Reading on electronic devices may interfere with science reading comprehension

December 6, 2017 by Matt Swayne, Pennsylvania State University
In a study, a group of adult readers who frequently used electronic devices were significantly less successful on a reading comprehension test after reading several scientific articles compared to those who used those devices less frequently. Credit: iStock Photo / bowie15

People who often read on electronic devices may have a difficult time understanding scientific concepts, according to a team of researchers. They suggest that this finding, among others in the study, could also offer insights on how reading a scientific text differs from casual reading.

In a study, a group of adult readers who frequently used were significantly less successful on a reading comprehension test after reading several compared to those who used those devices less frequently, said Ping Li, professor of psychology and associate director of the Institute for CyberScience, Penn State.

"The more time the participants reported on using e-devices per day—for instance, reading texts on their iPhone, watching TV, playing internet games, texting, or reading an eBook—the less well they did when they tried to understand scientific texts," said Li. "There are a lot of positive uses for electronic devices and I'm an advocate of digital learning, but when it comes to understanding of concepts through reading, our take is that it's not helpful."

Li said the way people read on electronic devices may encourage them to pick up only bits and pieces of information from the material, while the comprehension of scientific information requires a more holistic approach to reading where the reader incorporates the information in a relational and structured way.

"This is sort of speculation, because, so far, this is only a correlation—When you are writing a text on a smartphone, for example, you use very short sentences and you abbreviate a lot, so it's fragmented," said Li. "When you're reading such a text, you're getting bits of information here and there and not always trying to connect the material. And I think that might be the main difference, when you're reading expository scientific texts you need to be connecting and integrating the information."

Reading science articles is different from reading narratives, as well, according to the researchers, who released their findings in the journal Reading and Writing.

"In a lot of ways, reading a science text is different from reading a story," said Li. "In a story, let's say you're reading 'Harry Potter,' you have characters, there's a plot, there's an evolving story line. And that's why we're interested in this. You can easily get engrossed in a narrative, but in reading scientific texts, you are trying to understand new or unfamiliar concepts and how they are related—and that's a very different process."

The research could help both students who need to read science articles, as well as scientists who want to make their information more accessible and readable, said Li, who worked with Jake Follmer, a former doctoral student in educational psychology; Shin-Yi Fang, postdoctoral scholar in psychology; Roy B. Clariana, professor of education; and Bonnie J. F. Meyer, professor of educational psychology, all of Penn State.

In future research, the researchers will use brain imaging tools to determine what areas of the brain are engaged while reading science texts and whether disengagement of these areas means a failure to understand, according to Li.

The researchers recruited 403 participants through Amazon Mechanical Turk to read eight different scientific articles, which were similar to articles found in a science book that covered topics such as electrical circuits, permutation, GPS, Mars and supertankers. The participants read through the articles, which were about 300 words each, or 30 sentences in length, sentence by sentence, at their own pace.

In another study, 107 participants were recruited to read the whole paragraph at once.

After reading each article, they were asked to answer 10 multiple choice questions about the article. Participants were also asked to sort key terms from the into groups.

"The sorting tasks are designed to elicit their knowledge structure developed after readers finished reading science texts," said Li. "And this method allows us to see if different people may get different mental relations of the or other concepts."

Explore further: Researchers find brain activity related to individual differences in reading comprehension

Related Stories

Researchers find brain activity related to individual differences in reading comprehension

November 6, 2013
What makes a good reader? First, you have to know how to read the words on a page and understand them—but there's a higher-level step to reading comprehension. You have to tie together the words over time, maintaining their ...

Speed-reading apps may impair reading comprehension by limiting ability to backtrack

April 22, 2014
To address the fact that many of us are on the go and pressed for time, app developers have devised speed-reading software that eliminates the time we supposedly waste by moving our eyes as we read. But don't throw away your ...

Recommended for you

Linguistic red flags from Facebook posts can predict future depression diagnoses

October 15, 2018
In any given year, depression affects more than 6 percent of the adult population in the United States—some 16 million people—but fewer than half receive the treatment they need. What if an algorithm could scan social ...

Early changes to synapse gene regulation may cause Alzheimer's disease

October 15, 2018
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, involving memory loss and a reduction in cognitive abilities. Patients with AD develop multiple abnormal protein structures in their brains that are thought to ...

Clues that suggest people are lying may be deceptive, study shows

October 12, 2018
The verbal and physical signs of lying are harder to detect than people believe, a study suggests.

Why don't we understand statistics? Fixed mindsets may be to blame

October 12, 2018
Unfavorable methods of teaching statistics in schools and universities may be to blame for people ignoring simple solutions to statistical problems, making them hard to solve. This can have serious consequences when applied ...

From 'problem child' to 'prodigy'? LSD turns 75

October 12, 2018
Lysergic acid diethylamide was labelled a "problem child" by the man who discovered its hallucinogenic properties in 1943: as it turns 75, the drug known as LSD may now be changing its image.

How to avoid raising a materialistic child

October 12, 2018
If you're a parent, you may be concerned that materialism among children has been on the rise. According to research, materialism has been linked to a variety of mental health problems, such as anxiety and depression, as ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Dec 06, 2017
Physic textbook, for example, explain an idea in multiple pages, while Tweet on Smartphone, for example, explain an ideas in 240 character... of course people don't prefer physic textbook, because physic textbook use inefficient language that consume a lot of memory.

People revert to science Jargon when speaking because short is preferred, if you told people to explain longer then the idea of exposition made them gave up.

I believe this is a normal. Untrained people won't read science text like science undergrad do, these kids simply slept halfway page and resume when they woke up.

The conclusion made by the writer is bad. Electronic devices has nothing to do with this.
4 / 5 (1) Dec 06, 2017
With the exception of devices like the kindle readers which are specifically designed to mimic reading a book or printed page, reading on an electronic device is fundamentally different from reading a printed page. For example, instead of reading smoothly across and down the page, on a screen, reading is accomplished by multiple start/stop/restart instances as you scroll down the page.

These differences are not limited to scientific texts. Anything of any complexity which I want to study I obtain in printed form or convert to printed form to study.

There are no significant mental resources expended to read from a book. Holding the book and turning pages become automatic. There is a significant expenditure of mental effort to read from a computer screen. And breaking the process into short start/stop/restart sections interferes with comprehension.

not rated yet Dec 06, 2017
I would think another problem is the Squirrel !! factor.
"Mmmm, this gravitational theory is interesting... OH! Another tweet from Neil Degrass Tyson!"
not rated yet Dec 06, 2017
I read most articles from off of my tablet.

No wonder I have such a hard time understanding the articles ;-)
not rated yet Dec 06, 2017
I HATE fkin TINY screens and I HATE that people LOVE them and so many use ONLY them. I HATE the way TINY screens have 'infected' (ENLARGED reformatted/dumbed-down) content on the internet etc, RUINING it for computer users. I REMEMBER when content was longer and more informative because ALL we had was computers with reasonable sized screens. PHONES ARE REGRESSIVE. They should definately be consider 'convenience and secondary devices' NOT your primary reading tool. I have ALWAYS known this.
not rated yet Dec 06, 2017
Electronic screen is the same as paper, there's no disadvantages in using electronic screen. I personally could read on them just fine, in fact I've read a couple of textbook and a lot of article on LCD screens. I even read an entire engineering textbook on a 10-inch screen that I carry around after work.

If you can't read small text then you just need glasses, you won't even able to read it even on paper. You need glasses, you can't simply turn on the brightness to max, that'll ruin your brain.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.