Poll: If DNA shows health risks, most want to know

July 19, 2018 by Lauran Neergaard And Emily Swanson

Would you want to know if you harbor a gene linked to Alzheimer's or another incurable disease? A new poll finds most Americans would.

Some 17 percent of Americans already have undergone at least one kind of DNA test, and 52 percent of the remainder say they'd like to, according to the poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research released Thursday.

Curiosity about ancestry is the main reason. But large segments of the public also want to know if they're at risk for various medical conditions—even if they can't do anything about it. In fact, 60 percent of people say they'd want to know if they carried a gene associated with a disease that's currently incurable, the AP-NORC poll found.

The question is how they'd handle that information. For most diseases, whether you get sick depends on a mix of genetics, lifestyle and other factors.

"It's really important for people to understand that it is a risk, not a destiny," said Erica Ramos, president of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

LOTS OF TESTS TO CHOOSE FROM

Genealogy buffs can get clues about ancestry. DNA testing can help diagnose symptoms, predict risk of later health problems, or tell if prospective parents might pass on diseases such as cystic fibrosis. Doctors can tell if certain medicines are more or less likely to work based on genetics, what's called precision medicine.

Some gene tests require just a credit card and mailing in a saliva sample, while others need a doctor's order—and there are important differences.

WHAT PEOPLE WANT TO KNOW

Younger adults especially want to know what health conditions might lie ahead. Among those under 30, more than two-thirds are interested in and of those, 65 percent say one reason is to learn if they might pass a disease to their children.

If they're at risk for an , 78 percent of the younger crowd would want to know.

And if they got that bad news, 8 in 10 people of all ages would tell siblings and children, family members who might harbor the same gene.

WHO GETS TESTED

Those living in households making $100,000 a year or more are most likely to have had a gene test. Direct-to-consumer tests are paid for out-of-pocket, but insurance may cover DNA tests deemed medically necessary.

TRUSTING THE RESULTS

Most people think genetic testing is at least somewhat reliable, but less than half call it very or extremely reliable, the poll found.

DNA testing isn't foolproof, said Ramos, the genetic counselor. There can be false alarms, the reason medical labs and the most popular direct-to-consumer companies must meet strict testing rules. But there are loopholes: Say after ancestry testing, you download the "raw" genetic data generated to analyze your heritage and send the file to a second company to interpret whatever health information is inside. Those companies may not be certified for medical diagnosis—meaning it's important for a doctor to verify any scary result.

The flip side: False reassurance. Direct-to-consumer tests for breast cancer risk, for example, only look for a few mutations. If cancer runs in the family, you may need a doctor-ordered that examines a variety of genes and mutations, Ramos said.

A genetic counselor can help explain the different tests and what results mean.

PRIVACY IS COMPLICATED, TOO

Half of Americans are very or extremely concerned about companies sharing their genetic data without their knowledge, and roughly a third have the same concerns about medical researchers and doctors, the poll found.

Remember how investigators used a free genealogy website to track down a suspected California serial killer ? Half of people think should be used to help solve crimes only with the consent of the person tested, a third think it's OK without that consent—and 13 percent don't think law enforcement should use it at all.

Crime aside, federal law offers some privacy protections for DNA testing in medical settings—but check privacy policies on direct-to-consumer websites.

___

The AP-NORC poll of 1,109 adults was conducted June 13-18 using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for all respondents is plus or minus 4.1 percentage points.

Respondents were first selected randomly using address-based sampling methods, and later interviewed online or by phone.

Explore further: Recreational ancestry DNA testing may reveal more than consumers bargained for

More information: AP-NORC Center: www.apnorc.org/

Related Stories

Recreational ancestry DNA testing may reveal more than consumers bargained for

May 14, 2018
Aggressive marketing techniques and the popularization of "gifting" recreational ancestry tests has led more consumers than ever to the world of personal genetic testing. Yet, the recent arrest of the Golden State Killer ...

Those at-home DNA tests are an imperfect science

July 3, 2018
(HealthDay)—If you're considering at-home DNA testing, there are some things you need to know, California State University experts say.

Home genetic tests should be interpreted by experts

March 22, 2018
Results from at-home genetic tests are not always accurate. A new study in the journal Genetics in Medicine, published by Springer Nature, now shows that up to 40 percent of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic tests provide ...

Breast cancer researcher warns against online genetic tests

June 18, 2018
We have never been so fascinated by the secrets inside our cells.

Ditching the doctor? What to know about home health tests before trying them

July 3, 2018
Medical tests save lives. Discovering diseases before they become more serious can mean the difference between life and death. But many Americans say they don't have time to see a doctor, live too far from a medical facility ...

Five things to consider before ordering an online DNA test

April 5, 2018
You might be intrigued by what your genes could tell you about your ancestry or the health risks hidden in your DNA. If so, you're not alone.

Recommended for you

Critical role of DHA on foetal brain development revealed

August 17, 2018
Duke-NUS researchers have found evidence that a natural form of Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) made by the liver called Lyso-Phosphatidyl-Choline (LPC-DHA), is critical for normal foetal and infant brain development, and that ...

Gene silencing critical for normal breast development

August 17, 2018
Researchers have discovered that normal breast development relies on a genetic 'brake', a protein complex that keeps swathes of genes silenced.

New algorithm could improve diagnosis of rare diseases

August 17, 2018
Today, diagnosing rare genetic diseases requires a slow process of educated guesswork. Gill Bejerano, Ph.D., associate professor of developmental biology and of computer science at Stanford, is working to speed it up.

Officials remove special rules for gene therapy experiments

August 16, 2018
U.S. health officials are eliminating special regulations for gene therapy experiments, saying that what was once exotic science is quickly becoming an established form of medical care with no extraordinary risks.

Genetic link discovered between circadian rhythms and mood disorders

August 15, 2018
Circadian rhythms are regular 24-hour variations in behaviour and activity that control many aspects of our lives, from hormone levels to sleeping and eating habits.

Ovarian cancer genetics unravelled

August 14, 2018
Patterns of genetic mutation in ovarian cancer are helping make sense of the disease, and could be used to personalise treatment in future.

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.