Reading on electronic devices may interfere with science reading comprehension

Reading on electronic devices may interfere with science reading comprehension
In a study, a group of adult readers who frequently used electronic devices were significantly less successful on a reading comprehension test after reading several scientific articles compared to those who used those devices less frequently. Credit: iStock Photo / bowie15

People who often read on electronic devices may have a difficult time understanding scientific concepts, according to a team of researchers. They suggest that this finding, among others in the study, could also offer insights on how reading a scientific text differs from casual reading.

In a study, a group of adult readers who frequently used were significantly less successful on a reading comprehension test after reading several compared to those who used those devices less frequently, said Ping Li, professor of psychology and associate director of the Institute for CyberScience, Penn State.

"The more time the participants reported on using e-devices per day—for instance, reading texts on their iPhone, watching TV, playing internet games, texting, or reading an eBook—the less well they did when they tried to understand scientific texts," said Li. "There are a lot of positive uses for electronic devices and I'm an advocate of digital learning, but when it comes to understanding of concepts through reading, our take is that it's not helpful."

Li said the way people read on electronic devices may encourage them to pick up only bits and pieces of information from the material, while the comprehension of scientific information requires a more holistic approach to reading where the reader incorporates the information in a relational and structured way.

"This is sort of speculation, because, so far, this is only a correlation—When you are writing a text on a smartphone, for example, you use very short sentences and you abbreviate a lot, so it's fragmented," said Li. "When you're reading such a text, you're getting bits of information here and there and not always trying to connect the material. And I think that might be the main difference, when you're reading expository scientific texts you need to be connecting and integrating the information."

Reading science articles is different from reading narratives, as well, according to the researchers, who released their findings in the journal Reading and Writing.

"In a lot of ways, reading a science text is different from reading a story," said Li. "In a story, let's say you're reading 'Harry Potter,' you have characters, there's a plot, there's an evolving story line. And that's why we're interested in this. You can easily get engrossed in a narrative, but in reading scientific texts, you are trying to understand new or unfamiliar concepts and how they are related—and that's a very different process."

The research could help both students who need to read science articles, as well as scientists who want to make their information more accessible and readable, said Li, who worked with Jake Follmer, a former doctoral student in educational psychology; Shin-Yi Fang, postdoctoral scholar in psychology; Roy B. Clariana, professor of education; and Bonnie J. F. Meyer, professor of educational psychology, all of Penn State.

In future research, the researchers will use brain imaging tools to determine what areas of the brain are engaged while reading science texts and whether disengagement of these areas means a failure to understand, according to Li.

The researchers recruited 403 participants through Amazon Mechanical Turk to read eight different scientific articles, which were similar to articles found in a science book that covered topics such as electrical circuits, permutation, GPS, Mars and supertankers. The participants read through the articles, which were about 300 words each, or 30 sentences in length, sentence by sentence, at their own pace.

In another study, 107 participants were recruited to read the whole paragraph at once.

After reading each article, they were asked to answer 10 multiple choice questions about the article. Participants were also asked to sort key terms from the into groups.

"The sorting tasks are designed to elicit their knowledge structure developed after readers finished reading science texts," said Li. "And this method allows us to see if different people may get different mental relations of the or other concepts."

Explore further

Researchers find brain activity related to individual differences in reading comprehension

Citation: Reading on electronic devices may interfere with science reading comprehension (2017, December 6) retrieved 19 October 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Dec 06, 2017
Physic textbook, for example, explain an idea in multiple pages, while Tweet on Smartphone, for example, explain an ideas in 240 character... of course people don't prefer physic textbook, because physic textbook use inefficient language that consume a lot of memory.

People revert to science Jargon when speaking because short is preferred, if you told people to explain longer then the idea of exposition made them gave up.

I believe this is a normal. Untrained people won't read science text like science undergrad do, these kids simply slept halfway page and resume when they woke up.

The conclusion made by the writer is bad. Electronic devices has nothing to do with this.

Dec 06, 2017
With the exception of devices like the kindle readers which are specifically designed to mimic reading a book or printed page, reading on an electronic device is fundamentally different from reading a printed page. For example, instead of reading smoothly across and down the page, on a screen, reading is accomplished by multiple start/stop/restart instances as you scroll down the page.

These differences are not limited to scientific texts. Anything of any complexity which I want to study I obtain in printed form or convert to printed form to study.

There are no significant mental resources expended to read from a book. Holding the book and turning pages become automatic. There is a significant expenditure of mental effort to read from a computer screen. And breaking the process into short start/stop/restart sections interferes with comprehension.

Dec 06, 2017
I would think another problem is the Squirrel !! factor.
"Mmmm, this gravitational theory is interesting... OH! Another tweet from Neil Degrass Tyson!"

Dec 06, 2017
I read most articles from off of my tablet.

No wonder I have such a hard time understanding the articles ;-)

Dec 06, 2017
I HATE fkin TINY screens and I HATE that people LOVE them and so many use ONLY them. I HATE the way TINY screens have 'infected' (ENLARGED reformatted/dumbed-down) content on the internet etc, RUINING it for computer users. I REMEMBER when content was longer and more informative because ALL we had was computers with reasonable sized screens. PHONES ARE REGRESSIVE. They should definately be consider 'convenience and secondary devices' NOT your primary reading tool. I have ALWAYS known this.

Dec 06, 2017
Electronic screen is the same as paper, there's no disadvantages in using electronic screen. I personally could read on them just fine, in fact I've read a couple of textbook and a lot of article on LCD screens. I even read an entire engineering textbook on a 10-inch screen that I carry around after work.

If you can't read small text then you just need glasses, you won't even able to read it even on paper. You need glasses, you can't simply turn on the brightness to max, that'll ruin your brain.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more