Primary care unable to adequately care for cancer survivors

Primary care unable to adequately care for cancer survivors
Seventy-five percent of cancer survivors are seen in primary care practices, but more must be done to meet their health care needs, says a new study.  Credit: Rutgers University

Primary care medicine is currently not able to meet the health care needs of cancer survivors, despite a decade-long effort by the medical establishment to move long-term survivorship care out of the specialists' realm, according to a new Rutgers study.

The study, published  recently in JAMA Internal Medicine, examined 12 advanced practices selected from a national registry of workforce innovators. Not one had a comprehensive survivorship care program in place.

"This is troubling because these are highly innovative practices that have a national reputation," said study co-author  Benjamin Crabtree, a medical anthropologist who is a professor in the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School (RWJMS) and a member of the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey. "As more and more people survive , there will not be enough oncologists to follow these patients and meet their health care needs."

According to the National Cancer Institute, there are 15.5 million in the United States, a number expected to increase by 31 percent to 20.3 million, by 2026. The vast majority of these patients are seen in primary care practices.

A decade ago the Institute of Medicine released a seminal report, From Cancer Patient to Survivor: Lost in Translation, outlining the need for well-informed primary care survivorship physicians and identifying the components of care. Survivorship care includes checking for cancer re-occurrence, monitoring long-term effects of radiation and chemotherapy treatment and assessing a patient's psychological well-being.     

The researchers, who over two years spent 10 to 12 days observing each of the practices (based in Colorado, Illinois, Maine, New York, Pennsylvania and Washington) and interviewing clinicians and administrators, identified several barriers to integrating into primary medicine.

  • No distinct clinical category for clinicians to identify cancer survivors exists. "There is no diagnosis code for 'cancer survivor' that can be entered into the medical record, which is important if you want physicians to pay attention," Crabtree said.
  • Electronic medical records (EHR) used in primary care practices have limited capability to record information on patients' cancer history and clinicians are not provided with actionable recommendations for follow up care. 
  • Medical records sometimes are lost as patients change clinicians over the years, leaving patients to report their cancer histories to their primary care doctors.

In addition to these issues, are concerned about their knowledge gaps in cancer care and the need to monitor changing information in oncology. "There is nothing in the residency curriculum about cancer survivorship," Crabtree said. "There is also nothing in Continuing Medical Education courses. It's just not there."

Only by correcting these deficiencies, can comprehensive cancer survivorship services move to the forefront of primary care, the study states.

 "Seventy-five percent of survivors are seen in primary care," the authors write, "demonstrating a reliance on primary care to address their needs; however, those needs are currently not being met."

Explore further

New guidelines address long-term needs of colorectal cancer survivors

Journal information: JAMA Internal Medicine

Provided by Rutgers University
Citation: Primary care unable to adequately care for cancer survivors (2017, October 6) retrieved 26 November 2020 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments