Researchers suggest risk preference should be considered a psychological trait like intelligence

October 5, 2017 by Bob Yirka, Medical Xpress report
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

(Medical Xpress)—A small team of researchers with the University of Basel in Switzerland has conducted a study of risk preference in people and has found evidence that suggests risk preference should be considered a psychological trait like intelligence. In their paper published on the open access site Science Advances, the group describes the experiments they carried out and what they found when studying their results.

A lot of work has gone into developing methods for measuring how intelligent a person is, resulting in standardized tests that are believed to be reasonably reliable. More recently, brain scientists and cognitive specialists have begun to wonder if there might be other brain-associated characteristics that might be measurable and subjected to , as well. In this new effort, the researchers have focused on preference or aversion, and the possibility that it might be measurable and compared to others, offering a scale of sorts.

To learn more about how eager people are to engage in risky behavior, the researchers enlisted the assistance of 1500 volunteer adults to take a series of tests (39 tests in all), which together were meant to gauge a person's desire to seek out risky behavior. The team then analyzed the data and found that 61 percent of the variation in risky behavior scores could be summed up with a single component—a person's risk preference quotient, if you will. The remaining factors could all be attributed to which particular type of risk was involved. The single component, which the team dubbed as R, is general, the team notes, which suggests it can be applied multiple to risk situations along with other factors attributable to a particular type of risk.

The researchers cannot explain why an individual might have a given score (which offers insight into how likely they are to engage in risky behavior), but suggest it might have to do with genetics or perhaps a stronger or weaker ability to assess the possible outcomes of risky . They also note that other factors might contribute to a risk factor, such as natural chemical reactions that occur when exposed to a possible risk or differences in factors that contribute to inhibition. The team concludes by suggesting their study offers evidence that risk should be classified as an enduring cognitive trait.

Explore further: Brain scans reveal why we are more likely to take risks if we see others doing so

More information: Renato Frey et al. Risk preference shares the psychometric structure of major psychological traits, Science Advances (2017). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1701381

Abstract
To what extent is there a general factor of risk preference, R, akin to g, the general factor of intelligence? Can risk preference be regarded as a stable psychological trait? These conceptual issues persist because few attempts have been made to integrate multiple risk-taking measures, particularly measures from different and largely unrelated measurement traditions (self-reported propensity measures assessing stated preferences, incentivized behavioral measures eliciting revealed preferences, and frequency measures assessing actual risky activities). Adopting a comprehensive psychometric approach (1507 healthy adults completing 39 risk-taking measures, with a subsample of 109 participants completing a retest session after 6 months), we provide a substantive empirical foundation to address these issues, finding that correlations between propensity and behavioral measures were weak. Yet, a general factor of risk preference, R, emerged from stated preferences and generalized to specific and actual real-world risky activities (for example, smoking). Moreover, R proved to be highly reliable across time, indicative of a stable psychological trait. Our findings offer a first step toward a general mapping of the construct risk preference, which encompasses both general and domain-specific components, and have implications for the assessment of risk preference in the laboratory and in the wild.

Related Stories

Brain scans reveal why we are more likely to take risks if we see others doing so

March 22, 2016
(Medical Xpress)—A combined team of researchers from the University of Melbourne and the California Institute of Technology has located a part of the brain involved in behavior contagion, by conducting a study involving ...

Anxious people worry about risk, not loss

June 6, 2017
Life is a series of choices. Every time you make a decision, there is a possibility that things won't go as expected (risk) or that something bad will happen (loss). Aversion to risk and loss have powerful influences on how ...

High stakes, high risk, and a bad bet: Study shines new light on the brains of gambling addicts

April 14, 2017
You've been losing all night, and now another bad hand. So why raise?

Study suggests risky aspects of teen brains can be tamed by circumstances

March 10, 2017
An international team of researchers has found that despite having brains that make them more risk-prone, recklessness by teens is not an inevitable part of adolescence. In their paper published in the journal Developmental ...

Risk-taking behaviors tied to racial disparities in HIV in gay communities

November 14, 2016
On the surface, data indicate that gay black men are 4.5 times as likely to have HIV, while white gay men are 16 times as likely than heterosexual men of their same race.

Recommended for you

Psychiatric disorders share an underlying genetic basis

June 21, 2018
Psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder often run in families. In a new international collaboration, researchers explored the genetic connections between these and other disorders of the brain at ...

One year of school comes with an IQ bump, meta-analysis shows

June 21, 2018
A year of schooling leaves students with new knowledge, and it also equates with a small but noticeable increase to students' IQ, according to a systematic meta-analysis published in Psychological Science, a journal of the ...

Ketamine acts fast to treat depression and its effects last—but how?

June 21, 2018
In contrast to most antidepressant medications, which can take several weeks to reduce depressive symptoms, ketamine—a commonly used veterinary anesthetic—can lift a person out of a deep depression within minutes of its ...

New study debunks Dale Carnegie advice to 'put yourself in their shoes'

June 21, 2018
Putting yourself in someone else's shoes and relying on intuition or "gut instinct" isn't an accurate way to determine what they're thinking or feeling," say researchers from Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (BGU), the ...

Mindful movement may help lower stress, anxiety

June 21, 2018
Taking a walk may be a good opportunity to mentally review your to-do list, but using the time to instead be more mindful of your breathing and surroundings may help boost your wellbeing, according to researchers.

Brain tingles—first study of its kind reveals physiological benefits of ASMR

June 21, 2018
Autonomous sensory meridian response (ASMR) – the relaxing 'brain tingles' experienced by some people in response to specific triggers, such as whispering, tapping and slow hand movements – may have benefits for both ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

BubbaNicholson
1 / 5 (1) Oct 05, 2017
When you scrub psychology of untestable hypotheses, almost nothing is left. There are no psychological states, no personalities, no egos, no ids, no self-concepts. Without mass, without energy, without value? It doesn't exist.
Once you are clean of impossibilities, then you should proceed.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.