Hemoglobin A1c levels not tied to wound outcomes

Hemoglobin A1c levels not tied to wound outcomes

(HealthDay)—There does not appear to be a clinically meaningful association between baseline or prospective hemoglobin A1c (A1C) and wound healing in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), according to a study published online April 16 in Diabetes Care.

Betiel K. Fesseha, M.D., from Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, and colleagues retrospectively evaluated the association between A1C and wound outcomes in 270 with 584 DFUs over a study period of 4.7 years.

The researchers found that baseline A1C was not associated with in univariate or in fully adjusted models. In the participants with baseline A1C <7.5 percent (hazard ratio [HR], 2.07; 95 percent CI, 1.08 to 4.00), no association with wound healing was seen with the mean A1C change from baseline. A nadir A1C change of 0.09 to 2.4 (tertile 3) was positively associated with long-term wound healing versus those with a nadir A1C change from baseline of −0.29 to 0.0 (tertile 2) in this group. For participants with baseline A1C ≥7.5 percent, neither nadir A1C change nor mean A1C change were associated with long-term wound healing.

"The paradoxical finding of accelerated wound healing and increase in A1C in participants with better baseline glycemic control requires confirmation in further studies," the authors write.

More information: Abstract/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Journal information: Diabetes Care

Copyright © 2018 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Hemoglobin A1c levels not tied to wound outcomes (2018, April 27) retrieved 18 May 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-04-hemoglobin-a1c-tied-wound-outcomes.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy no benefit for diabetic foot ulcers


Feedback to editors