Study: Women perceive men who extrovertly display their wealth as unsuitable partners for long-term relationships

cabrio
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

When a man throws money around on flashy cars, people intuitively interpret this behavior as a sign that he is more interested in short-term sexual relationships than in romantic commitment. This is according to Daniel Kruger of the University of Michigan and Jessica Kruger at the University at Buffalo in the US, in a study published in Springer's journal Evolutionary Psychological Science.

Compared to women, men have a greater tendency to conspicuously display their wealth. This is consistent with their typical role as providers and is thought to be a way for them to advertise their intentions about a . Across cultures, a woman's preference for a certain at a specific time reflects the type of partnership she is considering. Physical qualities are more important when she has a brief fling in mind, while a man's wealth is more influential when she is deciding on a suitable life partner who can provide for her children.

This study investigated how a man's display of wealth is interpreted by others. Two groups of undergraduate students completed anonymous online surveys. They first read through the descriptions of two men who were purchasing cars. The participants then rated each character on dating and parenting behaviors, his interest in relationships and his attractiveness to others. Both men spent the same budget. One man made a frugal investment by buying a new car for the sake of reliability. The other opted for a used car and proceeded to spend the remaining money on flashy purchases such as new paint, larger wheels and an impressive sound system for the vehicle.

Male and female participants both rated the man with the flashy car as being more interested in brief sexual relationships. He scored higher marks for the effort he made towards securing a mate but received low marks for how much he was willing to invest as a potential life partner. The flashy man was more attractive to women for brief sexual encounters, but did not tick the boxes for a long-term committed romantic partner for a relationship in which to raise families. In this case, the man who made the frugal car purchase scored much higher. Overall, he received top marks as a potential life partner, parent and provider.

"Participants demonstrated an intuitive understanding that men investing in the display of goods featuring exaggerated sensory properties have reproductive strategies with higher mating effort and greater interest in short-term sexual relationships, as well as lower paternal investment and interest in long-term committed romantic relationships than men investing in practical considerations," explains Daniel Kruger.

"This contrasts with the notion that men's conspicuous resource displays are attractive to women because they reliably signal expected future resource investment in partners and especially in offspring," adds Jessica Kruger, who says the study increases researchers' understanding of how human psychology and behavior applies to technologically advanced and wealthy societies.


Explore further

Money really does matter in relationships: study

More information: Daniel J. Kruger et al. What Do Economically Costly Signals Signal?: a Life History Framework for Interpreting Conspicuous Consumption, Evolutionary Psychological Science (2018). DOI: 10.1007/s40806-018-0151-y
Citation: Study: Women perceive men who extrovertly display their wealth as unsuitable partners for long-term relationships (2018, May 7) retrieved 17 February 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-05-women-men-extrovertly-wealth-unsuitable.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
1640 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 08, 2018
Written by a pleb PhDs and their commie students. One thing you don't understand, is that not everything is done to attract whatever other sex is person's preference. Actually, a small fraction of the things are.

Often people buy good quality things because they like them. And because when some people can afford good things, a part of equation becomes: what is there to be frugal about, if having a nice car makes not even infinitesimal difference financially, but adds to life enjoyment?

But, of course, how could a poor pHd know anything about that, living from paycheck to paycheck? Keep publishing you nonsense, comrade.

May 08, 2018
Surveys and "Experiments under controlled settings" are not viable indicators of human female behavior. (especially when these experiments are conducted by Marxist leftists)

The PROOF? Donald Trump VERY FLASHY 3 WIVES, and I could list at least 100 men who DISPLAY THEIR WEALTH and are married (many of them happily married)

Very sad that Sociology and Psychology has been TAKEN OVER by Radical Leftists.

THIS SITE SHOULD GET RID OF THE PSYCHOLOGY/SOCIOLOGY Studies/articles. Because they are insult to our intelligence.

May 14, 2018
They're probably only interested in women that flashy appeals to.

Here's the flip side:
There are women you'd sleep with and women you'd take home to mom.
They're not always the same and you shouldn't treat them like they are.

I think that would make a great abstract.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more