Patients and families aren't comfortable with 'overlapping surgeries,' survey finds

November 20, 2017, Wolters Kluwer Health

Patients and family members are either neutral or uncomfortable with the idea of "overlapping" or "concurrent" surgery, where the attending surgeon isn't present in the operating room for part of the procedure, according to survey results published in the November 15, 2017 issue of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.

On average, and their were "neutral with surgical procedures involving overlap of two noncritical portions and were not comfortable with overlap involving a critical portion of one or both surgical procedures.," write Jonathan P. Edgington, MD, and colleagues of the University of Chicago Medical Center. They believe their findings support the need to inform patients when overlapping or concurrent surgery is planned or possible.

First Study of Patients' Views on Overlapping Surgeries

The researchers surveyed 200 patients and members regarding their opinions about overlapping or concurrent surgery. In these procedures, the primary surgeon may be involved in different surgeries in different operating rooms at the same time. The attending surgeon may be present for "critical" parts of the procedure, leaving someone else—typically a surgery resident in training—to perform "non-critical" portions.

Overlapping and concurrent surgeries have become a controversial topic in the wake of high-profile media reports. Last year, a Senate Finance Committee report raised questions about overlapping surgeries, highlighting the lack of research on their frequency, cost-effectiveness, and impact on surgical outcomes and patient health.

In the survey, patients and families were asked to rate their familiarity and comfort with overlapping or concurrent surgery in five different scenarios. On average, familiarity with overlapping or concurrent surgery was rated about 3 on a 7-point scale. Better-educated respondents claimed to be somewhat more knowledgeable about these procedures.

Comfort ratings were lowest in a "concurrent" scenario, where critical portions of two surgeries might take place at the same time. When respondents were asked how comfortable they would be with their own surgery overlapping with another patient's, the average rating was about 2 out of 7.

When patients and families were asked why they think hospitals allow overlapping and concurrent surgeries, the most commonly cited reason was "to increase hospital revenue." More-educated respondents were more likely to mention potential benefits such as decreasing surgical costs and developing resident skills, in addition to increasing revenue.

As debate continues among hospitals, surgeons, and government, the new study is the first to seek patients' viewpoints on overlapping and concurrent surgery. Dr. Edgington and colleagues emphasize the need for further research to assess how such procedures affect patient safety and outcomes.

Meanwhile, the authors believe their findings have important implications for disclosure and informed consent. Although it's not possible to discuss every facet of a planned , they write, it is "reasonable and recommended to discuss aspects patients may be less comfortable with." Dr. Edgington and coauthors conclude, "In situations in which there is a reasonable likelihood of overlapping surgical procedures, preoperative disclosure and discussion with patients appear to be beneficial."

Explore further: Study of thousands of operations finds overlapping surgeries are safe for patients

More information: Jonathan P. Edgington et al. Preferably Not My Surgery, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (2017). DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00414

Related Stories

Study of thousands of operations finds overlapping surgeries are safe for patients

December 1, 2016
A common way of scheduling surgeries to expand patient access to care and improve hospital efficiency, known as "overlapping surgeries," is as safe and provides the same outcomes for patients as non-overlapping surgeries, ...

New study finds overlapping surgery is safe and efficient

January 12, 2017
This study was prompted due to a public safety concern after a patient became paralyzed after undergoing overlapping surgery at Massachusetts General Hospital (2012). The patient had not been informed that his surgeon would ...

Overlapping surgery appears safe in neurosurgical procedures

November 9, 2017
(HealthDay)—For patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures, overlapping surgery (OS) is not associated with morbidity, mortality, or worsened functional status, according to a study published online Nov. 8 in JAMA Surgery.

Double-booked: When surgeons operate on two patients at once

July 28, 2017
The controversial practice has been standard in many teaching hospitals for decades, its safety and ethics largely unquestioned and its existence unknown to those most affected: people undergoing surgery.

Robot-assisted surgery for kidney removal not always cost-effective

October 24, 2017
Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery to remove a patient's entire kidney requires slightly longer operating times and results in increased costs compared with the use of traditional laparoscopic surgery, according to a large, ...

Does rhinoplasty change perceptions of attractiveness, success, health?

October 19, 2017
Participants in a web-based survey who viewed pictures of patients before and after rhinoplasty rated patients after surgery as more attractive, successful and overall healthier, in an article published by JAMA Facial Plastic ...

Recommended for you

Amount of weight regain after bariatric surgery helps predict health risks

October 16, 2018
Measuring the percentage of weight regained following the maximum amount of weight lost after bariatric surgery can help predict a patient's risk of several serious health problems, according to a long-term, multicenter study ...

Technique to 'listen' to a patient's brain during tumour surgery

October 16, 2018
Surgeons could soon eavesdrop on a patient's brain activity during surgery to remove their brain tumour, helping improve the accuracy of the operation and reduce the risk of impairing brain function.

Researchers link gut bacteria to heart transplant success or failure

October 4, 2018
In a new study, researchers at the University of Maryland School of Medicine (UMSOM) have found that the gut microbiome appears to play a key role in how well the body accepts a transplanted heart. The scientists found a ...

Focus on neuroscience, nociception to improve anesthesia, paper says

October 1, 2018
People sometimes mistakenly think of general anesthesia as just a really deep sleep but in fact, anesthesia is really four brain states—unconsciousness, amnesia, immobility and suppression of the body's damage sensing response, ...

Bariatric surgery linked to safer childbirth for the mother

September 27, 2018
Obese mothers who lose weight through bariatric surgery can have safer deliveries. The positive effects are many, including fewer caesarean sections, infections, tears and haemorrhages, and fewer cases of post-term delivery ...

Antibiotics for appendicitis? Surgery often not needed

September 25, 2018
When emergency tests showed the telltale right-sided pain in Heather VanDusen's abdomen was appendicitis, she figured she'd be quickly wheeled into surgery. But doctors offered her the option of antibiotics instead.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

antoon6
not rated yet Nov 21, 2017
Medical harm by unsupervised and unqualified residents is one issue; betrayal and violation of informed consent is another. Both are criminal. My doctor agreed only he would do my surgery and signed my addition to the informed consent document also signed by me and my wife. This document was disappeared by my doctor. The entire urology department at the Cleveland Clinic was cited for having no credentialing of staff or residents and no privileging for staff or residents to use the da Vinci device in Feb 2012 and remarkably again in May 2013. The da Vinci was used on patients without their knowledge or consent. The investigation of my case by CMS cited the surgeon's attestation as blank and the same day surgery consent as blank - it was signed 7 weeks after my surgery. Audit report and OR Log show he was not present during my surgery or hospitalization. All progress notes written by 2nd yr resident not cosigned. Blood loss was 10X greater than reported. Falsely billed to govt.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.