foundation, appears in the October issue of the Maternal and Child Health Journal.

Explore further

Weight gain greater, less than recommended during pregnancy linked with increased risk of adverse outcomes

More information: Marijo Aguilera et al, Examination of Routine Use of Prenatal Weight Gain Charts as a Communication Tool for Providers, Maternal and Child Health Journal (2017). DOI: 10.1007/s10995-017-2308-x
Provided by Allina Health
Citation: Prenatal weight talks are easier with props (2017, September 25) retrieved 22 October 2021 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors